Re: [FFmpeg-devel] avfilter/vf_interlace and vf_tinterlace : remove avx version
> when running checkasm several times sse2 is mostly faster here, not always. > But the difference is quite small. > Since I´m not an SIMD expert I´m fine with this patch as long as no one > with more expertise objects. > > > Seems like Paul B Mahol is against. And I don't have strong opinion on this, and i'm not an SIMD expert, So i will drop this patch. Martin ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
Re: [FFmpeg-devel] avfilter/vf_interlace and vf_tinterlace : remove avx version
Hi, 2017-12-16 18:38 GMT+01:00 Martin Vignali: > Hello, > > Following discussion "avfilter/vf_interlace : add checkasm for lowpass_line > and AVX2 version" > the AVX version seems to be slower than SSE > > Patch in attach remove it, for vf_interlace and vf_tinterlace (both use the > same SIMD) > when running checkasm several times sse2 is mostly faster here, not always. But the difference is quite small. Since I´m not an SIMD expert I´m fine with this patch as long as no one with more expertise objects. Regards, Thomas ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
[FFmpeg-devel] avfilter/vf_interlace and vf_tinterlace : remove avx version
Hello, Following discussion "avfilter/vf_interlace : add checkasm for lowpass_line and AVX2 version" the AVX version seems to be slower than SSE Patch in attach remove it, for vf_interlace and vf_tinterlace (both use the same SIMD) Martin 0004-avfilter-vf_interlace-and-vf_tinterlace.patch Description: Binary data ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel