Pushed, thanks for testing.
Martin
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:11:47AM +0100, Martin Vignali wrote:
> >> Can you check that and fix it?
> >>
> >>
> >
> Patch in attach fix for me vsynth3 interlace prores test :
> make fate-vsynth3-prores_int;make fate-vsynth3-prores_444_int
>
> Pass fate test for me (os x X86_64) with and without
>
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:11:47AM +0100, Martin Vignali wrote:
> >> Can you check that and fix it?
> >>
> >>
> >
> Patch in attach fix for me vsynth3 interlace prores test :
> make fate-vsynth3-prores_int;make fate-vsynth3-prores_444_int
>
> Pass fate test for me (os x X86_64) with and without
>
>> Can you check that and fix it?
>>
>>
>
Patch in attach fix for me vsynth3 interlace prores test :
make fate-vsynth3-prores_int;make fate-vsynth3-prores_444_int
Pass fate test for me (os x X86_64) with and without
--enable-memory-poisoning
Martin
>
> These tests fail on all FATE boxes. http://fate.ffmpeg.org/
>
> Can you check that and fix it?
>
>
Seems to be related to memory poisoning (pass when disable) :
http://fate.ffmpeg.org/report.cgi?time=20190307033138=x86_64-archlinux-gcc-valgrind-no-undef
Will take a look.
Martin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 6:05 PM Martin Vignali wrote:
>
> > works here
> >
> >
> Pushed, thanks.
>
These tests fail on all FATE boxes. http://fate.ffmpeg.org/
Can you check that and fix it?
- Hendrik
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> works here
>
>
Pushed, thanks.
Martin
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:04:58PM +0100, Martin Vignali wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the files
>
> The problem appear for "unsafe" resolution (only vsynth3 have this).
>
> Patchs in attach are supposed to fix this
> 001 : fix sub_image_with_fill for interlaced encoding
> 002 : new fate test,
Hello,
Thanks for the files
The problem appear for "unsafe" resolution (only vsynth3 have this).
Patchs in attach are supposed to fix this
001 : fix sub_image_with_fill for interlaced encoding
002 : new fate test, with update result for vsynth3 interlace test
Can be test with :
make
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 09:01:16PM +0100, Martin Vignali wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for testing.
> Can you send me the result file vsynth3-prores_int.mov, so i can try to
> find why the result are not the same.
https://ffmpeg.org/~michael/vsynth3-prores_int.mov
Hello,
Thanks for testing.
Can you send me the result file vsynth3-prores_int.mov, so i can try to
find why the result are not the same.
Only the two vsynth3 interlaced test fail ?
Martin
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 07:10:06PM +0100, Martin Vignali wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Patch in attach add fate test for interlace and 444 encoding
>
> All prores_aw encoding test can be test with :
>
> make fate-vsynth3-prores;make fate-vsynth2-prores;make
> fate-vsynth1-prores;make
Hello,
Patch in attach add fate test for interlace and 444 encoding
All prores_aw encoding test can be test with :
make fate-vsynth3-prores;make fate-vsynth2-prores;make
fate-vsynth1-prores;make fate-vsynth_lena-prores SAMPLES=fate-suite/;make
fate-vsynth3-prores_int;make
13 matches
Mail list logo
