Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread James Darnley
On 2015-10-21 12:18, wm4 wrote: > with size_t/ptrdiff_t > being 128 bit, and a new "long long long int" type (I swear, they will > do it, even if that type name looks horrible). Please no! Just require a C99 style uint128_t/int128_t type. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread James Darnley
On 2015-10-21 14:44, Clément Bœsch wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 06:00:21AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > [...] >> why don't you spend 5 minutes trying to outline to beginners like me >> what is "actually important" in your view? >> > > According to the first 100 answers of the survey,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Timothy Gu wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:09 PM Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> It is known that there exist at least certain parts of the codebase >> that do not work correctly if ints are 64 bits. One of

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Ganesh Ajjanagadde mit.edu> writes: > Since you seem to be an "expert" on what things > affect this decade, why don't you spend 5 minutes > trying to outline to beginners like me what is > "actually important" in your view? Important is whatever you want to work on. That can be DTS-XLL or

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:18 AM, wm4 wrote: > On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:00:21 -0400 > Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > >> I don't "expect support" from anyone. Frankly, I have dealt with >> enough mud from you, who seems to take great pleasure in criticizing >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Timothy Gu wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:09 PM Ganesh Ajjanagadde

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread wm4
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:00:21 -0400 Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > I don't "expect support" from anyone. Frankly, I have dealt with > enough mud from you, who seems to take great pleasure in criticizing > or otherwise derailing every patch/discussion of mine to not care > about

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread Hendrik Leppkes
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Timothy Gu wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:09 PM Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> It is known that there exist at least

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Ganesh Ajjanagadde mit.edu> writes: > >> Since you seem to be an "expert" on what things >> affect this decade, why don't you spend 5 minutes >> trying to outline to beginners like me what is >> "actually important" in

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 06:00:21AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: [...] > why don't you spend 5 minutes trying to outline to beginners like me > what is "actually important" in your view? > According to the first 100 answers of the survey, the majority of the users want... speed optimisation

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-21 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Mark Harris wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> It is known that there exist at least certain parts of the codebase >> that do not work correctly if ints are 64 bits. One of

[FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-20 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
Hi all, It is known that there exist at least certain parts of the codebase that do not work correctly if ints are 64 bits. One of them I noticed was in avutil/intmath.h: ff_ctz_c does not compute the right thing if int is 64 bits. This is true both before and after the De-Bruijn optimization. A

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-20 Thread Mark Harris
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > Hi all, > > It is known that there exist at least certain parts of the codebase > that do not work correctly if ints are 64 bits. One of them I noticed > was in avutil/intmath.h: ff_ctz_c does not compute the right

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] forcing ints to be 64 bits, possible new FATE client idea

2015-10-20 Thread Timothy Gu
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:09 PM Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > Hi all, > > It is known that there exist at least certain parts of the codebase > that do not work correctly if ints are 64 bits. One of them I noticed > was in avutil/intmath.h: ff_ctz_c does not compute the right