On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 02:20:46PM +, Gaullier Nicolas wrote:
> >this breaks fate
> >
> >If the changes are intended the reference must be updated by the patch
> >causing the changes
>
> Sorry, forgot... Now, I have some questions regarding fate tests:
>
> 1) I would like to update the fate
>this breaks fate
>
>If the changes are intended the reference must be updated by the patch causing
>the changes
Sorry, forgot... Now, I have some questions regarding fate tests:
1) I would like to update the fate test itself :
Currently, we have : silencedetect=d=-20dB
I am considering
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 11:01:20AM +, Gaullier Nicolas wrote:
> (attachement + email object fixed : sorry about that x2)
> Attached patch fixes accuracy of silence_start.
> The benefit is mostly noticeable when the silence starts at the very
> beginning (ie. silence_start=0 exactly).
>
(attachement + email object fixed : sorry about that x2)
Attached patch fixes accuracy of silence_start.
The benefit is mostly noticeable when the silence starts at the very beginning
(ie. silence_start=0 exactly).
Nicolas Gaullier
0002-avfilter-af_silencedetect-fix-silence_start-accuracy.patch
(email object fixed : sorry about that)
Attached patch fixes accuracy of silence_start.
The benefit is mostly noticeable when the silence starts at the very beginning
(ie. silence_start=0 exactly).
Nicolas Gaullier
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
