Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] avcodec/bitpacked: add interlace support

2018-04-12 Thread Patrick Keroulas
oirfairelinux.com> > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 2:47:40 AM > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] avcodec/bitpacked: add interlace > support > On 4/10/18, Patrick Keroulas <patrick.kerou...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote: > > From: Damien Riegel <damien.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] avcodec/bitpacked: add interlace support

2018-04-11 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 10 April 2018 at 22:21, Patrick Keroulas < patrick.kerou...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote: > From: Damien Riegel > > This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel > formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] avcodec/bitpacked: add interlace support

2018-04-11 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 10 April 2018 at 22:21, Patrick Keroulas < patrick.kerou...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote: > From: Damien Riegel > > This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel > formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] avcodec/bitpacked: add interlace support

2018-04-11 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/10/18, Patrick Keroulas wrote: > From: Damien Riegel > > This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel > formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between > progressive

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v1 2/3] avcodec/bitpacked: add interlace support

2018-04-10 Thread Patrick Keroulas
From: Damien Riegel This codec is already capable of depacking some combinations of pixel formats and depth as defined in the RFC4175. The only difference between progressive and interlace is that either a packet will contain the whole frame, or only a field