Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Michael Fritscher
Hello Rostislav, what are, in your oppinion, the biggest problems in ffserver? (I would like to hear other oppinions a well ;-) ) Missing FATE and usage of internal / deprecated API are known to me, but it seems that you have more generic problems with ffserver? Personally I must admit that I'm

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Thomas Volkert
On 17.09.2016 22:27, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: > >> Good day, >> >> I read the sad news about ffservers a few days ago and have already >> written some mails to ffmpeg-user. >> >> I would like to step in to make ffserver maintainable and distributable >> again, especially because of the many

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Josh de Kock
On 17/09/2016 22:22, Michael Fritscher wrote: Hello, The other programs will probably be exported elsewhere sometime in the future, for now since ffserver is getting removed having it put someplace else is a good starting point. My idea was to have the 2 repositories "ffmpeg-main" with the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Michael Fritscher
Hello, > The other programs will probably be exported elsewhere sometime in the > future, for now since ffserver is getting removed having it put someplace > else is a good starting point. My idea was to have the 2 repositories "ffmpeg-main" with the libraries and "ffmpeg-tools" with all of the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Lukasz Marek
On 17.09.2016 23:10, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: On 17 September 2016 at 22:04, Lukasz Marek wrote: Yeah, no. You can hardly say ffserver is a perfect program right now, so really moving it to another repo is hardly much of a change in terms of functionality.

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 17 September 2016 at 21:34, Michael Fritscher < michael.fritsc...@telematik-zentrum.de> wrote: > Hello Rostislav, > > I really think ffserver is better off being in a separate repository. > That > > way there'd be some finer attention brought to keeping the API usable by > > external users

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Lukasz Marek
On 17.09.2016 22:27, Rostislav Pehlivanov wrote: On 17 September 2016 at 20:58, Michael Fritscher < michael.fritsc...@telematik-zentrum.de> wrote: Good day, I read the sad news about ffservers a few days ago and have already written some mails to ffmpeg-user. I would like to step in to make

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Michael Fritscher
Hello Rostislav, > I really think ffserver is better off being in a separate repository. That > way there'd be some finer attention brought to keeping the API usable by > external users too. Same with the rest of the programs. So, if I unterstand you correctly, your vision is to move all ff*

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Rostislav Pehlivanov
On 17 September 2016 at 20:58, Michael Fritscher < michael.fritsc...@telematik-zentrum.de> wrote: > Good day, > > I read the sad news about ffservers a few days ago and have already > written some mails to ffmpeg-user. > > I would like to step in to make ffserver maintainable and distributable >

[FFmpeg-devel] Resurrection of ffserver

2016-09-17 Thread Michael Fritscher
Good day, I read the sad news about ffservers a few days ago and have already written some mails to ffmpeg-user. I would like to step in to make ffserver maintainable and distributable again, especially because of the many users depending on ffserver - including myself. I'm capable of C and