Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V2 01/11] lavu/opt: add AV_OPT_FLAG_BSF_PARAM

2018-03-13 Thread Jun Zhao
On 2018/3/14 6:02, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 09:23:02AM +0800, Jun Zhao wrote: >> V2: update opt fate test ref file >> opt.c |1 + >> opt.h |1 + >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) >> 5e930c1851c198bd35369b87965c6eeadfd39a95 >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V2 01/11] lavu/opt: add AV_OPT_FLAG_BSF_PARAM

2018-03-13 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 09:23:02AM +0800, Jun Zhao wrote: > V2: update opt fate test ref file > opt.c |1 + > opt.h |1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > 5e930c1851c198bd35369b87965c6eeadfd39a95 > 0001-lavu-opt-add-AV_OPT_FLAG_BSF_PARAM.patch > From

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V2 01/11] lavu/opt: add AV_OPT_FLAG_BSF_PARAM

2018-03-12 Thread Jun Zhao
On 2018/3/12 22:23, James Almer wrote: > On 3/11/2018 10:23 PM, Jun Zhao wrote: >> V2: update opt fate test ref file > Unrelated to this patch, but can you please make sure to the patchsets > you send are contained in a single thread? Every email in a set after > the first should be a reply to

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V2 01/11] lavu/opt: add AV_OPT_FLAG_BSF_PARAM

2018-03-12 Thread James Almer
On 3/11/2018 10:23 PM, Jun Zhao wrote: > V2: update opt fate test ref file Unrelated to this patch, but can you please make sure to the patchsets you send are contained in a single thread? Every email in a set after the first should be a reply to it.