Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Common mailing-list for API evolutions

2014-08-24 Thread wm4
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:28:56 +0200
Clément Bœsch u...@pkh.me wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Kieran suggested tonight on #ffmpeg-devel to have a common mailing-list
 between the two projects to start communicating again in sane terms.
 
 The proposition would be a mailing-list where the 2 projects would send
 the patches that will make API evolutions. So the projects can continue to
 drop or add codecs  filters without caring about the other, but will try
 to communicate more about the API, for the sake of our common users.
 
 At first, I suggest that won't engage anything from any of the two
 projects (so we don't end up in a stalled states such as one project
 trying to block the other), but it could be seen as a way to introduce
 some common technical ground.
 
 What do you think?

That sounds like a good idea!

 On the technical side, we potentially need a neutral party to setup such
 mailing-list. Is anyone willing to do that?

Maybe videolan could provide that? Unless a mailing list on either the
ffmpeg or libav servers would be sufficient.

 Best regards,
 

___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Common mailing-list for API evolutions

2014-08-24 Thread Lou Logan
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014, at 02:28 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
 On the technical side, we potentially need a neutral party to setup such
 mailing-list. Is anyone willing to do that?

The neutral party should also be willing to regularly parse the pending
moderator requests for valid messages from unsubscribed users, messages
over the size limit, etc (assuming Mailman is going to be used; I'm
unfamiliar with anything else). I just don't want it to be a
make-it-and-forget-it type of thing.

I could volunteer to do that monotonous job, but then it could be argued
that it is no longer neutral.

Lou
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Common mailing-list for API evolutions

2014-08-24 Thread compn
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 08:57:04 -0800
Lou Logan l...@lrcd.com wrote:

 On Sat, Aug 23, 2014, at 02:28 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
  On the technical side, we potentially need a neutral party to setup
  such mailing-list. Is anyone willing to do that?
 
 The neutral party should also be willing to regularly parse the
 pending moderator requests for valid messages from unsubscribed
 users, messages over the size limit, etc (assuming Mailman is going
 to be used; I'm unfamiliar with anything else). I just don't want it
 to be a make-it-and-forget-it type of thing.
 
 I could volunteer to do that monotonous job, but then it could be
 argued that it is no longer neutral.

lou is very good at moderating the queues of the mailing lists.

i also throw in my hat if such moderation is needed, although i dont
check it as often as lou does.

re content/bias/neutrality, i only check for patch or spam. i accept
all development/flames and reject any spam.

-compn
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Common mailing-list for API evolutions

2014-08-24 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:54:19PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
 On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:28:56 +0200
 Clément Bœsch u...@pkh.me wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  Kieran suggested tonight on #ffmpeg-devel to have a common mailing-list
  between the two projects to start communicating again in sane terms.
  
  The proposition would be a mailing-list where the 2 projects would send
  the patches that will make API evolutions. So the projects can continue to
  drop or add codecs  filters without caring about the other, but will try
  to communicate more about the API, for the sake of our common users.
  
  At first, I suggest that won't engage anything from any of the two
  projects (so we don't end up in a stalled states such as one project
  trying to block the other), but it could be seen as a way to introduce
  some common technical ground.
  
  What do you think?
 
 That sounds like a good idea!

+1

though it makes only sense if libav is also using it, spliting
ffmpeg development mails up across 2 lists isnt a great idea ...

maybe mails could be CC-ed or automatically forwarded to ffmpeg-devel ?


 
  On the technical side, we potentially need a neutral party to setup such
  mailing-list. Is anyone willing to do that?
 
 Maybe videolan could provide that? Unless a mailing list on either the
 ffmpeg or libav servers would be sufficient.

i can setup a mailing list on ffmpeg.org if people want
also, technically it would be easiest to just use ffmpeg-devel itself
all ffmpeg developers are already subscribed and quite a few libav
people as well ...

Thanks

[...]
-- 
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony.
-- Heraclitus


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Common mailing-list for API evolutions

2014-08-24 Thread wm4
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 19:35:28 +0200
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at wrote:

 On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:54:19PM +0200, wm4 wrote:
  On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:28:56 +0200
  Clément Bœsch u...@pkh.me wrote:
  
   Hi,
   
   Kieran suggested tonight on #ffmpeg-devel to have a common mailing-list
   between the two projects to start communicating again in sane terms.
   
   The proposition would be a mailing-list where the 2 projects would send
   the patches that will make API evolutions. So the projects can continue to
   drop or add codecs  filters without caring about the other, but will try
   to communicate more about the API, for the sake of our common users.
   
   At first, I suggest that won't engage anything from any of the two
   projects (so we don't end up in a stalled states such as one project
   trying to block the other), but it could be seen as a way to introduce
   some common technical ground.
   
   What do you think?
  
  That sounds like a good idea!
 
 +1
 
 though it makes only sense if libav is also using it, spliting
 ffmpeg development mails up across 2 lists isnt a great idea ...
 
 maybe mails could be CC-ed or automatically forwarded to ffmpeg-devel ?
 
 
  
   On the technical side, we potentially need a neutral party to setup such
   mailing-list. Is anyone willing to do that?
  
  Maybe videolan could provide that? Unless a mailing list on either the
  ffmpeg or libav servers would be sufficient.
 
 i can setup a mailing list on ffmpeg.org if people want
 also, technically it would be easiest to just use ffmpeg-devel itself
 all ffmpeg developers are already subscribed and quite a few libav
 people as well ...

This wouldn't be neutral ground. Posters from FFmpeg should also be
aware that the list is neutral ground, and not their turf. It's the
difference between being guests or the guys in charge.

 Thanks
 
 [...]

___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Common mailing-list for API evolutions

2014-08-23 Thread Clément Bœsch
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:27:09AM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Kieran suggested tonight on #ffmpeg-devel to have a common mailing-list
 between the two projects to start communicating again in sane terms.
 
 The proposition would be a mailing-list where the 2 projects would send
 the patches that will make API evolutions. So the projects can continue to
 drop or add codecs  filters without caring about the other, but will try
 to communicate more about the API, for the sake of our common users.
 
 At first, I suggest that won't engage anything from any of the two
 projects (so we don't end up in a stalled states such as one project
 trying to block the other), but it could be seen as a way to introduce
 some common technical ground.
 
 What do you think?
 
 On the technical side, we potentially need a neutral party to setup such
 mailing-list. Is anyone willing to do that?
 
 Best regards,
 

Please don't reply here, I messed up the libav-devel mail...

-- 
Clément B.


pgpvGZVKwQQiR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel