On 11 March 2015 at 14:42, Marcus Johnson bumblebritche...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working on adding XLL for the last couple months, it's still not
quite complete, basically I have to combine the Core and XLL samples before
it's output, and I also have to finish the latter stages of decoding
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:47:55AM +, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 3/12/2015 11:25 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
you continue to talk about something completely unrelated to what i
said/meant.
you: take best code
[...]
I: for code to be ever in FFmpeg it must either be
On 3/12/2015 12:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Its interresting what kind of bizare replies one gets by stating on
the main FFmpeg development list that work should be based on FFmpeg
and should be tested. And then repeating a few times that this is
really what was meant and none of the
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:10:17AM -0400, compn wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:47:55 +
Derek Buitenhuis derek.buitenh...@gmail.com wrote:
answer to that is a *single* decoder, which works the best -
just say it with less words. you dont want dual decoders like prores.
i strongly want to
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:47:55 +
Derek Buitenhuis derek.buitenh...@gmail.com wrote:
answer to that is a *single* decoder, which works the best -
just say it with less words. you dont want dual decoders like prores.
(i'm not going to make the argument that multiple users use different
prores
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:44:22PM +, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 3/11/2015 9:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Thats analogous to saying no its not important to put fuel in a
car, its important to drive the best car
No what I propose is to look at both and decide which is best. Simply
On 3/12/2015 11:25 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
you continue to talk about something completely unrelated to what i
said/meant.
you: take best code
[...]
I: for code to be ever in FFmpeg it must either be developed on top
of FFmpeg or it must be rebased/ merged/integrated at some point.
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:47:55 +
Derek Buitenhuis derek.buitenh...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking at what is the best end result for the *user*. The answer to that
is a *single* decoder, which works the best - regardless of the effort it.
Yes,
I don't buy that merging one from Libav causes
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Marcus Johnson
bumblebritche...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought the patch on LibAV was completely removed?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.libav.devel/66825/focus=66826
It'll probably be merged soon'ish. It still has some open TODOs, but
at this point its
I thought the patch on LibAV was completely removed? it was purged from the
codebase like 9 months ago or something, I stumbled on that while trying to
fix some of the issues with the white paper I was having.
I haven't bothered with the Core decoder, but everything I've extracted so
far is fixed
On 3/11/2015 8:25 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
whats important is a patchset based on and tested on FFmpeg, at least
if people want a working decoder in FFmpeg
No, what's important is that the best possible code is used. Origin is
irrelevant.
- Derek
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 09:04:39PM +, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
On 3/11/2015 8:25 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
whats important is a patchset based on and tested on FFmpeg, at least
if people want a working decoder in FFmpeg
No, what's important is that the best possible code is used.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 04:07:00PM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Marcus Johnson
bumblebritche...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought the patch on LibAV was completely removed?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.libav.devel/66825/focus=66826
It'll probably be
On 3/11/2015 9:36 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
Thats analogous to saying no its not important to put fuel in a
car, its important to drive the best car
No what I propose is to look at both and decide which is best. Simply being
submitted to FFmpeg first does not make it better.
the 2nd is
On 3/11/2015 2:42 PM, Marcus Johnson wrote:
I've been working on adding XLL for the last couple months, it's still not
quite complete, basically I have to combine the Core and XLL samples before
it's output, and I also have to finish the latter stages of decoding the
XLL like channel
On 3/11/2015 2:42 PM, Marcus Johnson wrote:
I've been working on adding XLL for the last couple months, it's still not
quite complete, basically I have to combine the Core and XLL samples before
it's output, and I also have to finish the latter stages of decoding the
XLL like channel
16 matches
Mail list logo
