Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-20 Thread Yayoi Ukai
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Nicolas George wrote: > Le nonidi 29 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Yayoi Ukai a écrit : >> > Thanks. You are right, this was imprecise. I meant linear combination with >> > total coefficients one; barycenter in other words. For example: 10 commits >> >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-20 Thread Yayoi Ukai
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:58 AM, wm4 wrote: > On 16.09.2015 07:32, Yayoi Ukai wrote: > >> I also thought that it was wrong that how some of the FFmpeg developer >> treated/regarded this Outreachy >> organization. For example, it seemed that Outreachy was regarded more >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-18 Thread wm4
On 16.09.2015 07:32, Yayoi Ukai wrote: I also thought that it was wrong that how some of the FFmpeg developer treated/regarded this Outreachy organization. For example, it seemed that Outreachy was regarded more like a source of cheap talented labor to accomplish FFmpeg agenda further rather

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-16 Thread anshul
On Monday 14 September 2015 10:50 PM, Nicolas George wrote: L'octidi 28 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : Looks mostly good to me. One thing I think that should be clarified is the meaning of "linear combination" - I assume you meant a non-trivial (exclude all zeros) linear

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-16 Thread Thilo Borgmann
Am 16.09.15 um 09:04 schrieb anshul: > > > On Monday 14 September 2015 10:50 PM, Nicolas George wrote: >> L'octidi 28 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : >>> Looks mostly good to me. One thing I think that should be clarified is >>> the meaning of "linear combination" - I assume

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-16 Thread Nicolas George
Le decadi 30 fructidor, an CCXXIII, anshul a écrit : > It looks like maintainer list is ignored. Like if there is maintainer of XYZ > feature. and decision of XYZ features are taken by committee then ignoring > him just because he don't have lots of commit would be bad idea. Maintainer > has taken

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-16 Thread Nicolas George
Le nonidi 29 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Yayoi Ukai a écrit : > > Thanks. You are right, this was imprecise. I meant linear combination with > > total coefficients one; barycenter in other words. For example: 10 commits > > are ok, 20 devel mails are ok, then 5 commits and 10 devel mails are ok too. >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-15 Thread Yayoi Ukai
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Nicolas George wrote: > L'octidi 28 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : >> Looks mostly good to me. One thing I think that should be clarified is >> the meaning of "linear combination" - I assume you meant a non-trivial >>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-14 Thread Nicolas George
L'octidi 28 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Nicolas George a écrit : > I have been thinking of a practical proposal myself, I will word it and post > it shortly. Here it is. Please comment. > I strongly think that we will able to reach unanimous consensus about the > members of the second stage list, and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-14 Thread Nicolas George
L'octidi 28 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : > Looks mostly good to me. One thing I think that should be clarified is > the meaning of "linear combination" - I assume you meant a non-trivial > (exclude all zeros) linear combination over the nonnegative integers? Thanks. You are

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-14 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Nicolas George wrote: > L'octidi 28 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Nicolas George a écrit : >> I have been thinking of a practical proposal myself, I will word it and post >> it shortly. > > Here it is. Please comment. Looks mostly good to me. One thing

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-14 Thread Nicolas George
L'octidi 28 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > saying "no" to a candidate here does not require prior problems or > hate between the people but it will lead to that afterwards at least > to some extend. very little in some, quite a bit in others. > people have different points

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-13 Thread Nicolas George
Le septidi 27 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : > I assume changing the metric if and when a merge happens from libav is > going to be handled by the first voting committee. The idea was to have an initial list without possible objections. It is expected that some of the first

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-13 Thread Ganesh Ajjanagadde
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > Hi, > > as discussed in the last IRC meeting, we settle some simple criteria > to define what an active developer is, based on the commit count. > > We are aware that such metrics are flawed in many ways, but since we

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-13 Thread Michael Niedermayer
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:36:29AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Le septidi 27 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > > Having a team vote about members of the team can be problematic, > > > > For example if one member votes against another, it wont help > > team spirit and

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Voting committee

2015-09-13 Thread Nicolas George
Le septidi 27 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > Having a team vote about members of the team can be problematic, > > For example if one member votes against another, it wont help > team spirit and social relations. If two people do not get along to the point that one would