[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread Benjamin Larsson
Benjamin Larsson ba...@ludd.ltu.se added the comment: Sources are there, license is there and Michael is credited for the H264 decoder. Looks ok to me, I vote for removal from the shame list. MvH Benjamin Larsson _ FFmpeg issue tracker

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@rainbow.studorg.tuwien.ac.at added the comment: When I originally read (and wrote) that the version of libavcodec that was used is under GPL, I did not test myself, but believed the author. When Dark Shikari wrote so he can replace the GPL libavcodec with an LGPL one, I

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread Diego Biurrun
Diego Biurrun di...@biurrun.de added the comment: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:55:31AM +, Benjamin Larsson wrote: Benjamin Larsson ba...@ludd.ltu.se added the comment: Sources are there, license is there and Michael is credited for the H264 decoder. Looks ok to me, I vote for

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread Benjamin Larsson
Benjamin Larsson ba...@ludd.ltu.se added the comment: Diego Biurrun wrote: Diego Biurrun di...@biurrun.de added the comment: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:55:31AM +, Benjamin Larsson wrote: Benjamin Larsson ba...@ludd.ltu.se added the comment: Sources are there, license is there and

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: I took the code from ffdhsow. I was not even aware of any #if CONFIG_GPL lines or even that there was the possibility to compile for GPL or LGPL. The license file in ffdshow continues to show LGPL. So you need to put those guys in the Hall of

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: Here's a link to the original ffdshow file that I took it from: http://ffdshow-tryout.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ffdshow- tryout/trunk/src/ffmpeg/libavcodec/dsputil.c? revision=1834view=markup You can see the #if GPL_CONFIG are commented out. So

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com added the comment: That license claim is not true. On SF, ffdshow claims to be GPL. http://sourceforge.net/projects/ffdshow/. Where do they claim to be LGPL? _ FFmpeg issue tracker iss...@roundup.ffmpeg.org

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: The license file in the ffmpeg directory says LGPL: http://ffdshow.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ffdshow/trunk/src/ff mpeg/COPYING?revision=2471view=markup Anyway, I have removed DGAVCDec from existence completely. Why can't this whole silly busy go

[issue1182] Doesn't build on ia64 arch with --enable-shared

2009-12-03 Thread Christian Marillat
Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr added the comment: Sorry for the delay. I did a svn build today with --enable-hardcoded-tables without problem. Thanks for your work. Christian Christian _ FFmpeg issue tracker iss...@roundup.ffmpeg.org

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: The license file in the ffmpeg directory says LGPL: http://ffdshow.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ffdshow/trunk/src/ff mpeg/COPYING?revision=2471view=markup Anyway, I have removed DGAVCDec from existence completely. Why can't this whole silly busy go

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: I only use the ffmpeg subdir from ffdshow. I'm telling you, this is all a misunderstanding and there is no shame to be assigned here. I've deleted the project from existence. So please delete this Hall of Shame entry. And I don't know why your

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread Vitor
Vitor vitor1...@gmail.com added the comment: Confirmed that it is not been distributed anymore, removed from shame. -- status: open - closed substatus: reproduced - fixed _ FFmpeg issue tracker iss...@roundup.ffmpeg.org

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: Thank you for removing the Hall of Shame entry. If it doesn't violate the LGPL, we should confirm it is safe to put it back online... The code as compiled, due to the fact that ffdshow-tryout has it configured as GPL (though they include the

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@rainbow.studorg.tuwien.ac.at added the comment: I do not think your actions are sufficient to use FFmpeg in the future (but the project maintainer may see this differently and will hopefully comment). @Vitor: I would very much appreciate if you would wait for a comment

[issue1542] Improve ape decoding performance

2009-12-03 Thread Loren Merritt
Loren Merritt lor...@u.washington.edu added the comment: ffape uses sse2 but not mmx. -- substatus: needs_more_info - analyzed _ FFmpeg issue tracker iss...@roundup.ffmpeg.org https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue1542

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: I do not think your actions are sufficient to use FFmpeg in the future Why do you think that? If I build the LGPL DLL as LGPL, I provide the source code, and I include the license, what is the problem?

[issue1542] Improve ape decoding performance

2009-12-03 Thread Loren Merritt
Loren Merritt lor...@u.washington.edu added the comment: fixed (I didn't benchmark the mmx version, I'm just assuming it's the complete explanation.) -- status: open - closed substatus: analyzed - fixed _ FFmpeg issue tracker

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: I have a lot of users that want this tool to continue. I don't need to do it. I do the work for free and offer it to the community. I have tried to adhere to the licensing and a misunderstanding occurred due to a mistake in another software

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: How will I know if and when the license has been reinstated? _ FFmpeg issue tracker iss...@roundup.ffmpeg.org https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue1451

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Ronald S. Bultje rsbul...@gmail.com added the comment: OK, let's take this easy, calm down, we're not the maffia and we're not gonna shoot you. Now, first, take a good night sleep. Second, you're a free project (as far as I can see), so we won't give you all that hard a time. Calm down, relax,

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread neuron2
neuron2 neur...@comcast.net added the comment: Did you consider solving the issue by distributing dgavcdec under the GPL? Yes, I don't want to do that. I only want to use the libavcodec DLL under its LGPL licensing. I assume it is licensed that way just to allow such cases. Isn't that what

[issue509] -*_mask -b mpeg12

2009-12-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at added the comment: Fixed in r20726. -- status: open - closed substatus: needs_more_info - fixed FFmpeg issue tracker iss...@roundup.ffmpeg.org https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue509

[issue1542] Improve ape decoding performance

2009-12-03 Thread Marcin Mirosław
Marcin Mirosław ffm...@mejor.pl added the comment: Hi, Thank you for quick fix! I'd like to make benchmark but unfortunately ffmpeg stop to decode ape files. It works in version 0.5_p20373 (SVN-r20373). Now ffmpeg shows only this: $ ffmpeg -i CD1.ape CDImage.wav FFmpeg version SVN-r20724,

[issue1451] License violation by DGAVCDec

2009-12-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at added the comment: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:53:01PM +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: I do not think your actions are sufficient to use FFmpeg in the future (but the project maintainer may see this differently and will hopefully comment). iam not sure

[issue538] Bug in libavcodec, reproducible with ffplay

2009-12-03 Thread Michael Niedermayer
Michael Niedermayer michae...@gmx.at added the comment: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:08:30PM +, Phoebe Lai wrote: I realized that I was using the wrong test file and thus generated a wrong report. My apologies!! The correct test file should be 1659-m_cut.3.mp4, which can be obtained from

[issue1182] Doesn't build on ia64 arch with --enable-shared

2009-12-03 Thread Reimar Döffinger
Reimar Döffinger b...@reimardoeffinger.de added the comment: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:35:15PM +, Christian Marillat wrote: Christian Marillat maril...@free.fr added the comment: Sorry for the delay. I did a svn build today with --enable-hardcoded-tables without problem. It is

[issue1182] Doesn't build on ia64 arch with --enable-shared

2009-12-03 Thread Diego Biurrun
Diego Biurrun di...@biurrun.de added the comment: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:35:15PM +, Christian Marillat wrote: Sorry for the delay. I did a svn build today with --enable-hardcoded-tables without problem. If the problem is fixed, please close the issue.