Am 28.10.2017 um 22:30 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
I believe I already tried to explain this in the past:
This isn't about "every usecase", I am also not claiming that
current FFmpeg git head contains no bugs, I am not even
claiming that current FFmpeg contains no regressions (although
this was
2017-10-28 22:29 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 28.10.2017 um 22:21 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
>>
>> 2017-10-28 22:16 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>>
I consider "cleanup" (the word that you strangely cut from the
quotes) in our environment
Am 28.10.2017 um 22:21 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
2017-10-28 22:16 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
I consider "cleanup" (the word that you strangely cut from the
quotes) in our environment an abuse, please be so kind as
to avoid using it here
it is your personal problem
Am 28.10.2017 um 22:20 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
2017-10-28 22:13 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
it's simply bull* that a random snapshot has always less bugs as
you pretend over years and that was provne in enough cases
alone over the last months
I assume you are
Am 28.10.2017 um 21:12 schrieb Lou Logan:
We never said that "nobody" should use releases–they may be more
convenient for distributors and those who require an unchanging API
(within the same major version). Feel free to use a release version if
you feel compelled to do so, but keep in mind
2017-10-28 22:16 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>> I consider "cleanup" (the word that you strangely cut from the
>> quotes) in our environment an abuse, please be so kind as
>> to avoid using it here
>
> it is your personal problem alone that you consider code-cleanup "abuse"
2017-10-28 22:13 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
> it's simply bull* that a random snapshot has always less bugs as
> you pretend over years and that was provne in enough cases
> alone over the last months
I assume you are talking about 3.4 because I hope you agree that
current
Am 28.10.2017 um 21:39 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
2017-10-28 21:37 GMT+02:00 Lou Logan :
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 11:13 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Please do me a favor and avoid this word at least here.
Thank you, Carl Eugen
Which word?
I consider "cleanup" (the word that
Am 28.10.2017 um 20:44 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
2017-10-28 20:31 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
i guess this only affects the current snapshot since releases
which nobody should use
You can use them as much as want, but you have to ask for
support where you downloaded
2017-10-28 21:59 GMT+02:00 Lou Logan :
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>> I consider "cleanup" (the word that you strangely cut from the
>> quotes) in our environment an abuse, please be so kind as
>> to avoid using it here.
>
> Please do me a favor
2017-10-28 0:24 GMT+02:00 Antonio Rolo :
> Hi,
> I would like to use the audio of video1.mp4 in video2.avi but can't manage to
> find the correct procedure. The 2 videos have exactly the same content but
> not the same duration. I tried to use "ffmpeg -i
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> I consider "cleanup" (the word that you strangely cut from the
> quotes) in our environment an abuse, please be so kind as
> to avoid using it here.
Please do me a favor and do not impose your peculiar behavior and
strange
2017-10-27 5:55 GMT+02:00 Steven Liu :
> Hi,
>
> I test with canvas of javascript(H5)
Why should they be supposed to output identical images?
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
2017-10-28 21:37 GMT+02:00 Lou Logan :
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 11:13 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> Please do me a favor and avoid this word at least here.
>>
>> Thank you, Carl Eugen
>
> Which word?
I consider "cleanup" (the word that you strangely cut from the
quotes) in our
2017-10-28 21:33 GMT+02:00 Paul B Mahol :
> On 10/28/17, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> 2017-10-28 21:12 GMT+02:00 Lou Logan :
>>> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i guess this only affects the current snapshot since
On 10/28/17, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2017-10-28 21:12 GMT+02:00 Lou Logan :
>> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> i guess this only affects the current snapshot since releases which
>>> nobody should use - yes, sarcasm - have no
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 11:13 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Please do me a favor and avoid this word at least here.
>
> Thank you, Carl Eugen
Which word?
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
2017-10-27 6:02 GMT+02:00 Steven Liu :
> 2017-10-27 5:10 GMT+08:00 Carl Eugen Hoyos :
>> 2017-10-26 17:09 GMT+02:00 Markku Vainio :
>>
>>> OK, guess someone from Intel just fixed this. Can you check and test this
>>> out?
>>>
2017-10-27 15:13 GMT+02:00 Kasper Folman :
> It looks like ffmpeg does not support dnxhd 1080p60 at all.
Do you have a 1080p60 sample file?
> The maximum is 1080p59,94. This is the case regardless of the input file.
>
> It states that the format is unsupported:
> ffmpeg -i
2017-10-28 21:12 GMT+02:00 Lou Logan :
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i guess this only affects the current snapshot since releases which
>> nobody should use - yes, sarcasm - have no problems
>
> I believe the git master branch is currently
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i guess this only affects the current snapshot since releases which
> nobody should use - yes, sarcasm - have no problems
I believe the git master branch is currently experiencing a cleanup and
merge cycle that has been postponed for some
2017-10-28 20:31 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
> i guess this only affects the current snapshot since releases
> which nobody should use
You can use them as much as want, but you have to ask for
support where you downloaded them.
Carl Eugen
22 matches
Mail list logo