On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:54 PM Lou Logan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, at 6:08 AM, Morgan Carr Markell wrote:
> > I'll have to ask the administrators for permission to install a more
> > recent version of ffmpeg.
>
> If they say no, and if you can download and execute files, just get it
> from:
>
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, at 6:08 AM, Morgan Carr Markell wrote:
> I'll have to ask the administrators for permission to install a more
> recent version of ffmpeg.
If they say no, and if you can download and execute files, just get it from:
https://johnvansickle.com/ffmpeg/
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 2:13 AM Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:44:13 +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > ffmpeg version 2.6.2 Copyright (c)
> > This is four years old, please test current FFmpeg git head.
>
> Indeed, a quick use of a search engine would have shown this issue:
>
On 3/1/19, Phil Rhodes wrote:
> > One more reason to not use old versions - bugs tend to get fixed. ;-)
> Bloody hell, do they?
> I shall have to have a look at all the issues that used to exist with
> colorimetry...
Consider donating some money or sponsor developers to speed up fixing
such issu
> One more reason to not use old versions - bugs tend to get fixed. ;-)
Bloody hell, do they?
I shall have to have a look at all the issues that used to exist with
colorimetry...
P
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org
Am 25.02.2019 um 15:34 schrieb Michael Koch:
Which is the recommended filter for a very strong contrast
enhancement, up to a factor of 10?
The eq=contrast=... filter allows only a maximum of 2. Could this be
changed to allow higher values?
As a workaround I'm using 3 or 4 cascaded eq filters.
On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 08:44:13 +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > ffmpeg version 2.6.2 Copyright (c)
> This is four years old, please test current FFmpeg git head.
Indeed, a quick use of a search engine would have shown this issue:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/4225
which was fixed with this co
