Am 02.12.20 um 20:49 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:33 AM Andy Sheimo wrote:
Actually having a static binary is not a no brainer. I know that I use a
static binary and I can make said static binary jump through hoops, but I
can't tell you why I use a static binary or the
Am 02.12.20 um 20:25 schrieb Andy Sheimo:
i just don't get the stupidity of the OP which can be solved by a little
child within 2 minutes of thinking in case of a slow brain
having a static binary somewhere is a no-brainer - period
Actually having a static binary is not a no brainer. I
On 2020-12-02T22:20:25+0100, hinderanyoption81 via ffmpeg-user
wrote:
> Do you know where I could get pre-built .LIB etc. files old enough to be used
> under Windows XP?
You could give https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=181802 a try.
--
Reino
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 8:51 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
> i don't give a shit about grammatically, capitals and commas (capitals
> and commas a for losers in every language)
>
Pop quiz: "grammatically" convert to noun...
> typically i speak programming languages
>
Good luck without capitals &
On 12/2/2020 1:20 PM, hinderanyoption81 via ffmpeg-user wrote:
Do you know where I could get pre-built .LIB etc. files old enough to be used
under Windows XP?
Perhaps the wayback machine or bitsavers has something. No chance you can
offload the processing to a more modern machine?
z!
Am 01.12.2020 um 19:56 schrieb Michael Koch:
Hello,
there seem to be some problems in the v360 filter with "perspective"
output.
Tested with the latest Windows built, 2 days old. You can reproduce
this with any equirectangular input image.
ffmpeg -i equirectangular_test.png -lavfi
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, December 2, 2020 1:42 PM, Gyan Doshi wrote:
> http://ffmpeg.org/download.html has couple of links to sources for
> Windows binaries, both static and shared. One of those is mine.
>
> Unless you need a custom build or non-free libraries, no one needs
On 12/2/2020 1:49 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:33 AM Andy Sheimo wrote:
Actually having a static binary is not a no brainer. I know that I use a
static binary and I can make said static binary jump through hoops, but I
can't tell you why I use a static binary or the
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:33 AM Andy Sheimo wrote:
> Actually having a static binary is not a no brainer. I know that I use a
> static binary and I can make said static binary jump through hoops, but I
> can't tell you why I use a static binary or the difference between that and
> a shared binary.
On 12/2/2020 1:37 PM, Glenn S. Odagawa via ffmpeg-user wrote:
On 12/2/2020 12:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.20 um 18:05 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
All this makes me wonder where all the built-up anger came from, and
why you bother even reading this mailing list. AFAIK you've never
On 12/2/2020 12:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.12.20 um 18:05 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
All this makes me wonder where all the built-up anger came from, and
why you bother even reading this mailing list. AFAIK you've never
actually answered a question
you have no idea how it sounds hen i
Adding on to what Gyan stated, if you really want to build your own there
are several projects on github that work well and could help you further
your education.
https://github.com/rdp/ffmpeg-windows-build-helpers
https://github.com/m-ab-s/media-autobuild_suite
good luck
>
>
> i just don't get the stupidity of the OP which can be solved by a little
> child within 2 minutes of thinking in case of a slow brain
>
> having a static binary somewhere is a no-brainer - period
>
Actually having a static binary is not a no brainer. I know that I use a
static binary and I
Am 02.12.20 um 18:05 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
All this makes me wonder where all the built-up anger came from, and why
you bother even reading this mailing list. AFAIK you've never actually
answered a question
you have no idea how it sounds hen i am angry
i just don't get the stupidity of the
On 02-12-2020 11:33 pm, Greg Oliver wrote:
...
been on this list long, but I can say that the strife of people looking for
non-existent windows binaries is frequent even though we know there are a
few shared library build as well as (at least one I know of) static build
with no dependencies.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 11:43 AM Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> On 12/2/2020 9:32 AM, hinderanyoption81 via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> > Upon reading the "Compilation Guide / MSVC on Wiki", I am confused about
> at least three issues.
> > 1. The Guide starts with a sentence "FFmpeg can be built on Windows with
On 12/2/2020 9:32 AM, hinderanyoption81 via ffmpeg-user wrote:
Upon reading the "Compilation Guide / MSVC on Wiki", I am confused about at
least three issues.
1. The Guide starts with a sentence "FFmpeg can be built on Windows with Visual
Studio", and then it says:
Finally, run: For MSVC:
Hi folks
Just to throw a further spanner in the works, this may be well known, but it's
worth saying anyway.
There's a pretty large difference between compiling "ffmpeg" and the "ffmpeg"
that you will get from, say, a website that offers a binary.
The very basic core of ffmpeg is probably not
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:32 AM hinderanyoption81 via ffmpeg-user
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Upon reading the "Compilation Guide / MSVC on Wiki", I am confused about at
> least three issues.
> 1. The Guide starts with a sentence "FFmpeg can be built on Windows with
> Visual Studio", and then it says:
>
Hello,
Upon reading the "Compilation Guide / MSVC on Wiki", I am confused about at
least three issues.
1. The Guide starts with a sentence "FFmpeg can be built on Windows with Visual
Studio", and then it says:
Finally, run: For MSVC:
./configure --toolchain=msvc
make
make install
First, this
On 12/2/2020 12:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i don't give a shit about grammatically, capitals and commas (capitals and
commas a for losers in every language)
OK, but that says a lot about how you think of other people and about any
desire to clearly communicate. (Two of the things it says are
> Hi Phil,
> (Deliberate top posting!)
>
> I can’t answer your question, but:
> I think this list has a policy where ‘anything goes, as there are not bad
> ideas, just differences in taste.’
> In (and that goes back thousands of years) history, ‘history’ is written by
> the ones who won the war,
Bouke (12020-12-02):
> So, I get flamed for top posting now, but I will NOT get banned.
> That’s a good thing.
You may not get explicitly banned, but they may get ignored by the
people who could have best answered their question.
Personally, I warn once, "please remember that top-posting is
Hi Phil,
(Deliberate top posting!)
I can’t answer your question, but:
I think this list has a policy where ‘anything goes, as there are not bad
ideas, just differences in taste.’
In (and that goes back thousands of years) history, ‘history’ is written by the
ones who won the war, not by the
I think it's worth asking a simple question, here. Who's actually in charge of
this mailing list - who has the authority to enforce the code of conduct? Who
actually owns any of this stuff?
It's never been clear.
P
On Wednesday, 2 December 2020, 09:34:30 GMT, Simon Brown
wrote:
>
> Simon, of course English isn't his first language, and truth be told, no
> one cares he's the English language equivalent of a word salad in a
> hurricane of cow patties.
> But mobilizing your hapless grab bag of language skills as your weapon of
> choice to prove that everyone else is the
i tryed the command
ffmpeg -i
http://myip:9985/stream/channel/8cfdf5a5ae10f5b0ef2a70383065aa93?ticket=8385CED480EFAB7574F62FB30503AA572991616E
-i ./logo.png -filter_complex "overlay=10:10" -f h264 udp://ipvps:1235
and in the pastebin you can see what happens...
https://pastebin.com/KKLhYVLu
but
Am 01.12.20 um 23:30 schrieb NotHarald Reindl:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 2:03 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
Pro Tip: When insulting people for being stupid, always make sure you use
language that avoids accidental self-owns
i don't give a shit about grammatically, capitals and commas (capitals
and
Hi there,
I am trying to find the documentation for a specific metadata tag:
'date'. According to the following page:
* https://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php/FFmpeg_Metadata
ffmpeg has a built-in mechanism for tag: 'title'. I also see that my
ffmpeg version has the same property for tag 'date'
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:42 AM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 08:57 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Malaterre
> :
>
> > > > $ ffmpeg -y -i input.avi -c:v libx264 -b:v 1321894 -pass 1 -an -f null
> > > > /dev/null && \
> > > > ffmpeg -y -i input.avi -c:v libx264 -b:v 1321894 -pass 2
30 matches
Mail list logo
