Re: [FFmpeg-user] Wanted: Fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics

2021-03-05 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 2021-03-05 21:31, pdr0 wrote: Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote On 2021-03-05 11:13, James Darnley wrote: On 05/03/2021, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: I seek a fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics. In my pursuit, I look for such a filter every time I peruse the filter docs for anyth

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Wanted: Fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics

2021-03-05 Thread pdr0
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote > On 2021-03-05 11:13, James Darnley wrote: >> On 05/03/2021, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) < > markfilipak@ > > wrote: >>> I seek a fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics. In my >>> pursuit, >>> I look for such a >>> filter every time I peruse the filter docs for

Re: [FFmpeg-user] hstack with one video offset in time?

2021-03-05 Thread Peter White
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:07:32PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:54 PM Peter White wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:33:10AM -0800, Steven Kan wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> I’d like to assemble these videos, side-by-side, but synced in time, > > which > > > >>> m

Re: [FFmpeg-user] hstack with one video offset in time?

2021-03-05 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:54 PM Peter White wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:33:10AM -0800, Steven Kan wrote: > > > > >>> > > >>> I’d like to assemble these videos, side-by-side, but synced in time, > which > > >>> means the TrailDown video needs to start 50 seconds after the TrailUp > > >>> v

Re: [FFmpeg-user] hstack with one video offset in time?

2021-03-05 Thread Michael Koch
Am 05.03.2021 um 20:33 schrieb Steven Kan: I’d like to assemble these videos, side-by-side, but synced in time, which means the TrailDown video needs to start 50 seconds after the TrailUp video. The TrailDown side can be black/blank, or it can be stuck on the first frame of its video while the ri

Re: [FFmpeg-user] hstack with one video offset in time?

2021-03-05 Thread Peter White
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:33:10AM -0800, Steven Kan wrote: > > >>> > >>> I’d like to assemble these videos, side-by-side, but synced in time, which > >>> means the TrailDown video needs to start 50 seconds after the TrailUp > >>> video. The TrailDown side can be black/blank, or it can be stuck o

Re: [FFmpeg-user] hstack with one video offset in time?

2021-03-05 Thread Steven Kan
>>> >>> I’d like to assemble these videos, side-by-side, but synced in time, which >>> means the TrailDown video needs to start 50 seconds after the TrailUp >>> video. The TrailDown side can be black/blank, or it can be stuck on the >>> first frame of its video while the right side plays for the

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Wanted: Fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics

2021-03-05 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 2021-03-05 11:13, James Darnley wrote: On 05/03/2021, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: I seek a fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics. In my pursuit, I look for such a filter every time I peruse the filter docs for anything. I've yet to find such a filter. Do you know of a fields-

[FFmpeg-user] Android Scudo FFMPEG crash

2021-03-05 Thread Michael Wood
Hi, I'm getting an occasional crash when trying to close h264 stream on Android. I'm using built from source ffmpeg 4.4-dev-416 ``` abort 0x00793ded6ee4 scudo::die() 0x00793decab04 scudo::ScopedErrorReport::~ScopedErrorReport() 0x00793decb190 scudo::reportHeaderCorruption(void*) 0x00

Re: [FFmpeg-user] matroska.h

2021-03-05 Thread Rob Hallam
Since no-one else has yet weighed in. On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 05:57, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > Please, enlighten this poor bastard. Doxygen is "a documentation generator and static analysis tool for software source trees". The first link you include is the source listing for matroska.h, a h

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Wanted: Fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics

2021-03-05 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 7:13 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > On 2021-03-05 10:35, pdr0 wrote: > > Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote > >> 'yadif=mode=send_field' is one way to convert fields to frames at the > same > >> frame size and twice the > >> FR. It does it by repeating fields, but it also adds

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Wanted: Fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics

2021-03-05 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 2021-03-05 10:35, pdr0 wrote: Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote 'yadif=mode=send_field' is one way to convert fields to frames at the same frame size and twice the FR. It does it by repeating fields, but it also adds cosmetics -- it is, after all, a motion interpolation filter. I seek a fields-to-

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Wanted: Fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics

2021-03-05 Thread James Darnley
On 05/03/2021, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > I seek a fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics. In my pursuit, > I look for such a > filter every time I peruse the filter docs for anything. I've yet to find > such a filter. > > Do you know of a fields-to-frames filter that does not add

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Wanted: Fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics

2021-03-05 Thread pdr0
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote > 'yadif=mode=send_field' is one way to convert fields to frames at the same > frame size and twice the > FR. It does it by repeating fields, but it also adds cosmetics -- it is, > after all, a motion > interpolation filter. > > I seek a fields-to-frames filter that d

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Wanted: Fields-to-frames filter that does not add cosmetics

2021-03-05 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 5:17 AM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > Hi All, > > 'yadif=mode=send_field' is one way to convert fields to frames at the same > frame size and twice the > FR. It does it by repeating fields, but it also adds cosmetics -- it is, > after all, a motion > interpolation filter.