Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> On 2021-04-01 13:40, pdr0 wrote:
>>
>> This zip file example has the original 24000/1001, weighted frame
>> blending
>> to 12/1001, and decimation to 6/1001 - is this something close to
>> what you had in mind ?
>> https://www.mediafire.com/file/qj819m3vctx4o4
On 2021-04-01 13:40, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
What I'm trying to do is make a 12/1001fps cfr in which each frame is
a proportionally weighted
pixel mix of the 24 picture-per-second original:
A B AAABB AABBB A.
I'm sure it would be way better than standard telecine
On 2021-04-01 13:40, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
What I'm trying to do is make a 12/1001fps cfr in which each frame is
a proportionally weighted
pixel mix of the 24 picture-per-second original:
A B AAABB AABBB A.
I'm sure it would be way better than standard telecine
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
>
> Is this another documentation problem?
>
> https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#fps-1
> "11.88 fps
> Convert the video to specified constant frame rate by duplicating or
> dropping frames as necessary."
>
> I want to duplicate (specifically, double and only doub
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> What I'm trying to do is make a 12/1001fps cfr in which each frame is
> a proportionally weighted
> pixel mix of the 24 picture-per-second original:
> A B AAABB AABBB A.
> I'm sure it would be way better than standard telecine -- zero judder --
> and I
On 2021-04-01 13:06, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
On 2021-04-01 11:41, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
On 2021-04-01 07:13, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
The source is MKV. MKV has a 1/1000 TB, so any PTS variance should be
less than 0.1%.
The filter complex is thinned down
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> On 2021-04-01 11:41, pdr0 wrote:
>> Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
>>> On 2021-04-01 07:13, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
The source is MKV. MKV has a 1/1000 TB, so any PTS variance should be
less than 0.1%.
The filter complex is thinned down to just th
On 2021-04-01 11:41, pdr0 wrote:
> Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
>> On 2021-04-01 07:13, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
>>> The source is MKV. MKV has a 1/1000 TB, so any PTS variance should be
>>> less than 0.1%.
>>>
>>> The filter complex is thinned down to just this: settb=1/72,showinfo
>>>
>>>
On 2021-04-01 11:41, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
On 2021-04-01 07:13, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
The source is MKV. MKV has a 1/1000 TB, so any PTS variance should be
less than 0.1%.
The filter complex is thinned down to just this: settb=1/72,showinfo
Here is selected lines
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> On 2021-04-01 07:13, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
>> The source is MKV. MKV has a 1/1000 TB, so any PTS variance should be
>> less than 0.1%.
>>
>> The filter complex is thinned down to just this: settb=1/72,showinfo
>>
>> Here is selected lines from the showinfo
On 2021-04-01 07:13, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
The source is MKV. MKV has a 1/1000 TB, so any PTS variance should be less than
0.1%.
The filter complex is thinned down to just this: settb=1/72,showinfo
Here is selected lines from the showinfo report (with ...comments):
[Parsed_showin
The source is MKV. MKV has a 1/1000 TB, so any PTS variance should be less than
0.1%.
The filter complex is thinned down to just this: settb=1/72,showinfo
Here is selected lines from the showinfo report (with ...comments):
[Parsed_showinfo_1 @ 0247d719ef00] config in time_base: 1/720
12 matches
Mail list logo
