Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg and libx264 presets and Constant Rate Factor (CRF)

2021-08-07 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Am Sa., 7. Aug. 2021 um 11:12 Uhr schrieb Bill Crockett : > If I choose a CRF of 20, and I use the "veryslow" preset, the quality will > still be the same if I choose a CRF of 20 and use the "superfast" preset? > > The same with this. If I choose a CRF of 10, and I use the "veryslow" > preset,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg and libx264 presets and Constant Rate Factor (CRF)

2021-08-07 Thread 于家傲
Sure it is. That’s why it’s called “constant visual quality”. The preset has (almost) nothing to do with quality. It only affects speed. > 在 2021年8月7日,下午5:06,Bill Crockett 写道: > > First of all, I am not doing 2 pass encoding. I am using the CRF option. > > They say for constant quality

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg and libx264 presets and Constant Rate Factor (CRF)

2021-08-07 Thread Def Etienne
> > On 7 Aug 2021, at 10:12, Bill Crockett wrote: > > First of all, I am not doing 2 pass encoding. I am using the CRF option. > > They say for constant quality encoding, you will save bitrate by choosing a > slower preset. A slower preset will provide better compression. > > ultrafast

[FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg and libx264 presets and Constant Rate Factor (CRF)

2021-08-07 Thread Bill Crockett
First of all, I am not doing 2 pass encoding. I am using the CRF option. They say for constant quality encoding, you will save bitrate by choosing a slower preset. A slower preset will provide better compression. ultrafast superfast veryfast faster fast medium – default preset slow slower