How about temporarily renaming the file at the start of the loop before any
processing happens?
ren %G temporary.mp3
processing commands on temporary.mp3
ren temporary.mp3 %G
And then just rename it back at the end of the loop, like that.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 at 22:32, CMG DiGiTaL wrote:
> hi
hi Reino,
thanks for the clarifications...
> FOR *%G* IN (*.mp3) DO (
Please don't do this. I understand you're trying to emphasize parts of
code...
it was because I took part of the sample rate command that you sent me
to be able to use it in my batch file that I already had here, you
On 2022-02-21T08:52:44+0100, CMG DiGiTaL wrote:
> I did these commands below
This has nothing to with your initial question "Get sample rate in mp3 files",
or even FFmpeg. This is in fact a question about CMD and Batch.
I will respond to this now, but I don't believe questions like these are
On 2022-02-21 09:25, Stephen Liu via ffmpeg-user wrote:
Hi all,
I have video captured on V8 tapes in about 1990. They are low resolution
video. Recently I sent the tape to a profession shop ripping them on DVD. I
have ripped the DVD to computer as .VOB files. On the whole their quality is
I've written a batch file to split up a source file into individual files
by GOP. I'm using an input file that has only a single video stream, as
audio and other streams seemed to only make other problems arise, or
perhaps was simply making this same issue have even worse consequences.
The
Am 21.02.22 um 15:25 schrieb Stephen Liu via ffmpeg-user:
Hi all,
I have video captured on V8 tapes in about 1990. They are low resolution
video. Recently I sent the tape to a profession shop ripping them on DVD. I
have ripped the DVD to computer as .VOB files. On the whole their quality
Hi all,
I have video captured on V8 tapes in about 1990. They are low resolution
video. Recently I sent the tape to a profession shop ripping them on DVD. I
have ripped the DVD to computer as .VOB files. On the whole their quality is
not so bad except those video taken in-door then the
No worries. I'll push it back to -40 and see how it goes. We have a
buidling full of people today so I'll give it a go either later or
tomorrow morning.
On Mon, 2022-02-21 at 12:39 +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:34 PM Julian Pilfold-Bagwell <
>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:34 PM Julian Pilfold-Bagwell <
julian.pilfoldbagw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
>
> Well, that certainly did the job with the only mod being the db level
> going to -20.
>
That is too low quality or perhaps if you do not use RMS detector but peak
one than threshold
Hi Paul,
Well, that certainly did the job with the only mod being the db level
going to -20.
Thanks again for your help, really appreciate it.
All the best,
Jools
On Sun, 2022-02-20 at 13:01 +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:33 PM Julian Pilfold-Bagwell <
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
