Am 31.03.22 um 22:19 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
P.S.: Let's see what kind of insults this contribution provokes.
Provocations are not tolerated here
lol
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Am 31.03.22 um 21:56 schrieb Wolfgang Hugemann:
because I can create .bat files and convert multiple files at once.
The original FLAC encoder also has a command line interface, and I
actually used it for bulk conversion of WAVs via batch. For just audio
conversion, I would rather use the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:12 PM Wolfgang Hugemann wrote:
> I would rather use FLACs original frontend (than ffmpeg), which also
> provides a nice Windows GUI interface. FLAC conversion is also included
> in a variety of software products, i.e. Exact Audio Copy, which I used
> to rip all my music
because I can create .bat files and convert multiple files at once.
The original FLAC encoder also has a command line interface, and I
actually used it for bulk conversion of WAVs via batch. For just audio
conversion, I would rather use the original software than ffmpeg.
In regard to VBR: I
On Wednesday, March 30, 2022, 03:39:41 PM PDT, CMG DiGiTaL
wrote:
Em qua., 30 de mar. de 2022 às 07:27, CMG DiGiTaL
escreveu:
> Better use ebur128 scanner filter, it is much faster, after it reports
>> values, just apply volume filter.
>>
>
>
>> loudnorm dynamic processing is not
