Am 04.02.21 um 09:12 schrieb Korn Moffle:
unsubscribe me
idiot - how dumb are you when you believe writing that into a random
answer with a random subject could work?
> ___
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/
complaining, submit a patch" [was: Re:
minterpolate problem]
On Monday, 1 February 2021, 23:36:19 GMT, Jim DeLaHunt
wrote:
> In many projects, "instead of complaining, submit a patch" is good
> advice. It turns users into contributors. But FFmpeg is not just any> projec
On 2021-02-02 12:29, Michael Koch wrote:
Another suggestion: A programmer who adds a new feature to FFmpeg
shouldn't write the documentation for this feature himself. Because
for him everything is totally clear and he forgets to describe some
important details. It's better if someone else test
On 02/02/2021 04:23 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
Am 02.02.2021 um 22:05 schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg):
On 02/02/2021 03:29 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
-snip-
In my opinion, it would be best to have all documentation in a wiki.
A wiki? Available to all to modify?
Available to all who are registered t
Am 02.02.2021 um 22:05 schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg):
On 02/02/2021 03:29 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
-snip-
In my opinion, it would be best to have all documentation in a wiki.
A wiki? Available to all to modify?
Available to all who are registered to the wiki. Why not? The wiki has a
history
On 02/02/2021 03:29 PM, Michael Koch wrote:
-snip-
In my opinion, it would be best to have all documentation in a wiki.
A wiki? Available to all to modify? I respectfully disagree.
Another suggestion: A programmer who adds a new feature to FFmpeg shouldn't write the documentation
for this fea
On Tuesday, 2 February 2021, 20:29:44 GMT, Michael Koch
wrote:
> In my opinion, it would be best to have all documentation in a wiki.
I think that's probably a good idea. For something the size and complexity of
ffmpeg, trying to embed the documentation into the executable is crazy.
> Another
Am 02.02.2021 um 19:54 schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg):
Is there a middle way? Is the choice really, 1, an automated system,
or 2, chaos?
How about a single person who receives all documentation submittals
and fits them into a documentation structure?
An editor.
That's how the non-coder world
Is there a middle way? Is the choice really, 1, an automated system, or 2,
chaos?
How about a single person who receives all documentation submittals and fits them into a
documentation structure?
An editor.
That's how the non-coder world works. And it works well. And it's flexible. And it ca
On 2/2/2021 2:59 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
do you fucking idiot realize that i have *nothing* to do with the ffmpeg
project? i'm an ordinar yffmoeg user like you
Then why are you arguing about the tools that other people use? If it gets
the job done, use it. Oh, have have you ever tried serio
Chris Angelico (12021-02-02):
> And Phil learned basic courtesy.
You mistake the absence of profanity with courtesy. It is a common
mistake.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-us
Am 02.02.21 um 12:13 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:00 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 02.02.21 um 11:54 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
On Tuesday, 2 February 2021, 10:17:11 GMT, Reindl Harald
wrote:
(snip)
Well, you just keep telling yourself all that, and w
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:00 PM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 02.02.21 um 11:54 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, 2 February 2021, 10:17:11 GMT, Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> > (snip)
> > Well, you just keep telling yourself all that, and we'll keep admiring the
>
Am 02.02.21 um 11:54 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
On Tuesday, 2 February 2021, 10:17:11 GMT, Reindl Harald
wrote:
(snip)
Well, you just keep telling yourself all that, and we'll keep admiring the
fantastic documentation ffmpeg has. Obviously, it's a brilliant endorsement of
On Tuesday, 2 February 2021, 10:17:11 GMT, Reindl Harald
wrote:
(snip)
Well, you just keep telling yourself all that, and we'll keep admiring the
fantastic documentation ffmpeg has. Obviously, it's a brilliant endorsement of
whatever your approach is.
You have people offering to do free
Am 02.02.21 um 11:11 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
On Tuesday, 2 February 2021, 10:04:44 GMT, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> sorry but in most cases when someone comes up with word/excel files> instead
of pure plaintext things only become worser and that will not> change in 100 yea
On Tuesday, 2 February 2021, 10:04:44 GMT, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> sorry but in most cases when someone comes up with word/excel files> instead
> of pure plaintext things only become worser and that will not> change in 100
> years
I'm going to assume from that you've never worked on
Am 02.02.21 um 10:46 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
On Tuesday, 2 February 2021, 06:30:35 GMT, Reindl Harald
wrote:
muhahaha - a word document is how writers work?
Yeah. I mean, think about it - how else are you going to track changes in a
document?
I guess you could improvi
On Tuesday, 2 February 2021, 06:30:35 GMT, Reindl Harald
wrote:
> muhahaha - a word document is how writers work?
Yeah. I mean, think about it - how else are you going to track changes in a
document?
I guess you could improvise some sort of solution by, I don't know, sending
each other
Am 02.02.21 um 07:39 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
On 2/1/2021 10:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
muhahaha - a word document is how writers work?
in case microsoft office (or libre office writer) is the solution i
want my problem back
So far off-topic, but YES, most writers (technical, legal, fiction,
On 2/1/2021 10:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
muhahaha - a word document is how writers work?
in case microsoft office (or libre office writer) is the solution i want my
problem back
So far off-topic, but YES, most writers (technical, legal, fiction, and
otherwise) work in ms-word (with the occ
Am 02.02.21 um 01:12 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
The way it would usually work, if someone was willing to do some pro bono
technical writing, is that it'd be written as a word document, because that's
how writers work, revised using the features built into word documents for that
e
On Monday, 1 February 2021, 23:36:19 GMT, Jim DeLaHunt
wrote:
> In many projects, "instead of complaining, submit a patch" is good
> advice. It turns users into contributors. But FFmpeg is not just any> project.
Quite. Knowing what I know, I'd sooner eat catfood than submit changes to
ffmp
On 2021-01-31 05:05, Rodney Baker wrote:
On Friday, 29 January 2021 21:12:06 ACDT Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
On Friday, 29 January 2021, 09:43:09 GMT, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
wrote:
Try 'ffmpeg -h type=filter.
It fails. Why? Because "filter" is a "type", not a "name" -- never mind
24 matches
Mail list logo
