Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Mark Filipak
On 03/04/2020 05:12 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: On 03/04/2020 05:02 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: On 03/04/2020 04:51 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Carl

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: > > > On 03/04/2020 05:02 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: >>> On 03/04/2020 04:51 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: > On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote: >>>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Mark Filipak
On 03/04/2020 05:02 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: On 03/04/2020 04:51 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote: On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Not 100% correct.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: > On 03/04/2020 04:51 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: >>> On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> Not 100% correct. > > Which part? (And

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Mark Filipak
On 03/04/2020 04:51 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote: On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Not 100% correct. Which part? (And does it need to be, anyway? Analogies often aren't but still

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: > On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote: >>> On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Not 100% correct. >>> >>> Which part? (And does it need to be, anyway? Analogies often aren't but >>> still get the points across.) >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Mark Filipak
On 03/04/2020 11:14 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote: On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Not 100% correct. Which part? (And does it need to be, anyway? Analogies often aren't but still get the points across.) CPU and GPU... Hi, and thanks for the criticism, I

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/4/20, Carl Zwanzig wrote: > On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> Not 100% correct. > > Which part? (And does it need to be, anyway? Analogies often aren't but > still get the points across.) CPU and GPU... > > z! > ___ > ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Carl Zwanzig
On 3/4/2020 7:39 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Not 100% correct. Which part? (And does it need to be, anyway? Analogies often aren't but still get the points across.) z! ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 3/4/20, Mark Filipak wrote: > I thought further and decided to redo my FPGA presentation with better > analogies. I hope you enjoy it. > > Starting with the basics: Logic gates come in 2 flavors: AND and OR; and > it's from them, alone, that all other digital elements are made. > > FSMs

[FFmpeg-user] FPGAs

2020-03-04 Thread Mark Filipak
I thought further and decided to redo my FPGA presentation with better analogies. I hope you enjoy it. Starting with the basics: Logic gates come in 2 flavors: AND and OR; and it's from them, alone, that all other digital elements are made. FSMs (finite state machines) are complex