On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Wolfgang Hugemann wrote:
>
> In regard to the other comment: I knew that Cygwin is an option, but my
> main intent is to completely automise standard operations, such that all my
> colleagues can perform them without thinking about what happens exactly.
> Installi
> This works for me in the cmd shell on Win7:
> type *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -i - {encoding options) output.ext
> In any case, dir /b produces a listing. cat/type emit the data of the
> operands.
Thanks. This command line does the job. My problem was that I did not really
know what exact
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Wolfgang Hugemann wrote:
> > e.g. cat *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 25 -i - out.mp4
>
> Does piping really work under Windows? The Windows equivalent to 'cat'
> would be 'dir /b'. But changing the command line this way creates an error
> that basically
Am 23.05.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Wolfgang Hugemann:
e.g. cat *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 25 -i - out.mp4
Does piping really work under Windows? The Windows equivalent to 'cat' would be
'dir /b'. But changing the command line this way creates an error that
basically says that the
> e.g. cat *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 25 -i - out.mp4
Does piping really work under Windows? The Windows equivalent to 'cat' would be
'dir /b'. But changing the command line this way creates an error that
basically says that the input stream is empty.
I couldn't find any example
2017-05-22 17:50 GMT+02:00 Bouke / VideoToolShed :
> Piping is a bad idea, it craps out after some 40 images in my experience.
> (Pipe to pipe to pipe to….)
Then you have a problem in the way you do your pipe. At least on
linux-like systems, cat *.png will only pipe from the cat process to
ffmp
> On 22 May 2017, at 17:36, Wolfgang Hugemann wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I have a bunch of images that I want to convert into a video. These are,
> however, not numbered consecuitively (not like 001.jpg, 002.jpg, ...).
>
> Well, I could make a copy of each and rename them in such a pattern, but is
>
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Wolfgang Hugemann wrote:
> How about piping?
>
Pipiing or the concat demuxer can work.
e.g. cat *.jpg | ffmpeg -f image2pipe -framerate 25 -i - out.mp4
See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40870357/input-parameters-to-ffmpeg
__
Hey,
I have a bunch of images that I want to convert into a video. These are,
however, not numbered consecuitively (not like 001.jpg, 002.jpg, ...).
Well, I could make a copy of each and rename them in such a pattern, but is
there a more elegant way to perform the job? File name globbing is obv
