> Why do you believe the result is CFR, or rather different than the source?
I checked that with a couple of different programs (MediaInfo, AVIdemux
and ffmpeg). It may not be a general problem, as the slide show example
as suggested by pdr0 (see my answer to that) works if you specify -vsync
vfr
On 24-01-2021 10:44 pm, Wolfgang Hugemann wrote:
Use -vsync 0. No addiitional frames should be added.
Well, this is true, but the video is switched to cfr. As I said, I tried
this too. And usin mkv or webm instead of mp4 make no difference.
Why do you believe the result is CFR, or rather
> Use -vsync 0. No addiitional frames should be added.
Well, this is true, but the video is switched to cfr. As I said, I tried
this too. And usin mkv or webm instead of mp4 make no difference.
ffmpeg -y -i kollision.mp4 -vf boxblur=10:1 -vsync 0 -copyts blur.mp4
gives the output:
ffmpeg
On 23-01-2021 11:52 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Sa., 23. Jan. 2021 um 19:19 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Hugemann :
I have a vfr mp4 video from a private security cam with a very specific
pts pattern. The duration of the frames is
80-80-40-80-80-40-80-80-40-... ms.
I would like to hand this video
Am Sa., 23. Jan. 2021 um 19:19 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Hugemann :
>
> I have a vfr mp4 video from a private security cam with a very specific
> pts pattern. The duration of the frames is
> 80-80-40-80-80-40-80-80-40-... ms.
>
> I would like to hand this video to others as a demonstration of vfr
>
I have a vfr mp4 video from a private security cam with a very specific
pts pattern. The duration of the frames is
80-80-40-80-80-40-80-80-40-... ms.
I would like to hand this video to others as a demonstration of vfr
video, but have to blur it in order to preserve privacy.
I tried something