> > > So I've been running FATE on current `master` all the way back to
> > > `3c700c82cbee49d1f40b6a7063f4b084ae3ee747` and I can't seem to get far
> > > with it, one of these two always fail:
> > >
> > > - ./tests/ref/fate/filter-earwax
> > > - ./tests/ref/lavf/mxf
> > >
> > > Are these tests
Am Fr., 29. Jan. 2021 um 20:49 Uhr schrieb Armin Hasitzka :
>
> > So I've been running FATE on current `master` all the way back to
> > `3c700c82cbee49d1f40b6a7063f4b084ae3ee747` and I can't seem to get far
> > with it, one of these two always fail:
> >
> > - ./tests/ref/fate/filter-earwax
> > -
> > So I've been running FATE on current `master` all the way back to
> > `3c700c82cbee49d1f40b6a7063f4b084ae3ee747` and I can't seem to get far
> > with it, one of these two always fail:
> >
> > - ./tests/ref/fate/filter-earwax
> > - ./tests/ref/lavf/mxf
> >
> > Are these tests flaky, am I doing
Am 29.01.21 um 21:43 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:19 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 29.01.21 um 20:21 schrieb Armin Hasitzka:
For release versions, one just make sure that FATE report is not
yellow.
Alright, that sounds simple enough; CI testing for the win \o/
Much
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:19 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.01.21 um 20:21 schrieb Armin Hasitzka:
> >>> For release versions, one just make sure that FATE report is not
> yellow.
> >>
> >> Alright, that sounds simple enough; CI testing for the win \o/
> >>
> >> Much appreciated + thanks
Am 29.01.21 um 20:21 schrieb Armin Hasitzka:
For release versions, one just make sure that FATE report is not yellow.
Alright, that sounds simple enough; CI testing for the win \o/
Much appreciated + thanks for your hard work <3
So I've been running FATE on current `master` all the way
>> For release versions, one just make sure that FATE report is not yellow.
>
> Alright, that sounds simple enough; CI testing for the win \o/
>
> Much appreciated + thanks for your hard work <3
So I've been running FATE on current `master` all the way back to
Am 29.01.21 um 20:58 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
On 1/29/2021 11:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
All of which need to be installed and configured.
for the sake of god download https://ffmpeg.org/download.html#build-windows
no need for native windows binaries at a
Except the many cases where
there
On 1/29/2021 11:37 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
on the machine i am using right now i type "dnf install whatever", works
fine for 15 years
That's great. (I use pkg on freebsd and it works very well.)
Aside from dnf not being 15 years old, not everyone is using that particular
linux distro; heck,
> So I've been running FATE on current `master` all the way back to
> `3c700c82cbee49d1f40b6a7063f4b084ae3ee747` and I can't seem to get far
> with it, one of these two always fail:
>
> - ./tests/ref/fate/filter-earwax
> - ./tests/ref/lavf/mxf
>
> Are these tests flaky, am I doing something wrong
Am 29.01.21 um 20:38 schrieb Wolfgang Hugemann:
why should they?
there are enough distributions and compilers
Because the average user cannot compile code her-/himself.
that's what linux distributions for
Especially on
Windows, it is not that easy to compile ffmpeg. (Well, I succeeded
> why should they?
> there are enough distributions and compilers
Because the average user cannot compile code her-/himself. Especially on
Windows, it is not that easy to compile ffmpeg. (Well, I succeeded at last.)
I provide some scripts that perform regular tasks for image and video
processing
Am 29.01.21 um 20:28 schrieb Carl Zwanzig:
On 1/29/2021 11:00 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
most open source projects don't provide binaries
Maybe yes, maybe no. Most of the FOSS software I use* comes as compiled
executables, often with an install process. And there is a fair
difference
On 1/29/2021 11:00 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
most open source projects don't provide binaries
Maybe yes, maybe no. Most of the FOSS software I use* comes as compiled
executables, often with an install process. And there is a fair difference
logically between libraries and executables; the
Am 29.01.21 um 19:56 schrieb Wolfgang Hugemann:
What may be confusing for a ffmpeg newbie, is that ffmpeg.org does not
provide executables. I guess this is because of patent issues. (It was
the same with the MP3 encoder lame for years.) This could possibly be
somewhat explained on the ffmpeg
I hope that I'm not starting this discussion all over again ...
I have been supporting ImageMagick for years now, where there are also
have no 'stable releases', and I understand that its developers just
don't have the manpower to support these.
ImageMagick does have version numbering, but the
: mardi 26 janvier 2021 18:09
À : FFmpeg user questions
Objet : Re: [FFmpeg-user] Next Release
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Armin Hasitzka :
> Given that FFmpeg has been released on an almost
> monthly basis before that
Nearly one year passed between 4.2 and 4.3.
We rec
On 1/26/2021 1:03 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 22:00 schrieb MADOVSKY:
On 1/26/2021 12:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
you still will be a security risk running on two legs tomorrow
for now the security risk is your disrespectful behavior on this
mailing list, insulting and
Am 26.01.21 um 22:00 schrieb MADOVSKY:
On 1/26/2021 12:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
you still will be a security risk running on two legs tomorrow
for now the security risk is your disrespectful behavior on this mailing
list, insulting and harassing, bullying every one
not everyone, only
On 1/26/2021 12:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:47 schrieb MADOVSKY:
On 1/26/2021 12:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:27 schrieb MADOVSKY:
On 1/26/2021 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:17 schrieb MADOVSKY:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:07 schrieb
Am 26.01.21 um 21:47 schrieb MADOVSKY:
On 1/26/2021 12:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:27 schrieb MADOVSKY:
On 1/26/2021 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:17 schrieb MADOVSKY:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:07 schrieb MADOVSKY:
You know what Mr Harald?
GFY
On 1/26/2021 12:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:27 schrieb MADOVSKY:
On 1/26/2021 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:17 schrieb MADOVSKY:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:07 schrieb MADOVSKY:
You know what Mr Harald?
GFY
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
Am 26.01.21 um 21:27 schrieb MADOVSKY:
On 1/26/2021 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:17 schrieb MADOVSKY:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:07 schrieb MADOVSKY:
You know what Mr Harald?
GFY
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
still
On 1/26/2021 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:17 schrieb MADOVSKY:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:07 schrieb MADOVSKY:
You know what Mr Harald?
GFY
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
still on WinXP - breaking news: we have 2021 now
Am 26.01.21 um 21:17 schrieb MADOVSKY:
Am 26.01.21 um 21:07 schrieb MADOVSKY:
You know what Mr Harald?
GFY
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
still on WinXP - breaking news: we have 2021 now
what's the purpose of your harassment? I
Am 26.01.21 um 21:07 schrieb MADOVSKY:
You know what Mr Harald?
GFY
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
still on WinXP - breaking news: we have 2021 now
what's the purpose of your harassment? I love XP and it's not your
F problem.
Hello all,
I'm going to ask everyone to take a break from this thread. It is no longer
about ffmpeg.
Thank you.
-m
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above,
Am 26.01.21 um 21:07 schrieb MADOVSKY:
You know what Mr Harald?
GFY
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
still on WinXP - breaking news: we have 2021 now
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
You know what Mr Harald?
GFY
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
Am 26.01.21 um 20:56 schrieb MADOVSKY:
On 1/26/2021 11:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
On 1/26/2021 11:52 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 20:48 schrieb MADOVSKY:
Am 26.01.21 um 20:28 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:25 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 20:23 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:18 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 20:48 schrieb MADOVSKY:
Am 26.01.21 um 20:28 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:25 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 20:23 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:18 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Chris Angelico:
Am 26.01.21 um 20:47 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:44 PM Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user <
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2021, 19:10:38 GMT, Chris Angelico <
ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
Do you realise how toxic you make the FFMPEG community look?
To
Am 26.01.21 um 20:28 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:25 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 20:23 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:18 AM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:36 AM Reindl
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:44 PM Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user <
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 January 2021, 19:10:38 GMT, Chris Angelico <
> ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Do you realise how toxic you make the FFMPEG community look?
>
> To answer your last point first, either
Am 26.01.21 um 20:33 schrieb Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user:
As regards the issue of release versions, the way I usually do it is to download a
statically-built executable. As a windows person I'd invariably do this anyway; I have
built ffmpeg on windows but it's a real hurt in the hiney. There
On Tuesday, 26 January 2021, 19:10:38 GMT, Chris Angelico
wrote:
> Do you realise how toxic you make the FFMPEG community look?
To answer your last point first, either they don't know how toxic it looks, or
they don't care. It's been like this for so long that if it's an elaborate
trolling
Am 26.01.21 um 20:28 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:25 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 20:23 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:18 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:36 AM Reindl
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:25 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 26.01.21 um 20:23 schrieb Chris Angelico:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:18 AM Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 26.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Chris Angelico:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:36 AM Reindl Harald
> >>>
Am 26.01.21 um 20:23 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:18 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:36 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
the unknown ones breaking workloads you didn't think of in your tests is
the problem and
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:18 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 26.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Chris Angelico:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:36 AM Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >> the unknown ones breaking workloads you didn't think of in your tests is
> >> the problem and hence only idiots running
Am 26.01.21 um 19:43 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:36 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
the unknown ones breaking workloads you didn't think of in your tests is
the problem and hence only idiots running git-snapshots in production
Lovely. You just called me an idiot to my face.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:36 AM Reindl Harald wrote:
> the unknown ones breaking workloads you didn't think of in your tests is
> the problem and hence only idiots running git-snapshots in production
Lovely. You just called me an idiot to my face.
For the record, not FFMPEG, but I have
Am 26.01.21 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas George:
Carl Zwanzig (12021-01-26):
What is "invalid" there? linux does point releases, so does freebsd,
firefox, python, bind, glib, clang, etc. Find me a major opensource project,
other than ffmpeg, that tells people to use their development branch.
Carl Zwanzig (12021-01-26):
> What is "invalid" there? linux does point releases, so does freebsd,
> firefox, python, bind, glib, clang, etc. Find me a major opensource project,
> other than ffmpeg, that tells people to use their development branch.
Debian. The number of things based on Sid, or
On 1/26/2021 10:23 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:12 PM Carl Zwanzig wrote:
Have to agree, pretty much _every_other_ opensource project* manages
x.y or x.y.z releases and _doesn't_ support (whatever that even means)
their git head or development branches.
That is invalid
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 19:09 Uhr schrieb Armin Hasitzka :
>
> > Nearly one year passed between 4.2 and 4.3.
> >
> > We recommend that all users download current
> > FFmpeg git head as we lack the manpower to
> > support other versions.
>
> Fair enough, thanks for that insight :) Out of curiosity
Am 26.01.21 um 19:33 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 19:29 Uhr schrieb Reindl Harald
:
Am 26.01.21 um 19:23 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 19:04 Uhr schrieb Reindl Harald
:
nobody on this planet can assure that a random
git-snapshot is error free and
Am 26.01.21 um 19:29 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 26.01.21 um 19:23 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 19:04 Uhr schrieb Reindl Harald
:
nobody on this planet can assure that a random
git-snapshot is error free and everyone who
pretends that is either stupid or lying
This is
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 19:29 Uhr schrieb Reindl Harald
:
>
>
>
> Am 26.01.21 um 19:23 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> > Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 19:04 Uhr schrieb Reindl Harald
> > :
> >
> >> nobody on this planet can assure that a random
> >> git-snapshot is error free and everyone who
> >>
Am 26.01.21 um 19:23 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 19:04 Uhr schrieb Reindl Harald
:
nobody on this planet can assure that a random
git-snapshot is error free and everyone who
pretends that is either stupid or lying
This is an important point, thank you for making it!
Am 26.01.21 um 19:23 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:12 PM Carl Zwanzig wrote:
On 1/26/2021 10:03 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 18:59 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
This is invalid
I'm starting to think that when Paul says "invalid" he means "I don't
agree
with you".
Am 26.01.21 um 19:22 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:13 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 19:09 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:04 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 18:59 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:50 PM Reindl Harald
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 19:04 Uhr schrieb Reindl Harald
:
> nobody on this planet can assure that a random
> git-snapshot is error free and everyone who
> pretends that is either stupid or lying
This is an important point, thank you for making it!
Of course, every random git-snapshots has many,
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:12 PM Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> On 1/26/2021 10:03 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Am 26.01.21 um 18:59 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> >> This is invalid
>
> I'm starting to think that when Paul says "invalid" he means "I don't
> agree
> with you".
>
> > it is *not* invalid
> >
> >
> For release versions, one just make sure that FATE report is not yellow.
Alright, that sounds simple enough; CI testing for the win \o/
Much appreciated + thanks for your hard work <3
Armin
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:13 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.01.21 um 19:09 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:04 PM Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 26.01.21 um 18:59 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:50 PM Reindl Harald
> >>> wrote:
>
Am 26.01.21 um 19:09 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:04 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 18:59 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:50 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 18:09 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb
On 1/26/2021 10:03 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 18:59 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
This is invalid
I'm starting to think that when Paul says "invalid" he means "I don't agree
with you".
it is *not* invalid
nobody on this planet can assure that a random git-snapshot is error free
and
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:09 PM Armin Hasitzka wrote:
> > Nearly one year passed between 4.2 and 4.3.
> >
> > We recommend that all users download current
> > FFmpeg git head as we lack the manpower to
> > support other versions.
>
> Fair enough, thanks for that insight :) Out of curiosity --
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:04 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.01.21 um 18:59 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:50 PM Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 26.01.21 um 18:09 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> >>> Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Armin Hasitzka <
> Nearly one year passed between 4.2 and 4.3.
>
> We recommend that all users download current
> FFmpeg git head as we lack the manpower to
> support other versions.
Fair enough, thanks for that insight :) Out of curiosity -- are there
any special (stability) checks you run for releasing versions
Am 26.01.21 um 18:59 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:50 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 18:09 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Armin Hasitzka <
ar...@grabyo.com>:
Given that FFmpeg has been released on an almost
monthly basis
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:50 PM Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.01.21 um 18:09 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> > Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Armin Hasitzka <
> ar...@grabyo.com>:
> >
> >> Given that FFmpeg has been released on an almost
> >> monthly basis before that
> >
> > Nearly
Am 26.01.21 um 18:09 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Armin Hasitzka :
Given that FFmpeg has been released on an almost
monthly basis before that
Nearly one year passed between 4.2 and 4.3.
you heard about point releases?
We recommend that all users
Am Di., 26. Jan. 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Armin Hasitzka :
> Given that FFmpeg has been released on an almost
> monthly basis before that
Nearly one year passed between 4.2 and 4.3.
We recommend that all users download current
FFmpeg git head as we lack the manpower to
support other versions.
Hi guys,
I understand that the last official release of FFmpeg was 4.3.1 in
July last year. Given that FFmpeg has been released on an almost
monthly basis before that, I wonder whether there are any plans around
a version 4.4.0 or really any official version that would support
67 matches
Mail list logo
