On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 14.08.19 um 10:11 schrieb Moritz Barsnick:
A lot of waste of engineering energy, better invested into e.g. better
security or saving the planet, if you ask me. ;-)
Fine statement, I like it!
Maybe on the first glance. However, if the watermarkers
Am 14.08.19 um 10:11 schrieb Moritz Barsnick:
> A lot of waste of engineering energy, better invested into e.g. better
> security or saving the planet, if you ask me. ;-)
Fine statement, I like it!
-Ulf
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 15:59:39 +0200, Henning Thielemann wrote:
> > "Real" watermarking should be resistent to this, upto the point that
> > you need to "ruin" the video (or audio, for that matter) to get rid of
> > it.
>
> Off topic: I always wondered how "real watermarking" is able to survive
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 14:03:31 +0200, Ulf Zibis wrote:
I can imagine, that there is a chance to alienate the watermark by
rescaling the video or other filtering.
"Real" watermarking should be resistent to this, upto the point that
you need to
