ed rather old:
$ git clone https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/libvpx
$ cd libvpx
$ git checkout v1.5.0
libvpx$ git show -s --format=%ci 0134764
2015-10-08 14:05:25 -0700
When will ffmpeg use VP9 v1.5?
_______
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffm
Am 24.11.2015 um 13:02 schrieb D:
The new version is up* and I did a quick benchmark:
ffmpeg-git-20151120-64bit-static$ ./ffmpeg -i a.mp4 -c:v libvpx-vp9 -b:v
1M -cpu-used 4 -threads 4 -c:a libvorbis b.webm
fps= 13
ffmpeg-git-20151124-64bit-static$ ./ffmpeg -i a.mp4 -c:v libvpx-vp9 -b:v
1M
I played setting the values higher but it was neither faster nor slower.
Average 4 cores utilization is still ~80%.
Conclusion -- all in ffmpeg-git-20151124-64bit-static:
Almost 100% on all 4 cores if I use -- no problem there:
$ ./ffmpeg -i a.mp4 -c:v libx264 -crf 23 -c:a libvorbis b.mp4
Only
Hi D,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 14:31:58 +0100, D wrote:
> I played setting the values higher but it was neither faster nor slower.
> Average 4 cores utilization is still ~80%.
BTW, how do you define "utilization"? I believe in "top", 100% equals
one core's usage, so you should be able to achieve
On 2015-11-23 14:34, D wrote:
> Hi,
> I just downloaded the latest build (http://johnvansickle.com/ffmpeg/ ->
> "build: ffmpeg-git-64bit-static.tar.xz") and when encoding with VP9 (the
> new release has supposedly: "- Substantially improved VP9 encoding speed
> and quality"), it says:
>
> When
0x41f32e0] v1.4.0-1490-g0134764
...
I'm not sure but it looks like 0134764 (without the g at the beginning)
is indeed rather old:
$ git clone https://chromium.googlesource.com/webm/libvpx
$ cd libvpx
$ git checkout v1.5.0
libvpx$ git show -s --format=%ci 0134764
2015-10-08 14:05:25 -0700
When w
I'm not sure if it's "them". Following the download page
(johnvansickle.com), it looks like it's one person (John). Ok, I wrote him.
On 23.11.2015 14:48, James Darnley wrote:
On 2015-11-23 14:34, D wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded the latest build (http://johnvansickle.com/ffmpeg/ ->
"build:
[Off topic]
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:30 AM, D wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's "them". Following the download page
> (johnvansickle.com), it looks like it's one person (John). Ok, I wrote him.
"Them" (and "they") are a gender neutral singular pronouns, as well as
a plural
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 15:30:08 +0100, D wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's "them". Following the download page
> (johnvansickle.com), it looks like it's one person (John). Ok, I wrote him.
Perhaps his system isn't up to it yet. Fedora still packages 1.4.0.
1.5.0 is "only" 13 days old.
That said,
On 23.11.2015 16:24, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 15:30:08 +0100, D wrote:
I'm not sure if it's "them". Following the download page
(johnvansickle.com), it looks like it's one person (John). Ok, I wrote him.
Perhaps his system isn't up to it yet. Fedora still packages 1.4.0.
googlesource.com/webm/libvpx
$ cd libvpx
$ git checkout v1.5.0
libvpx$ git show -s --format=%ci 0134764
2015-10-08 14:05:25 -0700
When will ffmpeg use VP9 v1.5?
_______
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 16:50:18 +0100, D wrote:
> > Does ffmpeg build fine against 1.5.0? (For what it's worth: I might try
> > in a few moments.)
> You could try it, any info is helpful. v1.5 has some major improvements.
ffmpeg builds fine with it.
Moritz
On 23.11.2015 17:36, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 16:50:18 +0100, D wrote:
Does ffmpeg build fine against 1.5.0? (For what it's worth: I might try
in a few moments.)
You could try it, any info is helpful. v1.5 has some major improvements.
ffmpeg builds fine with it.
Thanks.
13 matches
Mail list logo