Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 21:42 Uhr schrieb Paul B Mahol :
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:59 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > There is no AVFrac in the (current) codebase.
> >
> Funny how he look at ultra old svn code dump, good luck with that,
>
> How he even managed to find links to svn stuff
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:59 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 01:47 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
> :
> >
> > The ffmpeg filter pipeline assigns a 'PTS' to each frame,
> > frame by frame.
>
> This may not be completely unreasonable but some
> comments are still necessary:
Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 01:47 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
:
>
> The ffmpeg filter pipeline assigns a 'PTS' to each frame,
> frame by frame.
This may not be completely unreasonable but some
comments are still necessary:
The sentence sounds to me as if the the filter pipeline always
assigns
On 2021-03-01 16:43, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
The ffmpeg filter pipeline assigns a 'PTS' to each frame, frame by
frame. Is *that* 'PTS' an int64_t?
I don't know how to answer this question. I don't know of a single piece
of code which is the "ffmpeg filter pipeline". I understand that
The ffmpeg filter pipeline assigns a 'PTS' to each frame, frame by frame. Is
*that* 'PTS' an int64_t?
Things I have found.
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#fps-1
"...trim any frames with a negative PTS."
That implies that PTS can be negative (ergo, is a signed integer).
