Greg Oliver (12023-10-20):
> I have never used ffprobe before, but I have seen countless messages
> on this left with regards to it not being closely maintained and
> recommendations to use other software to query media information.
It is the other way around.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
Am 20.10.23 um 23:37 schrieb Greg Oliver:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 3:57 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 7:19 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi,
in my last post "Codec 0x21000 is not in the full list."
you can see, that also the included metadata is mostly missing in the
output of ffprobe.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 11:38 PM Greg Oliver wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 3:57 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 20.10.23 um 20:14 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 7:19 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> in my last post "Codec 0x21000 is not in the full
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 3:57 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.10.23 um 20:14 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 7:19 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> in my last post "Codec 0x21000 is not in the full list."
> >> you can see, that also the included metadata is mostly
Am 20.10.23 um 20:14 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 7:19 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi,
in my last post "Codec 0x21000 is not in the full list."
you can see, that also the included metadata is mostly missing in the
output of ffprobe. Why?
When I use the same command and the same
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 7:19 PM Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in my last post "Codec 0x21000 is not in the full list."
> you can see, that also the included metadata is mostly missing in the
> output of ffprobe. Why?
>
> When I use the same command and the same metadata file for mkv output,
>
Hi,
in my last post "Codec 0x21000 is not in the full list."
you can see, that also the included metadata is mostly missing in the output of
ffprobe. Why?
When I use the same command and the same metadata file for mkv output, beside
this message all is fine:
$ ffmpeg -i König_de.meta -t
