2018-11-19 18:41 GMT+01:00, Kieran O Leary :
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, 17:36 Carl Eugen Hoyos
>> 2018-11-19 18:34 GMT+01:00, Reto Kromer :
>> > Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> >
>> >>I wonder if metadata is really sufficient to decode an mxf
>> >>file...
>> >
>> > In my personal opinion, no.
>>
>> My
Becoz nike
Hugo
De : Paul B Mahol
Envoyé le :lundi 19 novembre 2018 18:55
À : FFmpeg user questions
Objet :Re: [FFmpeg-user] uncompressed RGB within MXF
On 11/19/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2018-11-19 18:42 GMT+01:00, Reto Kromer :
>> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>>>
On 11/19/18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> 2018-11-19 18:42 GMT+01:00, Reto Kromer :
>> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>>>My question was:
>>>Does the player that already supports this abomination depend
>>>on the metadata? I would prefer to rule this out before spending
>>>more time with this 4G file.
On 11/19/18, yUGz afterLife wrote:
> Dont know wut iz mxf but already had some well taged mp3 on aimp that
> ffprobe doesnt read (on a normal mp3)
> Maybe be private data id3 or no id WTF …
>
Please, share file.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, 17:36 Carl Eugen Hoyos 2018-11-19 18:34 GMT+01:00, Reto Kromer :
> > Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >
> >>I wonder if metadata is really sufficient to decode an mxf
> >>file...
> >
> > In my personal opinion, no.
>
> My question was:
> Does the player that already supports this
Dont know wut iz mxf but already had some well taged mp3 on aimp that ffprobe
doesnt read (on a normal mp3)
Maybe be private data id3 or no id WTF …
Hugo
De : Carl Eugen Hoyos
Envoyé le :lundi 19 novembre 2018 18:36
À : FFmpeg user questions
Objet :Re: [FFmpeg-user] uncompressed RGB within MXF
2018-11-19 18:42 GMT+01:00, Reto Kromer :
> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>>My question was:
>>Does the player that already supports this abomination depend
>>on the metadata? I would prefer to rule this out before spending
>>more time with this 4G file.
>
> It's actually what I'm trying to figure
2018-11-19 18:34 GMT+01:00, Reto Kromer :
> Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
>>I wonder if metadata is really sufficient to decode an mxf
>>file...
>
> In my personal opinion, no.
My question was:
Does the player that already supports this abomination depend
on the metadata? I would prefer to rule this
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>I wonder if metadata is really sufficient to decode an mxf
>file...
In my personal opinion, no. Best regards, Reto
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To
2018-11-19 16:25 GMT+01:00, Kieran O'Leary :
> Here is a sample -
> https://wetransfer.com/downloads/99e7bddc04e6faee2e001ad2ebed4a3c20181119152241/ce77f8
Can you use a binary editor and damage the metadata of the
file around hex position 0x1050 that currently says "R.G.B."
to check if the file
2018-11-19 16:25 GMT+01:00, Kieran O'Leary :
> Here is a sample -
> https://wetransfer.com/downloads/99e7bddc04e6faee2e001ad2ebed4a3c20181119152241/ce77f8
To decode this file:
$ ffmpeg -vcodec avrp -i file
$ ffplay -vcodec avrp file
I was unable to find a useful uid != 0 in this file,
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, 08:32 Paul B Mahol, wrote:
> On 10/24/18, Kieran O Leary wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see that uncompressed RGB is not supported within MXF. I know that
> > Resolve can create 10-bit RGB but only at HD resolution. I didn't see
> > anything relating to uncompressed RGB
On 10/24/18, Kieran O Leary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that uncompressed RGB is not supported within MXF. I know that
> Resolve can create 10-bit RGB but only at HD resolution. I didn't see
> anything relating to uncompressed RGB in the UL list in mxfenc.c and I
> don't have an SMPTE account to get
Hi,
I see that uncompressed RGB is not supported within MXF. I know that
Resolve can create 10-bit RGB but only at HD resolution. I didn't see
anything relating to uncompressed RGB in the UL list in mxfenc.c and I
don't have an SMPTE account to get beyond the Paywall that would let
me know what
14 matches
Mail list logo
