On 4/20/17, Markku Tavasti wrote:
> On 19.04.2017 23:28, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 4/19/17, Markku Tavasti wrote:
>>> From http://scl1.tavasti.fi/~tavasti/ you can find 3 video clips for
>>> testing. Create video from them like:
>>>
>>> ffmpeg -f concat
On 19.04.2017 23:28, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/19/17, Markku Tavasti wrote:
From http://scl1.tavasti.fi/~tavasti/ you can find 3 video clips for
testing. Create video from them like:
ffmpeg -f concat -safe 0 -i <(for i in FHD*MOV; do echo file $(pwd)/$i;
done) -an
On 4/19/17, Markku Tavasti wrote:
> On 19.04.2017 07:04, Markku Tavasti wrote:
>> On 18.04.2017 23:02, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> Alternatively you could provide me link to original fotage.
>>
>> I'll select relevant parts and put them to somewhere at the evening. The
>> whole
On 19.04.2017 07:04, Markku Tavasti wrote:
On 18.04.2017 23:02, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Alternatively you could provide me link to original fotage.
I'll select relevant parts and put them to somewhere at the evening. The
whole original set is 15G (video was speeded 300x).
On 18.04.2017 23:02, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Alternatively you could provide me link to original fotage.
I'll select relevant parts and put them to somewhere at the evening. The
whole original set is 15G (video was speeded 300x).
___
ffmpeg-user
On 4/18/17, Markku Tavasti wrote:
> On 18.04.2017 22:35, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 4/18/17, Markku Tavasti wrote:
>>> On 18.04.2017 20:06, Paul B Mahol wrote:
I just wrote deflicker filter.
>>>
>>> Sounds great! Do you want some tester for it?
>>
>>
On 18.04.2017 22:35, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/18/17, Markku Tavasti wrote:
On 18.04.2017 20:06, Paul B Mahol wrote:
I just wrote deflicker filter.
Sounds great! Do you want some tester for it?
Yes, Do you know how to apply patches and build master ffmpeg git?
Haven't
On 4/18/17, Markku Tavasti wrote:
> On 18.04.2017 20:06, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure that ffmpeg can't do that, as I know of no filter which
>>> will create such an average and apply it. But a filter could be
>>> written... I don't know if it would be a candidate
On 18.04.2017 20:06, Paul B Mahol wrote:
I'm pretty sure that ffmpeg can't do that, as I know of no filter which
will create such an average and apply it. But a filter could be
written... I don't know if it would be a candidate for upstream though.
I just wrote deflicker filter.
Sounds
On 18.04.2017 14:02, Markku Tavasti wrote:
Maybe I try to create script which would get frames as pictures. And in
addition, to darkest parts of the video, there is huge noise in picture,
averaging maybe 4 frames migth give better results.
Made a script:
On 4/18/17, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:45:24 +0300, Markku Tavasti wrote:
>> One option is to write all frames as pictures to disk, and then run
>> timelapse-deflicker.pl for them, and make video from those pictures.
>> However, that will take much time
On 18.04.2017 12:31, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:45:24 +0300, Markku Tavasti wrote:
One option is to write all frames as pictures to disk, and then run
timelapse-deflicker.pl for them, and make video from those pictures.
However, that will take much time and disk space.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:45:24 +0300, Markku Tavasti wrote:
> One option is to write all frames as pictures to disk, and then run
> timelapse-deflicker.pl for them, and make video from those pictures.
> However, that will take much time and disk space.
Only after looking at that script[*]
On 16.04.2017 15:08, Markku Tavasti wrote:
towards camera, and endig to darkness. So exposure changes gradually,
but problem is that on such cameras, change is annoying clear, sudden
change. Therefore, I'd like to smoothen that so that it is not that sudden.
See example what I mean
14 matches
Mail list logo