Hey,
I am trying to upgrade from ffmpeg v5 to v6, I have noticed one video that
has big increase in format duration time
This is the command I use:
ffprobe -v error -print_format json -show_format -show_streams
too-many-packets.mp4
Link to video and outputs:
On 11/02/2024 13.09, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote:
So do you, so why ask the question?
Now go away!
I do not know the answer.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 7:12 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
> On 11/02/2024 13.09, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote:
> > So do you, so why ask the question?
> > Now go away!
>
> I do not know the answer.
>
In most cases you will get in most times different results for those 2
variants.
Only for perfect
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 8:50 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
> On 11/02/2024 14.28, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 7:12 PM Mark Filipak >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/02/2024 13.09, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote:
> >>> So do you, so why ask the question?
> >>> Now go away!
> >>
> >> I do not
I think I can help out here, Vincent.
On 11/02/2024 14.53, Vincent Deconinck wrote:
Hi,
I will probably get flamed because I'm for jumping into this conversation
while being a complete newbie :-), but I think nobody replied with an
answer to Mark's question "why".
Before "why" there's the
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 8:54 PM Vincent Deconinck
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will probably get flamed because I'm for jumping into this conversation
> while being a complete newbie :-), but I think nobody replied with an
> answer to Mark's question "why".
>
> All I know is the ffmpeg page on seeking -
>
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 10:01 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
> -- Forgive me if this is a duplicate (trouble with email client, again) --
>
> I think I can help out here, Vincent.
>
> On 11/02/2024 14.53, Vincent Deconinck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will probably get flamed because I'm for jumping into
On 11/02/2024 13.00, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote:
Stop trolling.
Read in on the subject. You want to write a FFmpeg manual?
Go away, don’t spam the rest of us.
On 11 Feb 2024, at 18:47, Mark Filipak wrote:
Command 1:
ffmpeg -ss 10 -copyts -i this.m2ts -map 0 -c copy -sn -dn -muxdelay 0
Hi,
I will probably get flamed because I'm for jumping into this conversation
while being a complete newbie :-), but I think nobody replied with an
answer to Mark's question "why".
All I know is the ffmpeg page on seeking -
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Seeking - ends with a paragraph saying:
On 11/02/2024 16.42, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Codec copy with -ss before -i and after -i is not documented that it gives
different results
Does that make sense? I think it's not documented because no one knows how to
explain the results.
because once you do not decode everything from start you
Stop trolling.
Read in on the subject. You want to write a FFmpeg manual?
Go away, don’t spam the rest of us.
> On 11 Feb 2024, at 18:47, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> Command 1:
> ffmpeg -ss 10 -copyts -i this.m2ts -map 0 -c copy -sn -dn -muxdelay 0
> that.m2ts
> Command 2:
> ffmpeg -copyts -i
So do you, so why ask the question?
Now go away!
> On 11 Feb 2024, at 19:05, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2024 13.00, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote:
>> Stop trolling.
>> Read in on the subject. You want to write a FFmpeg manual?
>> Go away, don’t spam the rest of us.
>>> On 11 Feb 2024, at
On 11/02/2024 14.28, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 7:12 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 11/02/2024 13.09, Bouke / Videotoolshed wrote:
So do you, so why ask the question?
Now go away!
I do not know the answer.
In most cases you will get in most times different results for those
-- Forgive me if this is a duplicate (trouble with email client, again) --
I think I can help out here, Vincent.
On 11/02/2024 14.53, Vincent Deconinck wrote:
Hi,
I will probably get flamed because I'm for jumping into this conversation
while being a complete newbie :-), but I think nobody
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 11:08 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
> On 11/02/2024 16.42, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > Codec copy with -ss before -i and after -i is not documented that it
> gives
> > different results
>
> Does that make sense? I think it's not documented because no one knows how
> to explain the
*Output for 6.1.1:*
{
"streams": [
{
"index": 0,
"codec_name": "mp3",
"codec_long_name": "MP3 (MPEG audio layer 3)",
"codec_type": "audio",
"codec_tag_string": "mp4a",
"codec_tag": "0x6134706d",
Hello,
Please read the mailing list FAQ at
https://ffmpeg.org/mailing-list-faq.html, it tells users to post the
complete and unedited command and output and not to top-post.
Also, it's a lot easier for us humans to read the default output than JSON
and there's important info like the build
On 2/11/2024 2:14 AM, Avraham Sikirov via ffmpeg-user wrote:
Link to video and outputs:
Please put the command outputs in the email message, not as an attachment or
gdrive, it's much easier for everyone to see and read.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user
Hello Carl,
Thanks for your response.
This is the complete and unedited output from that exact command.
There are 3 parts in the output of ffprobe to a video file.
1. Audio stream.
2. Video stream
3. Format (which represents the container).
Every one of them has duration and bitrate.
In this
Command 1:
ffmpeg -ss 10 -copyts -i this.m2ts -map 0 -c copy -sn -dn -muxdelay 0 that.m2ts
Command 2:
ffmpeg -copyts -i this.m2ts -map 0 -ss 10 -c copy -sn -dn -muxdelay 0 that.m2ts
Let's ignore all the errors both make. And let's ignore the individual errors that they make
individually.
Paul:
On 2024-02-11 13:42, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Codec copy with -ss before -i and after -i is not documented that it gives
different results because
once you do not decode everything from start you basically can notexpect to get
always (for any
container and for any input) frame-accurate
On 11/02/2024 17.39, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 11:08 PM Mark Filipak
wrote:
On 11/02/2024 16.42, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Codec copy with -ss before -i and after -i is not documented that it gives
different results
Does that make sense? I think it's not documented because no
22 matches
Mail list logo
