Thank You so much, Moritz...
I am very near to where i wanted to be...
Regards,
Hardik Kanakia
+91 93204 89772
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Moritz Barsnick barsn...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 22:04:15 +0530, Hardik Kanakia wrote:
Hello All,
I want to export 5.1 channel
On 29/04/15 22:22, Christoph Gerstbauer wrote:
I found out that a IMX50 mxf file encoded with FFmbc and the IMX50 mxf
file encoded with actual ffmpeg builds are different in these mxf
metadata flags (by reading out via ffprobe - show_streams)
FFMBC IMX FILE stream 0:0:
color_range=tv
Hi Kai,
Before I make a bug report, am I missing something?
Yes. You have too many links to external stuff (tarballs, logs [why not
attached here?], various scenarios, various requests, and it's unclear
what the problem is.
Your only problem report:
CPU iPhone OS 8_3 like Mac OS X)
On 28/04/15 18:02, Mohammadtorabi wrote:
Hi,I have created an iFrame only MXF file by the command below using
[...snipped densely packed forest of words]
Was there a question in there somewhere? I couldn't see the wood for the
trees due to the lack of formating.
--
Tim.
Key Fingerprint 38CF
On 30/04/15 07:20, Christoph Gerstbauer wrote:
Hello
I am making tests with IMX50/MXF encodings with FFMBC and FFMPEG. (with
24bit audio and 16bit audio)
[...]
Reeatedly asking the same question in a new thread, without waiting a
resonable time for a reply, is begining to get tedious and
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Kai Hendry hen...@webconverger.com wrote:
On 30 April 2015 at 15:38, Moritz Barsnick barsn...@gmx.net wrote:
Yes. You have too many links to external stuff (tarballs, logs [why not
attached here?], various scenarios, various requests, and it's unclear
what the
, no externally linked files that might go away
Wow, so you've not seen a -report like this?
http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/ffmpeg-20150430-102645.log
You may have overseen one important message in your logs:
No pixel format specified, yuv422p for H.264 encoding chosen.
Use -pix_fmt yuv420p
Hello Tim,
I thought it would be better to split up my questions to 2 different
tickets, just to prevent mixing up different issues.
If you are able to delete the first mail, please do it.
Best Regards
Christoph Gerstbauer
Am 30.04.2015 um 09:16 schrieb tim nicholson:
On 30/04/15 07:20,
that invocation of ffmpeg produced, presented as inline in the
email. No attachments, no externally linked files that might go away
Wow, so you've not seen a -report like this?
http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/ffmpeg-20150430-102645.log
I'm not opening random links, so no. See this page for what
Thanks Moritz,
Would I enter this right into my command prompt, or would I create a separate
file to run this statement from? I keep getting an error saying File
unexpected at this time. Apologies for any ignorance. I am new to using the
command window, though I do have coding experience in
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Werner Robitza
werner.robi...@gmail.com wrote:
There are many ways to get Bash on Windows.
I should add that you can also transform this into a Windows Batch
file, or a Java program that does the looping and executes ffmpeg.
What's important is that ffmpeg on its
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Chris Zecco cze...@mreach.com wrote:
Thanks Moritz,
Would I enter this right into my command prompt, or would I create a separate
file to run this statement from? I keep getting an error saying File
unexpected at this time. Apologies for any ignorance. I am
On 4/30/2015 8:22 AM, Chris Zecco wrote:
Thanks Moritz,
Would I enter this right into my command prompt, or would I create a separate file to run
this statement from? I keep getting an error saying File unexpected at this
time. Apologies for any ignorance. I am new to using the command
is the report log:
http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/ffmpeg-20150430-102645.log
http://ix.io/icO is what I saw
Here is the tarball of the output
http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/output.tar.gz
Which of the three is what? Am I supposed to look at them all? And yes,
attaching 850739 and 4252 bytes
[Your responses are backwards. That makes reading ... awkward.]
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:33:34 -0400, Shlomo Morosow wrote:
https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html#Expression-Evaluation
Where does it say that epressions are expressed as such?
%{expr\\\: (10-1)}
I regularly use this in
The first link was supposed to be this one
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#Text-expansion
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Shlomo Morosow smoro...@jemedia.org
wrote:
Sorry email was sent before complete:
https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html#Expression-Evaluation
I regularly use
Sorry email was sent before complete:
https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-utils.html#Expression-Evaluation
I regularly use this in many filters and it works just as expected, it's
just that I ran into an issue with the fade filter.
Thanks,
Shlomo
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Shlomo Morosow
Hello guys,
We are running a transcoding server on top of FFmpeg, where in principle
the machine can get quite
busy in more than 1 concurrent job is submitted.
Is it possible that a machine under heavy load might affect the goodness of
FFmpeg transcoding output?
In other terms, is a video
Am 30.04.2015 um 12:52 schrieb Alfredo Di Napoli:
Hello guys,
We are running a transcoding server on top of FFmpeg, where in principle
the machine can get quite
busy in more than 1 concurrent job is submitted.
Is it possible that a machine under heavy load might affect the goodness of
FFmpeg
Le primidi 11 floréal, an CCXXIII, Alfredo Di Napoli a écrit :
We have given ffmpeg max priority with “nice -20”, if that matters.
Note that nice -20 is short for nice -n 20, that means more than the max
niceness, or in other words the min priority.
(That is, assuming the process starts at nice
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Christoph Gerstbauer wrote:
I found out that a IMX50 mxf file encoded with FFmbc and the IMX50 mxf file
encoded with actual ffmpeg builds are different in these mxf metadata flags
(by reading out via ffprobe - show_streams)
FFMBC IMX FILE stream 0:0:
color_range=tv
Am 30.04.15 um 00:08 schrieb kevin:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:08 PM, kevin kevincastigli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:12 AM, kevin kevincastigli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Matthieu Bouron
matthieu.bou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:06:03 +0800
Kai Hendry hen...@webconverger.com wrote:
Wow, so you've not seen a -report like this?
http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-30/ffmpeg-20150430-102645.log
The -report option creates an output using the verbose loglevel
resulting in such a large output. It is often
Hello All,
I am trying to concat ProRes clips (no audio) into one file. Here is
my command:
ffmpeg -i
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015, at 03:01 PM, loeff...@eyetrap.net wrote:
I am trying to concat ProRes clips (no audio) into one file.
You will probably have better luck with the concat demuxer.
https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-formats.html#concat-1
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Concatenate
ffmpeg version 1.1.4
Thanks for the help. It's making a bit of sense now. It looks like my
keyframes are 1/3 of a second. Is less than 2 seconds apart ok?
In the pict_type field I'm seeing B's and P's with one I. Does that
translate to how far apart they are?
[FRAME]
pkt_pts_time=244.70
I forgot to mention, that over Ethernet there is still a ~2 sec delay?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Adrian Schwartz schwart...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Roger
When I changed the network interface from wireless to Ethernet, I stopped
seeing the past duration to large error.
I do see
27 matches
Mail list logo
