Kevin Wells hotmail.co.uk> writes:
> but is there any sort of patch available
Not that I know of.
> or could I just remove those added lines from
> avfiltergraph.c and build?
You could, or you could follow my advice / workaround
from my first email (using -i several times as
replacement for
Subscriptions znet.ca znet.ca> writes:
> The error given is that there is no key frame other than PPS0, what
> makes no sense as the stream will be useless without keyframes
This may not be related to your issue but please note
that valid (and playable) H264 streams without keyframes
exist.
> To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
> From: ceho...@ag.or.at
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:29:29 +
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Unknown channel layouts not supported
>
> Kevin Wells hotmail.co.uk> writes:
>
> > I am using filter complex to split and pan audio channels,
> > but on a 10 channel file I
Hello everyone,
I am experimenting unusual behaviour while transcoding live video via
libnvenc, and would like to ask if someone else had this problem or some
suggestion on what I am not doing right.
The situation: I want to transcode a live mpeg2 stream of ~16Mb/s to
h264, and got an nvidia
Kevin Wells hotmail.co.uk> writes:
> I am using filter complex to split and pan audio channels,
> but on a 10 channel file I am getting the error
Thank you for the report, I created ticket #5218.
Workaround should be to specify the input more than once:
$ ffmpeg -i input1 -i input1 -i input1 ..
On 2/4/16, Michael Koch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to make a deep zoom-in from several images. For example, begin
> with image1 (which was taken with a 50mm objective) and use the zoompan
> filter to make a 5 seconds zoom-in from 1x to 4x, then use image2 (taken
> with a 200mm objective) and co
Hmm, what a stir about simple question..
If I only knew... I wouldn't stat this thread. Any way to close it or
delete it? Seems like pretty painful topic.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Hi Bohdan,
I am new to ffmpeg so I might be wrong, but creating
"c:/usr/local/lib/frei0r-1" folder and adding the cartoon.dll to it and
running your command worked just fine for me.
I also suppose you're running windows... :)
On 04/02/2016 15:06, Bohdan Prokopovych wrote:
Hi.
I'm using FFm
ave attached the log file as well as
displaying it here:ffmpeg started on 2016-02-04 at 21:01:22
Report written to "ffmpeg-20160204-210122.log"
Command line:
"G:\\ffmpeg\\ffmpeg-20160204-git-37db3e8-win64-static\\bin\\ffmpeg.exe" -i
"VBOXSVR\\Movies\\Movie10.mov"
gdigrab has a "window" option FWIW
On 2/2/16, JuliaM wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm using ffmpeg + screen-capture-recorder to record my own and student
> work.
>
> For my situation, I use a Remote desktop to follow their work (to resume I
> open/use an Admin session on the student computer while he's workin
Am 04.02.2016 um 22:11 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
and I'm the rude when your are insulting
what do you expect for ignorace and waste time by continue pretending
proven wrong *b...t* instead learn to deal with your mail client?
2016-02-04 22:06 GMT+01:00 Jannes Faber :
On 4 Feb 2016 9:56
and I'm the rude when your are insulting
2016-02-04 22:06 GMT+01:00 Jannes Faber :
> On 4 Feb 2016 9:56 p.m., "juan carlos Rebate" wrote:
>>
>> gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom
>
> Click the fking three little dots!
> ___
> ffmp
On 4 Feb 2016 9:56 p.m., "juan carlos Rebate" wrote:
>
> gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom
Click the fking three little dots!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:56 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom
and NO you should not reply at the bottom
* repy INLINE
* quote correctly
* strip un-needed quotes
* learn to use email
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:56 PM, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
> gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom,
Mine does. Click the little rectangle with three dots on it. Then you
can reply "inline", like I am doing right now.
-m
___
ffmpeg-us
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:56 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom
READ THIS WHOLE FUCKING THREAD AND STOP PRETEND THAT!
you are even too lazy/stupid to remove the list footer from your reply
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:37 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
I am
gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom, outlook if
you have this option, but this application is payment, evolution does
not have that option, thunderbird does not have this option, if you
have kmail but does not allow referencing the ancient text
2016-02-04 21:40 GMT+01:00 Rein
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:37 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
I am not rude, gmail-web does not allow me to publish on the bottom
and not use programs that do not like, no one can force me to use
something I'm not comfortable
proven in *this thread* you can properly write mail with gmail and if
you are
I am not rude, gmail-web does not allow me to publish on the bottom
and not use programs that do not like, no one can force me to use
something I'm not comfortable
2016-02-04 20:55 GMT+01:00 Paul B Mahol :
> On 2/4/16, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
>> if you think it's a waste of time does not respon
> Which frame rate works fine with nvenc_h264?
The original frame rate which is 23.976. setting in to -r 24 seems to work too,
but with other framerates (20, 25, 30), I'm seeing stuttering issues.
> > - HEVC levels 4.1 to 5.0
> - Did you also try lower levels?
I have not tried lower than 4.1 w
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 17:06:52 +0200, Bohdan Prokopovych wrote:
[I'm having problems with your console output, because I don't see line
breaks on my receiving end, and either my mailer or my editor is
truncating nearly endless line in the response.]
I have no idea abot frei0r, but:
> [Parsed_fr
On 2/4/16, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
> if you think it's a waste of time does not respond, the sociedd
> progresses, the services must engage the advance, the service is so
> and we must tolerate, no one should tell anyone how they should do
> things.
You are being rude, because you are top posti
Pierre-Yves Hocquellet gmail.com> writes:
> The same sample encoded with nvenc_h264 plays smoothly,
> no problem. although I've noticed that if I attempt to
> change the frame rate - r from the original, I get some
> of the same issues.
Which frame rate works fine with nvenc_h264?
> - HEVC
if you think it's a waste of time does not respond, the sociedd
progresses, the services must engage the advance, the service is so
and we must tolerate, no one should tell anyone how they should do
things.
2016-02-04 19:31 GMT+01:00 Jannes Faber :
> On 4 February 2016 at 17:42, juan carlos Rebate
Hi,
I've compiled ffmpeg with nvenc (with sdk 6.0.1) and encoded a sample movie
with nvenc_hevc in .TS container (my TV only supports hevc in a TS
container...). Plays fine on VLC / PC, but very poorly on that LG TV- the
picture is messed up with macroblock issues all over the place and stutte
Hi.
I'm using FFmpeg with frei0r library enabled, and everything works just
fine except several effects.
I can't make Cartoon and Edgeglow effects to work. Lot of other works ok,
except these two. I hit this issue only on Windows, everything is ok on OS
X.
There is some problem in my cartoon.dll
Hi all
The following command is used to capture video from RTSP to HLS but often
prompt "max delay reached. need to consume packet" and there is no in .ts is
generated
ffmpeg -i
"rtsp://admin:admin@192.168.1.150:554/cam/realmonitor?channel=8&subtype=1"
-map 0 -flags +global_header -c:v copy -an -
On 4 February 2016 at 17:42, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
> I agree
To what? Why are you trying to waste my time? Why are you trying to force
me to search through the context, by top posting?
I'm not going to. So I don't care what you're agreeing to. Which is not my
problem.
Also, I'm muting thi
I agree, I'm used to answer as well, plus it's easier to read
responses, this innconveniente ignore me on the list, besides the html
is the evolution, why so afraid?
2016-02-04 11:27 GMT+01:00 Nicolas George :
> Le sextidi 16 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Roman a écrit :
>> I've seen many times people aski
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Roman wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ? Most of programs, including gmail app
> and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way all
> people are use
Phil Turmel, Jason C
Hi guys and thanks for your time, but it now seems like we see
disadvantages of quoted answers or laziness of yours to read the whole 28
mails and see the fact, that I was not tried to say something really bad to
this type of style. Thanks to Reindl Harald's patience which was
Honestly it is a non-issue.
I thought I was signing up for a technical discussion and support list, not a
posting etiquette discussion list. Apparently ffmpeg has no such thing.
On February 4, 2016 10:50:43 AM EST, Jason C wrote:
>On Feb 4, 2016 4:46 AM, "Roman" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I'v
Am 04.02.2016 um 16:54 schrieb Charles Winthrop:
Honestly it is a non-issue.
I thought I was signing up for a technical discussion and support list, not a
posting etiquette discussion list. Apparently ffmpeg has no such thing.
looks like you are no capable to ignore a thread which don't inte
On Feb 4, 2016 4:46 AM, "Roman" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ? Most of programs, including gmail app
> and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way all
> people are used to r
Hi Roman,
On 02/04/2016 04:46 AM, Roman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ?
Long-time lurker here, infrequent poster, so take this as an outsider's
view:
People who *ask* questions on mailing lists l
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 14:36:29 +, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> The encoding quality of FFmpeg's native AAC encoder
> has improved significantly but I don't think it has
> reached the quality of libfdk (yet).
Ah yes, my bad (memory). Thanks for clearing this up. Indeed, the most
recent non-aut
Moritz Barsnick gmx.net> writes:
> And what that page apparently doesn't say yet is that
> - on git master - ffmpeg's native AAC encoder has
> surpassed libfdk_aac's quality.
The encoding quality of FFmpeg's native AAC encoder
has improved significantly but I don't think it has
reached the q
Am 04.02.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
top-posting is considered rude on this list
By who?
why do you strip quotes out of context and play the unknown while you
are long enough trolling on this list:
https://www.google.com/search?q=top-posting+here+is+considered+as+rude
signature.
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 18:54:56 -0700, Jim Worrall wrote:
> According to https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/AAC, you’re better
> off with libfdk_aac anyway.
And what that page apparently doesn't say yet is that - on git master -
ffmpeg's native AAC encoder has surpassed libfdk_aac's quality. It
On 2/3/2016 8:54 PM, Jim Worrall wrote:
On 2016 Feb 2, at 12:22 PM, Чжо Зо Лвин wrote:
I am a ffmpeg beginner on mac. I can't install on my computer. I attach a photo
with e-mail. My error is libfaac not found. How can I solve this error.
According to https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/AAC,
> top-posting is considered rude on this list
By who?
And at this point, the idea of your accusing anyone else of impoliteness is
hilarious.
P
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Am 04.02.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
no, you are a fool telling others "Ignore complaints about it.
Please stop insulting me. I haven't insulted you. Your presumptiveness is
breathtaking
when you recommend ignoring the list-rules your are either a fool or a troll
"background no
Am 04.02.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Charles Winthrop:
Well, this has decided me. Dump ffmpeg and find an actual solution.
have fun, here ffmpeg works for nearly a decade fine
Everyone her would rather whine about writing style than actually solve
a problem. Really professsional, folks!
WTF - c
I work with open source software daily. And I have NEVER seen more
in-fighting going on with a single piece of it until ffmpeg. Not just
this list. I've tried forums, live chats, and even stackexchange. Nobody
dealing with ffmpeg, these so-called "experts" ever answer any
questions, they just b
> Everyone her would rather whine about writing style than actually solve > a
>problem. Really professsional, folks!
Welcome to open source software...
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
> no, you are a fool telling others "Ignore complaints about it.
Please stop insulting me. I haven't insulted you. Your presumptiveness is
breathtaking.
> "background noise" comes from the list-owners / developers
That's funny, when I've asked in the past, I have been told that nobody is in
char
Well, this has decided me. Dump ffmpeg and find an actual solution.
Everyone her would rather whine about writing style than actually solve
a problem. Really professsional, folks!
On 2/4/2016 8:09 AM, Phil Rhodes wrote:
I think the fact that this is by far the most hotly-debated topic in a lo
Am 04.02.2016 um 14:35 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
who do you think you are?
I think I'm the guy who isn't using bad language
no, you are a fool telling others "Ignore complaints about it. They're
background noise" while that so called "background noise" comes from the
list-owners / developers
> who do you think you are?
I think I'm the guy who isn't using bad language.
P
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
I think the fact that this is by far the most hotly-debated topic in a long
time speaks volumes.
P
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
2016-02-04 14:49 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 04.02.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Roman:
>
>> that below is the perfect example how shitty your mailing style is
>>> nobody is any longer able to guess who said what in what context
>>>
>>> I understand your frustration, but please, try to stay calm. I
Am 04.02.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Roman:
that below is the perfect example how shitty your mailing style is
nobody is any longer able to guess who said what in what context
I understand your frustration, but please, try to stay calm. I'm not a PC
beginner, I've got really about 12 years of techn
> that below is the perfect example how shitty your mailing style is
> nobody is any longer able to guess who said what in what context
>
> I understand your frustration, but please, try to stay calm. I'm not a PC
beginner, I've got really about 12 years of technical experience in *nix
and networki
that below is the perfect example how shitty your mailing style is
nobody is any longer able to guess who said what in what context
Am 04.02.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Roman:
No. I expect you to use the "features" of the "client" you use.
Clicking on the ellipsis in the box (those three dots in a gr
Most of the time, it doesn't cause serious problems with readability and
may encourage people to contribute usefully if they're posting on, say, a
cellphone, or in a hurry.
It's an "open source thing". The only place you commonly find people
complaining about it is on lists just like this one, dedi
No. I expect you to use the "features" of the "client" you use.
Clicking on the ellipsis in the box (those three dots in a grey
rectangle) with the tooltip "Show trimmed content" you will suddenly see
everything you are quoting. You can then cut it up from there.
Here is what is happened, when
Am 04.02.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
Most of the time, it doesn't cause serious problems with readability and may
encourage people to contribute usefully if they're posting on, say, a
cellphone, or in a hurry.
It's an "open source thing". The only place you commonly find people
complai
On 2016-02-04 12:44, Roman wrote:
>> OMFG! Let me log into the web interface and show you how it is done.
>
> So you just offer me to insert ">" symbol before every line I quote or just
> copy the whole e-mail I'm answering to?
No. I expect you to use the "features" of the "client" you use.
In
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Roman wrote:
>
> > OMFG! Let me log into the web interface and show you how it is done.
>
> So you just offer me to insert ">" symbol before every line I quote or
just
> copy the whole e-mail I'm answering to?
This was also done from gmail's website. Click on the
Most of the time, it doesn't cause serious problems with readability and may
encourage people to contribute usefully if they're posting on, say, a
cellphone, or in a hurry.
It's an "open source thing". The only place you commonly find people
complaining about it is on lists just like this one,
> OMFG! Let me log into the web interface and show you how it is done.
So you just offer me to insert ">" symbol before every line I quote or just
copy the whole e-mail I'm answering to?
2016-02-04 13:40 GMT+02:00 James Darnley :
> On 2016-02-04 12:30, Roman wrote:
> > why should *we* suck
On 2016-02-04 12:30, Roman wrote:
> why should *we* suck your quoting style?
>
> you should not. just don't reply, if you don't like the style. To try
> to convince every one to change their habits due to minority being upset. I
> think, such approach will make everyone happy.
>
> why should some
why should *we* suck your quoting style?
you should not. just don't reply, if you don't like the style. To try
to convince every one to change their habits due to minority being upset. I
think, such approach will make everyone happy.
why should someone use gmail-webinterface when gmail also works
Am 04.02.2016 um 12:12 schrieb Roman:
Damn, you guys just made my eyes bleeding again
then look somewhere else?
I use gmail, so when I copy the visualized quote, It ends up with:
does your mail client not visualize quotes?
get a better one - see attachment
Seems like doesn't. Or it actuall
Damn, you guys just made my eyes bleeding again.
I use gmail, so when I copy the visualized quote, It ends up with:
does your mail client not visualize quotes?
get a better one - see attachment
Seems like doesn't. Or it actually does, when I will send it? Let's see..
Why should I keep to some cl
Am 04.02.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Roman:
When you read reviews (academical, amateur, professional), there are no
quotes and below-postings. Review author just mentions what exactly hes
referring to and continues his review. And same goes to review on review.
Please see academical reviews as an exa
Am 04.02.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Roman:
Thanks for an answer.
I see, but still not share such approach while sending/receiving e-mails.
It was not very comfortable for me to follow your e-mail with such quotes
does your mail client not visualize quotes?
get a better one - see attachment
s
Am 04.02.2016 um 10:46 schrieb Roman:
I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
yes
So here I've got a question.. Why ?
because it's better readable
Most of programs, including gmail app
and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way a
Hi,
Thanks for an answer.
I see, but still not share such approach while sending/receiving e-mails.
It was not very comfortable for me to follow your e-mail with such quotes
etc. I'd prefer to read it just as one whole e-mail separated with empty
new lines for every of my question with reference
On 2016-02-04 10:46, Roman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ? Most of programs, including gmail app
> and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way all
> people are used to read ma
Roman wrote:
Hi,
I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the
list... So here I've got a question.. Why ?
It's a mailing list, not just a conversation between two people.
When you ask multiple questions different people may answer different
parts, which may spawn sub thr
Le sextidi 16 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Roman a écrit :
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ?
I will answer to you with a question: when you watch an episode of a TV
series, does it:
A. start with short excerpts of the previou
Kachhawal, Vijay P,
did you try those static ffmpeg builds?
http://johnvansickle.com/ffmpeg/
2016-02-04 11:10 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>
> Am 04.02.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Kachhawal, Vijay P:
>
>> Hello Roman/Mr. Reindl Harald,
>>
>> Thank you for all the help you both provided.
>>
>> I am litt
Hi,
I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
So here I've got a question.. Why ? Most of programs, including gmail app
and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way all
people are used to read mail. Why the hell one should scroll down to see
t
Hi all,
I'd like to make a deep zoom-in from several images. For example, begin
with image1 (which was taken with a 50mm objective) and use the zoompan
filter to make a 5 seconds zoom-in from 1x to 4x, then use image2 (taken
with a 200mm objective) and continue to zoom in, and so on. There may
Am 04.02.2016 um 05:08 schrieb Kachhawal, Vijay P:
Hello Roman/Mr. Reindl Harald,
Thank you for all the help you both provided.
I am little upset with your below email. I am not sure, if this is the way this
forum
people respond to the queries from beginners.
So I don’t think putting such a n
76 matches
Mail list logo
