On Mon, 6 Feb 2023, at 23:43, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> I would advocate a light touch. Frankly, the rules have not been
> meaningfully enforced here for years
That's a good point.
But now, you've been warned. So now, you cannot say that you don't know.
Behave like kids, you will
Hello,
Please do not top-post on this list (that is, place your reply -below- what
you're quoting, not above (yes, you can do this with gmail).
On 2/2/2023 5:42 PM, Guddla Rupesh wrote:
Another intresting thing is that I have to downloaded the source code tar
ball of ffmpeg from its original
Hello;
I would advocate a light touch. Frankly, the rules have not been meaningfully
enforced here for years - more than a decade, in my experience. As such, list
users might very reasonably work on the assumption that they never would be,
and it may not be entirely fair to reproach people for
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 06:48:19PM +, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> On 2/5/2023 10:48 PM, Kieran O Leary wrote:
> > I'm really glad that some action has been taken.
>
> Same here.
>
> In addition, can/has the FAQ link been added to the list's Welcome message?
> That might help new members know
On 2/5/2023 10:48 PM, Kieran O Leary wrote:
I'm really glad that some action has been taken.
Same here.
In addition, can/has the FAQ link been added to the list's Welcome message?
That might help new members know what's expected.
Thanks,
z!
___
On 1/30/23 13:22, Ricardo Zacarias wrote:
I am trying to build a static ffmpeg to produce a .so file.
I was able to build FFmpeg into a Windows dll using this configuration.
./configure --extra-ldexeflags='-dll' --target-os=win64 --arch=x86_64 --toolchain=msvc
--prefix=/c/ffmpeg/out
