Re: [FFmpeg-user] What versions get point releases (active support)

B S wrote: >FFmpeg 5.0.1 "Lorentz" >FFmpeg 4.4.2 "Rao" >FFmpeg 4.3.4 "4:3" >FFmpeg 4.2.6 "Ada" >FFmpeg 4.1.9 "al-Khwarizmi" >FFmpeg 3.4.9 "Cantor" FFmpeg 3.4.10 >FFmpeg 3.2.16 "Hypatia" FFmpeg 3.2.17 >FFmpeg 2.8.18 "Feynman" Best regards, Reto AV Preservation by reto.ch zone industrielle

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffplay with Havision Makito X video encoder, H.264 stream, and "intra refresh" option enabled

Kevin Hise wrote: >Err...sample file of what? Of the file generated. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with

Re: [FFmpeg-user] how to convert *.cin into *.avi?

peter.lysyan...@gmail.com wrote: >Did you succeed to see any image from this file? This is a ULS >scan of the elbow of an arm. No, not the actual image. I could retrieve only a little shadows by using what I know about medical imaging. >What would you recommend instead of FFmpeg? I am afraid,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] how to convert *.cin into *.avi?

peter.lysyan...@gmail.com wrote: >Yes, this file is exported from SonoTouch ultrasound scanner. >Is there a chance to open this movie? Possibly. Yet, in my personal opinion, not with FFmpeg. (I probably misinterpreted as showing a liver cancer, therefore my question, but this device seems to be

Re: [FFmpeg-user] how to convert *.cin into *.avi?

Paul B Mahol wrote: >> Below is the link to demo.cin file in my Dropbox: >> >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/dta1swkn2ohl91l/demo.cin?dl=0 > >This file is not Cineon for sure. I agree. Is this image any related to medical imaging? ___ ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] how to convert *.cin into *.avi?

Paul B Mahol wrote: >FFmpeg currently does not have any support for Cineon (.cin >file extension with magic bytes 0x802a5fd7 at start) at all. If you force their lecture as DPX, then in my experience you can use them in FFmpeg. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing

Re: [FFmpeg-user] how to convert *.cin into *.avi?

Paul B Mahol wrote: >> Cineon (.cin) was a predecessor of DPX, introduced by Kodak as >> a digital postproduction format for cinema movies in the early >> 1990s, and today it's essentially one of its flavours. > >Do you have by any chance Cineon muxed into .mov container? Back then, Cineon were

Re: [FFmpeg-user] how to convert *.cin into *.avi?

peter.lysyan...@gmail.com wrote: >I was unable to use FFmpeg to convert the * .cin file to >* .avi. Cineon (.cin) was a predecessor of DPX, introduced by Kodak as a digital postproduction format for cinema movies in the early 1990s, and today it's essentially one of its flavours. Best regards,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Compatibility of FFMPEG builds

Moritz Barsnick wrote: >If 10.7 is a Mac OS X version (I'm guessing here): >The binaries linked from the ffmpeg website won't work. I guess... you guess right, Moritz! Ilja, it works if you compile the source code yourself, but I don't know either a build which works. Best regards, Reto

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg source code compatibility - OS X 10.9

Ilja wrote: >I downloaded the most recent build, installed >yasm assmebler, ran make to build ffmpeg as per instructions >and stumbled into lots of warnings, though the building process >completed seemingly well. If the compilation succeeded, ignore the warning. Best regards, Reto

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ff* command lines that work

Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >(Yes, FFmpeg is not that easily scriptable.) On my end, I mainly use FFmpeg commands within Perl or Bash scripts, and I am very happy with. FFmpeg is such an outstanding tool! Thanks! Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Since MacOS / Catalina upgrade - "Unable to find a suitable output format for 'h264_videotoolbox'"

MediaMouth wrote: >Ok, so here's what I'm working through >- The ffmpeg version I currently have, through Brew is 4.2.2 >- The stdout I posted suggests I ran 4.2.2 >- The version Carl suggests downloading from >https://ffmpeg.org/download.html suggests 4.2.2 is the latest >version >- But Carl

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Since MacOS / Catalina upgrade - "Unable to find a suitable output format for 'h264_videotoolbox'"

Am Do., 30. Jan. 2020 um 05:18 Uhr schrieb MediaMouth : > Is the latest version accessible through 'brew upgrade"? Yes, for both last release and head. Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Resolving -filter_complex overlay / -vf yadif conflicts in subprocess call Python script

digitensions via ffmpeg-user wrote: >I was having issues with the ‘ and “ options, In any case, do not use the typographically correct punctuation, but do use ' and ". Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFV1 and CELLAR

Noeck wrote: >To be sure, that means a video created with > >ffmpeg -i in.avi -c:a flac -c:v ffv1 -level 3 -coder 1 -context >1 -g 1 -slices 4 -slicecrc 1 out.mkv > >(or other settings between -coder and the output file) is >automatically CELLAR (v0-3) compliant (the FFV1.3 video, the >FLAC audio

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFV1 and CELLAR

Noeck wrote: >In other words, if I encode a video with current ffmpeg, will >the result be compliant to the IETF spec? If not, when will >that happen? There are actually two documents. The first one is documenting the current FFmpeg reference implementation of version, 3 and considers as well

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Perform Static Build If FFmpeg In macOS

wyattwong--- via ffmpeg-user wrote: >How can I perform a static build of FFmpeg in macOS so that >there is only one executable file ? Not sure I understand you carefully. There are static builds for many platforms, including macOS: https://ffmpeg.org/download.html and the wiki explains how

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg DeckLink capture doesn't work

Rik Roukens wrote: >Goal: Capture video from the DeckLink Duo 2 and write it to >output.avi Have you considered using vrecord? https://github.com/amiaopensource/vrecord Hope this helps! Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Can FFmpeg convert from ArriRaw MXF sources?

Ted Park wrote: >Also, raw files from camera sensors in general aren’t just >decoded, they’re rendered to a colorspace. Wouldn’t you want to >review the original (for grading, etc) before doing anything >with it using ffmpeg? Yep! ___ ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] dpx version 2 image sequence to ffv1 mkv

Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >Iirc, here is a tool by Jerome that does act like a file >archiving system for dpx files (and uses ffv1 internally). Indeed, you {recall, remember} correctly! RAWcooked by Jérôme Martinez, allows both to store e.g. DPX files into Матрёшка by using FFV1 and to retrieve

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Meaning of ffprobe output

Ulf Zibis wrote: >Does the 'p' in yuv420p mean "progressive"? No, it means "planar". Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg 4.0.2 and above missing 'ffio_open_dyn_packet_buf' from avformat.lib & avformat.dll

Dinesh Gupta wrote: >While building 'ffmpeg' 4.0.2 Is there any reason for using this? The current release of the 4.0 branch is 4.0.3 (since 3rd November) and the most recent branch is 4.1 (since 6th November). Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ProRes422 with 8 audio tracks converted to mp4 -- muffles audio 4

Harvey Pikelberger wrote: >Is there something about ProRes files in general that makes >the audio layout unrecognizable? The container is QuickTime (.mov) or Matroska (.mkv), while ProRes is the video codec, which has nothing to do with the audio streams. Best regards, Reto

Re: [FFmpeg-user] uncompressed RGB within MXF

Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >I wonder if metadata is really sufficient to decode an mxf >file... In my personal opinion, no. Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To

Re: [FFmpeg-user] TXXX:CATALOGNUMBER

yUGz afterLife wrote: >-metadata TXXX:CATALOGNUMBER=’plop' ^ Don't use typographer's quote. And, again, don't top-post. Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Question about conversion (Transcoding)

JD wrote: ffprobe version N-51556-ge278500 Copyright (c) 2007-2013 the FFmpeg developers This is a very old version! Please update to the latest release or, even better, to the HEAD. Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Colour metadata not preserved when re-encoding ProRes/mov to FFV1/mkv

Peter B. wrote: On 24/07/18 21:47, Reto Kromer wrote: We do rewrap ProRes into Matroska. Which is the reason for transcoding it to FFV1? ...I guess the usual "way out" of proprietary formats? As well as format normalization (to have less mixed codecs). The problem I see in t

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Colour metadata not preserved when re-encoding ProRes/mov to FFV1/mkv

W M wrote: >At the Irish Film Institute Film Archive, we are investigating >the technicalities of normalising ProRes materials to FFV1, We do rewrap ProRes into Matroska. Which is the reason for transcoding it to FFV1? Best regards, Reto ___

Re: [FFmpeg-user] unsubscribe

Mark Perry wrote: To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". >>> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >>> ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Best way to transmit an audio stream without loss of compression of a linux computer under windows with FFMPEG

Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >I wonder if recording with 192kHz makes sense, this is >far above what a human ear can do iirc. Indeed! Usually it makes sense only if you have very bad material and need to apply heavy restoration, otherwise 96 kHz is very fine for archival and 48 kHz for usage. Best

Re: [FFmpeg-user] 4K 60Hz Directshow Video Capture

William Caulfield wrote: >haven't used Windows / Directshow for a few years, but back in >the day I would have attempted this using VirtualDub and >HuffYUV. I believe that HuffYUV is available for ffmpeg, but >can't say that I've ever tried it. Indeed, FFmpeg's flavour of HuffYUV is even better

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Error converting 4K DCP

Carles Vila wrote: >ffmpeg version 2.7.2 Copyright (c) 2000-2015 the FFmpeg >developers You might possibly wish to upgrade to the current release 3.3.4. Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] MTS to MP4 lossless conversion issues

Holger Jurna wrote: >Hi, I would like to unsubscribe from this mailing list. Please read the end of any email you received. >> > > > > > ___ >> > > > > > ffmpeg-user mailing list >> > > > > > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org >> > > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Libraries missing?

Moritz Barsnick wrote: >Does anyone ever read the complete thread? Michelle reported >that that was solved in this email: >http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-user/2017-July/036829.html Yes, and as said two or three times, it actually does work well with the current release (also without the

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Libraries missing?

Michelle wrote: >Yes, I have a snippit here - >http://msknight.com/bbc/videos/MOV015.MOD Thank you! I'm afrain, on my side it transcodes well to MP4 with FFmpeg 3.3.3. I don't get the error message you mentioned at the beginning. I have compiled with: brew install ffmpeg --with-sdl2

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Libraries missing?

Nicolas George wrote: >You realize these counts as distributions, do you not? Actually each one can compile with the specific options they need, which is not possible with "classic" distributions. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Libraries missing?

Reindl Harald wrote: >no *enduser* right in his mind don't use the >development master of *any* software - period +1 I already stressed out in the past the importance of the releases for the end user community. Many audio-visual archives do actually use - and keep up to date - FFmpeg via

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Libraries missing?

msknight wrote: >ffmpeg version 2.8.11-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 You should update to the current version of your branch, or - even better! - to the brand new 3.3.3. Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Compile FFmpeg with openssl in mac without Homebrew?

willin wrote: >It looks homebrew is the easiest one for mac users to use >ffmpeg which I haven't tried before. Homebrew is indeed a good way to install and keep updated FFmpeg on macOS (and Linuxbrew almost that good on different Linuxes, including the Windows Subsystem for Linux). Hope this

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFMPEG and OCIO

Kevin Wheatley wrote: >On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos > wrote: >> What is OCIO? > >OpenColorIO http://opencolorio.org/ > > >I'll say that adding OCIO to FFmpeg is not simple in the >general sense. The two packages are not in the same space, >OCIO is mostly

Re: [FFmpeg-user] m3u8 = non-monotonous DTS

Moritz Barsnick wrote: >Why do you need a release, anyway? The question about the releases is asked from time to time. I don't use releases myself, but I always advise AV archivists, who implement FFmpeg in their workflow, to use the last release of an actively maintained branch. Why? Because

Re: [FFmpeg-user] essence MD5

ganesh.ire...@syda.org wrote: >ffmpeg -i "INPUT" -map 0:a -f md5 -hash md5 - Add "-loglevel quiet". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Create a video using images and audio with blend and zoom filters using FFmpeg

Nikhil M Ranka wrote: >ffmpeg version N-63893-gc69defd Copyright (c) 2000-2014 >the FFmpeg developers built on Oct 31 2014 05:16:04 As Carl Eugen already mentioned, you should really update. Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] "-acodec copy -vcodec copy" output smaller than original

Olexandr Melnyk wrote: >ffmpeg version 2.8.4 Copyright (c) 2000-2015 Please update to the last release or the current HEAD. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and webm format and mkv format

Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >Which date are you talking about? The release date integrated into the version designation. This would definitively make it more human readable. Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg and webm format and mkv format

Phil Rhodes wrote: >>> Using ffmpeg version N-51556-ge278500 > > >> That version of ffmpeg is from April 2013. > >How do you tell? >Serious question. In my opinion, it would be useful indeed to have a version numbering that includes the actual date, like e.g.: 2016-09-15-01234567 Yet I am

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Decklink Recording Yields No Audio

Adam Lott wrote: >I'm >including screenshots of my results to better show what >happened. Please copy and paste the console output on this list. This makes answering much easier. Thank you! Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Stream Channel With Subtitle

Eng.Hany Ahmed wrote: >this is not work with this stream i wrote the full command >and the output log without cut in the attachment file >please tell me why not work Please: 1) don't top post on this list; 2) update your version as already suggested by Moritz; 3) put the command and output

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFmpeg output problems !!!

Walid Salman wrote: >How i get the last full ffmpeg : >In linux See: http://ffmpeg.org/download.html or use Linuxbrew: http://linuxbrew.sh/ Hope this helps! Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] FFMPEG - Concatenate 2 MP4 Files, one has video and audio and the other has only audio

Avinash Jairam wrote: >ffmpeg -f concat -i filesToMerge.txt -c copy output.mp4 Do you specify absolute file paths? This may help: https://amiaopensource.github.io/ffmprovisr/#join_files >ffmpeg version N-76944-g15206ff Copyright (c) 2000-2015 Please consider updating to the current git head

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Duration Issues

Celso Junior wrote: >ffmpeg version 2.8.6-1ubuntu2 Copyright (c) 2000-2016 the FFmpeg developers > built with gcc 5.3.1 (Ubuntu 5.3.1-11ubuntu1) 20160311 Please update to HEAD or version 3.1.1. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg failing to get JSON data from file

Keith Reilly wrote: >ffprobe version 0.7.4 That's old! I guess the current release should be: ffprobe version 3.0.2 Or use the HEAD. You may reinstall --with-ffplay. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg failing to get JSON data from file

Keith Reilly wrote: >-loglevel quiet didn't give me errors. But it didn't give >me any output either. I took out that part of the command. >Looked like this: > >ffprobe -print_format json -show_format -show_streams >file.mp4 Works fine on my side (both with and without the -loglevel quiet

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Syntax problem for specifying files(?)

aviv solodoch wrote: >I'm trying to create a movie from a series of .png files. >The file names are of the form "NWAT_Vort_GB_.pg", >where is a 4 digit number. The lowest value is =1148. > >I write in my windows command shell, from the same folder as the .png files: > >ffmpeg -f

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Building FFmpeg with OpenJPEG 2.0

Emre Besirik wrote: >I think it is only you who for some reason hates to read >top post mails and the rest of the worlds 99% of population >doesn’t have any problems writing or reading from top or >bottom? I also really appreciate this highly sensitive rule. And I disagree with you - and with

Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user

Martín Capón Borrego wrote: >Tell me what I am wrong 1. Do not top post on this list. 2. Use subject lines describing the content. 3. Review you messages before posting. 4. Read the answers you receive. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] New user

Hello Martín: Why the hell do you not respect the elementary rules on this list? You are incredibly impolite indeed! Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Samsung video files

Satinder Singh wrote: >Sorry . Sir , I apologize . And it would also be most appreciated, if you avoid top posting on this list. Thank you! Best regards, Reto ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffprobe: "bpr" = bits_per_sample?

Peter B. wrote: >The value of "bpr" seems to stand for bits_per_sample. "bits_per_raw_sample" is the number of bits for each sample, commonly 8, 9, 10 or 16. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg -g option

Parag Goyal IMD, Applied Chemistry, IT-BHU, Varanasi (INDIA) wrote: And regarding top-posting , is there any protocols to be followed while posting on this mailing list . If yes , my apologies and please let me know them. Again wrong! May this help? Moritz Barsnick wrote: P.S.: A: Because it

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Alexa input dpx

These references could also be useful for the DPX discussion: Bob Friesenhahn: SMPTE 268M-2003 Specification Inadequacies, 2005-12-03 http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/dpx/dpx-issues.pdf Bob Friesenhahn: SMPTE 268M (DPX) Byte Order Issues, 2006-08-22

Re: [FFmpeg-user] How can I determine if a 10bit videofile has full 10bit video data or 8bit (+ 2bits zeros) data

://code.google.com/p/corkami/ Hope this helps! Reto Reto Kromer | AV Preservation by reto.ch ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user