Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-10-26 Thread Reindl Harald
or use a serious client if it's too hard to compose a message properly what exactly do you like so much - that are basics i bet it also can do better than "(no subject)" _______ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.o

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-10-26 Thread Carl Zwanzig
On 10/26/2020 4:22 PM, juan carlos rebate wrote: It is not my intention to do top posting, this is because I do not like to use mail apps, I like the graphical interface web, and this does not have options to avoid it Yes it does, I do that all the time, both in the android app and in a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-10-26 Thread juan carlos rebate
It is not my intention to do top posting, this is because I do not like to use mail apps, I like the graphical interface web, and this does not have options to avoid it De: Carl Zwanzig Enviado: lunes, 26 de octubre de 2020 6:44 Para: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org Asunto: Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-10-25 Thread Carl Zwanzig
On 10/25/2020 10:14 PM, Juan carlos Rebate wrote: However if you compile two separate versions there would be no licensing issue if you share it, would it? If you "share" the build, then technically you're distributing it. The one that's GPL only is perfectly fine to share (following the

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-10-25 Thread Juan carlos Rebate
_ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-10-25 Thread Carl Zwanzig
On 10/25/2020 9:16 PM, Juan carlos Rebate wrote: my question is derived from the license problem that does not allow gpl codecs together with non-free codecs I may be mistaken, but as I understand the GPL, if you're not distributing anything (building for your own use), there are no license

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-10-25 Thread Juan carlos Rebate
able-nonfree is not specified. > how can I use both combinations? thanks > ___ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ff

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-10-25 Thread Juan carlos Rebate
Hello, I am still engrossed in the previous topic of the screenshot, if I got it to work thanks to your help but I do not get the optimal quality results, this leads me to the conclusion that there is some option not available in the compilation, so I I decided to compile it from source, but as I

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-09-23 Thread vinod kc
Hi, I have a video with 45 minutes duration. This video contains 2-5 breaks. Each break time lasts 10 seconds. At this time, the screen is completely black. But, we can see a watermark and time code clearly. So I want to get; 1. The start and end time of this black screen break. 2. The time code

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-06-29 Thread Leonardo via ffmpeg-user
Hello, I'm trying to use ffmpeg to record the computer screen and also audio from microfone. Googling I found a lot of "how to". Although I can now record, I do have a few questions (3): 1) Using command $ ffmpeg -thread_queue_size 512 -f alsa -ac 2 -ar 44100 -i hw:0,0 -video_size 1024x768

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-05-07 Thread Nasser Nano
Hi everyone, > can j download video from straming video site that are DRm protected ? > thanks ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-04-24 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Am Fr., 24. Apr. 2020 um 10:01 Uhr schrieb Tajti Krisztian : > I have an issue where I start merging video and audio > and my mac will render it for a long time and also the file size > does not match the sum of the video and audio. > I tried it on a pc and it does it in one second (without

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-04-24 Thread Tajti Krisztian
Hi, I have an issue where I start merging video and audio and my mac will render it for a long time and also the file size does not match the sum of the video and audio. I tried it on a pc and it does it in one second (without rendering), and the file size is the sum of the audio and video file.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-03-08 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
> Am 08.03.2020 um 08:23 schrieb ASHIM TOM : > > Why is ffplay binary is not getting compiled? Why do you send emails without a subject? Why are you not showing us your configure line? You have to install the sdl2 development package. Carl Eugen

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2020-03-07 Thread ASHIM TOM
Why is ffplay binary is not getting compiled? Only ffmpeg and ffprobe are compiled I used the official repo to build ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2019-08-23 Thread Michael Castellon
e, or email > ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2019-08-23 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Am Sa., 24. Aug. 2019 um 00:16 Uhr schrieb Michael Castellon : > > FFmpeg users, please you help. > > ffplay -devices ffplay uses sdl for output, none of the FFmpeg "devices". Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2019-08-23 Thread Michael Castellon
FFmpeg users, please you help. ffplay -devices Devices: D. = Demuxing supported .E = Muxing supported -- DE alsaALSA audio output DE fbdev Linux framebuffer D lavfi Libavfilter virtual input device DE oss OSS (Open Sound System) playback E

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2019-04-25 Thread lastkill
hi! i need to know if ffmpeg.exe uses Gpu or cpu when we use it to convert video to number of images? ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2019-03-08 Thread Louis Letourneau
Has anyone managed to capture a feed using the "USB Capture SDI 4k" from Magewell with ffmpeg? It runs for awhile but then a 0 byte packet comes along and ffmped just stops. It doesn't quit, but the frame number just stops and it doesn't do anything after rhis. I saw 2 bugs from 2014 and both

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2018-09-13 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-09-13 18:32 GMT+02:00, Peter Gusev : > Video plays back correctly color-wise and size-wise. However > it "scrolls" vertically all the time Does this also happen if you only use ffplay? $ ffplay -f avfoundation -framerate 25 -pixel_format uyvy422 -i "0" Please test current FFmpeg git head.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2018-08-01 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-08-01 17:35 GMT+02:00, juan carlos rebate : > How could I edit video without reconverting this video? For example, > add a watermark This is (generally) impossible and not related to FFmpeg. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2018-08-01 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 01.08.2018 um 17:35 schrieb juan carlos rebate: > How could I edit video without reconverting this video? For example, add a > watermark, or delete a frame and that the format and quality do not change. > The commands -c copy or -vcodec and -acodec copy does not have the desired > effect,

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2018-08-01 Thread juan carlos rebate
How could I edit video without reconverting this video? For example, add a watermark, or delete a frame and that the format and quality do not change. The commands -c copy or -vcodec and -acodec copy does not have the desired effect, although these commands supposedly are for that the result is

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2018-06-07 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 20:46:44 +0100, Anthony Griffiths wrote: > re-stream this to ffserver (on the same machine) using > ffmpeg-0.10.16-1.el6.x86_64 that I installed with yum. Sorry, this version is *extremely* outdated. It was last maintained three years ago, presumably just with security

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2018-06-07 Thread Anthony Griffiths
I have a live video stream on a centos 6 server that can be viewed at http://198.91.92.112:90/mobile/index.m3u8 using nginx and I'm trying to re-stream this to ffserver (on the same machine) using ffmpeg-0.10.16-1.el6.x86_64 that I installed with yum. The output video from ffmpeg can be viewed at

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2017-04-17 Thread Reuben Martin
On Monday, April 17, 2017 6:22:18 AM CDT Erik Slagter wrote: > > according to mp4box tutorials that I have read about making mpeg-dash, I > > know that I have to set keyint and minkey int equal and also related to > > segment duration. so I tries using min-keyint=100, but the result video > > had

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2017-04-17 Thread Erik Slagter
On 17-04-17 13:25, negin tebyani wrote: >> Do the tutorials also explain why you would ever want to use a braindead >> (!) fixed gop size in the first place? >> >> I could imagine a requirement for a closed gop type, but really not why >> you'd want to be gop's always exactly the same length,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2017-04-17 Thread negin tebyani
mp4box group has said that gop length has to be fixed and the same lengh for input videos, otherwise the dash video will not play well. > Do the tutorials also explain why you would ever want to use a braindead > (!) fixed gop size in the first place? > > I could imagine a requirement for a

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2017-04-17 Thread Erik Slagter
according to mp4box tutorials that I have read about making mpeg-dash, I know that I have to set keyint and minkey int equal and also related to segment duration. so I tries using min-keyint=100, but the result video had the min-keyint=51 Do the tutorials also explain why you would ever want to

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2017-04-17 Thread negin tebyani
I have two videos that I encoded them with ffmpeg, like: ffmpeg -i 1_med.mp4 -movflags faststart -c:v libx264 -x264opts 'keyint=100:min-keyint=25:no-scenecut:8x8dct:sliced-threads=0' -deblock 1:1 -flags +loop -b:v 850k -maxrate 850k -bufsize 2000k -nal-hrd cbr -vf

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Phil Rhodes rocketmail.com> writes: > That's "manners," you insolent prick. Thank you for correcting me, as you probably assumed, I am not a native speaker. [...] > Please be aware that you are tolerated for your technical > knowledge That surprises me very much given that among all

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Moritz Barsnick gmx.net> writes: > With that very old version of ffmpeg, he would have to, > as it doesn't support "-to". Which imo makes the whole try to support the OP less helpful, sorry. Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread RDP
On 24 Jul 2016 6:09 p.m., "Phil Rhodes" wrote: > > I have also criticised Carl Eugen when he's been >rude, which even his greatest admirer would have to >admit is something he does almost constantly. With all due respect, would it not be bright and better idea to take

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 18:16:14 +0200, Cley Faye wrote: > of your input might change. The "-t" option allows you to specify a > duration instead of a timestamp if this is an issue. With that very old version of ffmpeg, he would have to, as it doesn't support "-to". ;-) > If I'm not wrong, your

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Phil Rhodes
> you are trolling over years here This is not true. I have pointed out problems with some of the basic video engineering in ffmpeg.  I have also criticised Carl Eugen when he's been rude, which even his greatest admirer would have to admit is something he does almost constantly. I'm not here to

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.07.2016 um 18:56 schrieb Phil Rhodes: Please understand that this has changed now, you are not> allowed anymore to speak open on our mailing lists, you > have to suppress you arrogant manors. That's "manners," you insolent prick. But in any case, the idea that I'm going to accept

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread RDP
On 24 Jul 2016 5:51 p.m., "Nicolas George" wrote: > > Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXXIV, RDP a écrit : > > (.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam folder.. > > That means your spam filter does its job. I know! Though there *was* an intentional double

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Phil Rhodes
> Please understand that this has changed now, you are not> allowed anymore to >speak open on our mailing lists, you > have to suppress you arrogant manors. That's "manners," you insolent prick. But in any case, the idea that I'm going to accept advice from you on good behaviour is hilarious.

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.07.2016 um 18:51 schrieb Nicolas George: Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXXIV, RDP a écrit : (.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam folder.. That means your spam filter does its job or it does an d the yahoo server which randomly was used for that message was

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Nicolas George
Le septidi 7 thermidor, an CCXXIV, RDP a écrit : > (.. incidentally, Phil, your list email also ended up in my spam folder.. That means your spam filter does its job. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Phil Rhodes rocketmail.com> writes: > That's his problem - it's nothing to do with you. This is (unfortunately!) not correct: As you have pointed out, I give support to users on this mailing list. Where I live, I may be made responsible for not telling users that they are using (old)

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread RDP
On 24 Jul 2016 5:30 p.m., "Carl Eugen Hoyos" wrote: > > Phil Rhodes rocketmail.com> writes: > > Please, if you aren't interested in getting involved > > in a discussion, simply ignore it. > > Yes, this is what I would honestly like you to do. > > But as I learned over the last

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Phil Rhodes
> The version used by the OP has known security issues> and known bugs. Nobody >stepped forward over the last > years to continue support for it, so we do >know that > it actually is unsupported. That's his problem - it's nothing to do with you. If someone wants to ask a question here and

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Phil Rhodes rocketmail.com> writes: > > As explained, this is not supported > Well, Carl Eugen, it may not be supported by you, It isn't. > but other people may be able to help. No. The version used by the OP has known security issues and known bugs. Nobody stepped forward over the last

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Phil Rhodes
> As explained, this is not supported Well, Carl Eugen, it may not be supported by you, but other people may be able to help. Please, if you aren't interested in getting involved in a discussion, simply ignore it. -Phil ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Cley Faye
2016-07-24 17:45 GMT+02:00 Walid Salman : > > [root@ns1 ~] > ​​ > # ffmpeg -i /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -ss > 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -c copy /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4 > > the server show this error : > > FFmpeg version 0.6.5, Copyright (c)

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread RDP
On 24 Jul 2016 4:45 p.m., "Walid Salman" wrote: > I have an video and neet to split it, so I use this command : > > [root@ns1 ~]# ffmpeg -i /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -ss > 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -c copy /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4 > > the server show

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-24 Thread Walid Salman
Hello, I have an video and neet to split it, so I use this command : [root@ns1 ~]# ffmpeg -i /home/lamas44747/public_html/sarmaye.mp4 -ss 00:00:10 -to 00:00:20 -c copy /home/lamas44747/public_html/split.mp4 the server show this error : FFmpeg version 0.6.5, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-20 Thread Roger Pack
On 7/15/16, Tim Hiles wrote: > Hi all, > > Seeing odd behavior with screen capture recorder. > > This always works on win 7. No problems. Even when resolution is set to > 1920 x 1080 > > c:\ffmpeg\ffmpeg\bin\ffmpeg.exe -f dshow -i >

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-16 Thread Reindl Harald
"(no subject)" will attract many people and give a good future ressource in list-archives - what mail client allows that without aksing if you are serious and why don't you just compose a mail from top to bottom how others read and stop at "no subject"? why don't mailman reject such posts?

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-07-15 Thread Tim Hiles
Hi all, Seeing odd behavior with screen capture recorder. This always works on win 7. No problems. Even when resolution is set to 1920 x 1080 c:\ffmpeg\ffmpeg\bin\ffmpeg.exe -f dshow -i video="screen-capture-recorder":audio="Microphone Array (Realtek High Definition Audio)" -vcodec libx264

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-04-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.04.2016 um 14:51 schrieb Ivan Cacique: I'm having serious problems with the latest versions of ffmpeg with constants lockups Since ffmpeg-20160310-git-689211d-win64-static * no subject * no real problem description * just wow

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-04-05 Thread Ivan Cacique
I'm having serious problems with the latest versions of ffmpeg with constants lockups . Since ffmpeg-20160310-git-689211d-win64-static Ivan ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

2016-02-16 Thread lou
Everyone is tired of the bickering in this thread (and stinks of another recent argurethread). If there are more similar replies I will set a moderation flag, and then your messsages will be stuck in the dank, bottomless pit of the mod queue. ___

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

2016-02-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.02.2016 um 21:13 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:46 PM, "Reindl Harald" pontificated: Am 16.02.2016 um 20:26 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: I am not trying to "destroy" your ancient list software. If it's that fragile,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

2016-02-16 Thread satelliteviewer
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:46 PM, "Reindl Harald" pontificated: > Am 16.02.2016 um 20:26 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: >> I am not trying to "destroy" your ancient list software. If it's that >> fragile, maybe it's time to retire it! > maybe you have noe

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

2016-02-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.02.2016 um 20:26 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: I am not trying to "destroy" your ancient list software. If it's that fragile, maybe it's time to retire it! maybe you have noe clue was threading means here you see it in reality:

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

2016-02-16 Thread Reindl Harald
problem to post plaintext? enhanced text messages? get a useable mailclient - press "reply to list" and that's it Am 16.02.2016 um 20:26 schrieb satellitevie...@gmx.ca: On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:16 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: why do you destroy a list-thread

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject) (It should have been: Re: Has the syntax changed for audio remapping in ffmpeg 3.0?)

2016-02-16 Thread satelliteviewer
On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:16 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote: > why do you destroy a list-thread by compose a new message witout a > subject instead reply to the previous post? Sorry!!! Next time maybe I should not bother trying to thank someone for helping me! It

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-02-16 Thread Reindl Harald
why do you destroy a list-thread by compose a new message witout a subject instead reply to the previous post? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2016-02-16 Thread satelliteviewer
  On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:59:24 +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote:   >> pipe:///usr/local/bin/ffmpeg -loglevel fatal -i >> http://127.0.0.1:9981/stream/channelnumber/CHANNEL_NUMBER -c:v copy -c:s >> copy -c:d copy -c:t copy -filter_complex >>

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2015-11-22 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 16:03:02 -0700, Jim Worrall wrote: > Can you apply a bitstream filter when you are just copying the > stream? Yes, you can. A bitstream filter operates on a different level than encoding. > Wouldn’t that require transcoding? No. And it worked for the first 15 minutes...

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2015-11-22 Thread Moritz Barsnick
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 14:57:42 -0500, Ming Luo wrote: > And if I trim the original 18 min video to 15 minutes, it works. To me this indicates that there is some error in the video stream which ffmpeg can't handle. Sorry, I don't know more than that (such as whether ffmpeg should handle that, or

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2015-11-21 Thread Jim Worrall
> On 2015 Nov 21, at 12:57 PM, Ming Luo wrote: > > Hi, guys, > > I installed ffmpeg-2.8.2 on Mac and run in command line: > > ffmpeg -i firstTake.mp4 -vcodec copy -acodec copy -vbsf h264_mp4toannexb > firstTake.ts > > and get the following result with some errors. For

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2015-11-21 Thread Ming Luo
Thanks, Jim. The purpose of my command is to convert the video file (*.mp4) into an h264_mp4 container (*.ts), so that, command mediafilesegmenter can take the *.ts file to convert it into hls format and stream it. Since I just change a container, I don't really transcode, so I just use -vcodec

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2015-11-21 Thread Ming Luo
Hi, guys, I installed ffmpeg-2.8.2 on Mac and run in command line: ffmpeg -i firstTake.mp4 -vcodec copy -acodec copy -vbsf h264_mp4toannexb firstTake.ts and get the following result with some errors. For each time running, the error happens at different time positions. And if I trim the

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2015-10-11 Thread juan carlos Rebate
good afternoon to you all membros of the list,The first excuse me for my bad English,also indicate that disables the format but google still sending emails format. I wonder if someone can advise me on several questions: 1 How you can broadcast live including a watermark? 2 How I can change

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2014-12-01 Thread Guido Holz
Thanks! but is there any way to avoid that with ffmpeg? What is the reason to get an export of Premiere with another starttime than zero? it's not always trivial to me :-) thanks 2014-12-01 8:49 GMT+01:00 tim nicholson nichot20-at-yahoo@ffmpeg.org: On 28/11/14 14:50, Guido Holz wrote:

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2014-12-01 Thread tim nicholson
On 01/12/14 16:35, Guido Holz wrote: Thanks! Please do not top post, it makes following things harder. but is there any way to avoid that with ffmpeg? Uae -ss wiith the same value as the original file start time What is the reason to get an export of Premiere with another starttime than

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2014-12-01 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
tim nicholson nichot20-at-yahoo.com at ffmpeg.org writes: [...] :\ ffmpeg.exe -i before.mp4 [...] Duration: 00:02:00.00, start: 0.04, bitrate: 70 kb/s [..] ffmpeg.exe -i after.mp4 [..] Duration: 00:02:00.04, start: 0.00, bitrate: 17 kb/s This has little meaning imo,

Re: [FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2014-11-30 Thread tim nicholson
On 28/11/14 14:50, Guido Holz wrote: my problem is after exporting from Adobe Premiere and postwork with ffmpeg I get more frames of each mp4-footage. I minimalized it to the following example: [...] :\ ffmpeg.exe -i before.mp4 [...] Duration: 00:02:00.00, start: 0.04, bitrate: 70

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2014-11-28 Thread Guido Holz
my problem is after exporting from Adobe Premiere and postwork with ffmpeg I get more frames of each mp4-footage. I minimalized it to the following example: I exported 2:00.0 min of black-screen from Adobe Premiere and after encoding it through ffmpeg like :\ffmpeg.exe -y -i before.mp4

[FFmpeg-user] (no subject)

2014-08-08 Thread Takeshi Mizumoto
Hello all, I am trying to grab audio from a USB microphone device and video from a webcam, and send it to ffserver. The audio codec is flac, the video codec is theora, and the container is ogg. I succeeded this when I store the video to a ogg file. However, I fail to send it to the ffserver.