Ok Paul, nice to know about the FLAC encoder, I'll check it out!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 6:53 PM Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> On 3/31/2022 1:19 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > Provocations are not tolerated here.
>
> Really? What changed?
>
>
If you keep provocative behavior, then you will be banned.
z!
> ___
> ffmpeg-user
On 3/31/2022 1:19 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
Provocations are not tolerated here.
Really? What changed?
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
Am 31.03.22 um 22:19 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
P.S.: Let's see what kind of insults this contribution provokes.
Provocations are not tolerated here
lol
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Am 31.03.22 um 21:56 schrieb Wolfgang Hugemann:
because I can create .bat files and convert multiple files at once.
The original FLAC encoder also has a command line interface, and I
actually used it for bulk conversion of WAVs via batch. For just audio
conversion, I would rather use the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 9:12 PM Wolfgang Hugemann wrote:
> I would rather use FLACs original frontend (than ffmpeg), which also
> provides a nice Windows GUI interface. FLAC conversion is also included
> in a variety of software products, i.e. Exact Audio Copy, which I used
> to rip all my music
because I can create .bat files and convert multiple files at once.
The original FLAC encoder also has a command line interface, and I
actually used it for bulk conversion of WAVs via batch. For just audio
conversion, I would rather use the original software than ffmpeg.
In regard to VBR: I
>
> well, that's a number for new tracks where i consider before or after
> the first coffee - OK, to be honest for 1800 songs it may take two hours
> including start playing and flag ballads in the ID3-Tags :-)
>
> 83490 tracks
> 78796 unique tracks (filtered live/unpligged..)
> 76069 lyrics
>
>
Am 31.03.22 um 00:24 schrieb CMG DiGiTaL:
I have approximately 1800 songs on my PC
well, that's a number for new tracks where i consider before or after
the first coffee - OK, to be honest for 1800 songs it may take two hours
including start playing and flag ballads in the ID3-Tags :-)
>
> I would rather use FLACs original frontend (than ffmpeg), which also
> provides a nice Windows GUI interface. FLAC conversion is also included
> in a variety of software products, i.e. Exact Audio Copy, which I used
> to rip all my music CDs.
>
Hi Wolfgang,
I also use Exact Audio Copy, the
I would rather use FLACs original frontend (than ffmpeg), which also
provides a nice Windows GUI interface. FLAC conversion is also included
in a variety of software products, i.e. Exact Audio Copy, which I used
to rip all my music CDs.
Wolfgang Hugemann
P.S.: Let's see what kind of insults
>
> no - what you need to understand is what you deal with, no matter the
> topic - a foll with a tool is still a fool :-)
>
> in case of a LOSSLESS codec the bitrate don't matter - that's common
> sense - translate it to compression efficiency and by common sense it
> depends on the content
Am 29.03.22 um 22:20 schrieb CMG DiGiTaL:
seems like you still didn't understand the repsonse to your other thread
- FLAC is *lossless* - forget your MP3 knowledge when you deal with FLAC
Reindl Harald,
What I really need to understand is Mediainfo!
no - what you need to understand is
>
> seems like you still didn't understand the repsonse to your other thread
> - FLAC is *lossless* - forget your MP3 knowledge when you deal with FLAC
>
Reindl Harald,
What I really need to understand is Mediainfo!
thanks
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
>
> Default compression value in ffmpeg is 5
> So for maximum lossless compression use
> ffmpeg -i "input.wav" -af aformat=s16:44100 -c:a flac -compression_level
> 12 "output.flac"
>
Okay Ferdi, thanks.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
Am 29.03.22 um 17:16 schrieb CMG DiGiTaL:
I'm using the command below to convert from wav to flac:
ffmpeg -i "input.wav" -af aformat=s16:44100 "output.flac"
The bit-depth and sample_rate are ok, but is the command converting the
audio from CBR to VBR
seems like you still didn't understand
I'm using the command below to convert from wav to flac:
ffmpeg -i "input.wav" -af aformat=s16:44100 "output.flac"
The bit-depth and sample_rate are ok, but is the command converting the
audio from CBR to VBR.
What should I add in the above command, or what command should I use for
the audio
I'm using the command below to convert from wav to flac:
ffmpeg -i "input.wav" -af aformat=s16:44100 "output.flac"
The bit-depth and sample_rate are ok, but is the command converting the
audio from CBR to VBR.
What should I add in the above command, or what command should I use for
the audio to
18 matches
Mail list logo
