Kieran O Leary gmail.com> writes:
> > I originally wanted to suggest replicating with FFmpeg alone
> > (without an external source file) but feel free to use the
> > mentioned file.
> >
>
> Do you mean that I should use -f lavfi to generate a sample? If
> so , I can try to do this.
I first
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>
> I originally wanted to suggest replicating with FFmpeg alone
> (without an external source file) but feel free to use the
> mentioned file.
>
Do you mean that I should use -f lavfi to generate a sample? If so , I
Kieran O Leary gmail.com> writes:
> > Feel free to open a ticket.
>
> Will do. Let me know if any further info or testing should
> go into the trac report.
I'd love to see a saner FFmpeg version string there
(but that's only me) ;-)
I originally wanted to suggest replicating with FFmpeg
Hi Carl,
Thanks for replying.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Which - without really verifying myself! - are probably
> the correct display dimensions for the given input.
>
> I don't know why FFmpeg writes display dimensions instead
> of DAR: My
Kieran O Leary gmail.com> writes:
> I posted a similar issue recently where an unknown SAR was
> declared as 1:1 when stream copied to matroska.
Allow me to repeat that this is not correct:
If SAR is unknown, no sar is written to mkv output (when
stream copied or reencoded).
The demuxer does
Hello,
I posted a similar issue recently where an unknown SAR was declared as
1:1 when stream copied to matroska.
I think this is a different issue because the SAR is declared in the
source in this instance. I am running some tests on the xiph/derf
collection and found that a lot of the videos