On 2021-03-02 11:53, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 5:50 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
wrote:
I've searched the docs one-by-one. I seek a simpler way to repeat a frame.
This:
> Am 02.03.2021 um 03:41 schrieb KRISHNAKUMAR N K :
>
> I have followed ffmpeg compilation guide "
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/CompilationGuide/Centos; and its successful,
> would like to know FFmpeg is 64bit by default (or) should i need to enable
> any flags / properties.
This only
> Am 02.03.2021 um 07:37 schrieb 梦开始的地方 <382607...@qq.com>:
>
> I use it on linux，how to compile ffmpeg with video4linux support kona
Every Linux binary by default comes with video4linux2 support, you have to
actively disable it if you don’t want it.
Carl Eugen
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 15:17:40 +0100, PPRJ01 wrote:
> But ... I don't understand what you are planning to do.
I'm not planning to do anything. I checked whether this could easily be
fixed, but it cannot with my knowledge.
> Please tell me if I'm right or wrong :
> - ffprobe/ffmpeg will display
I've searched the docs one-by-one. I seek a simpler way to repeat a frame.
This:
split[1][2],[1]setpts=(N+floor(N/4))/FR/TB[3],[2]select=eq(mod(n\,4)\,3),setpts=(N*5+4)/FR/TB[4],[3][4]interleave
works, but perhaps there's an easier way that I'm just not seeing.
Suggestions are welcome.
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 5:50 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
wrote:
> I've searched the docs one-by-one. I seek a simpler way to repeat a frame.
>
> This:
>
>
> split[1][2],[1]setpts=(N+floor(N/4))/FR/TB[3],[2]select=eq(mod(n\,4)\,3),setpts=(N*5+4)/FR/TB[4],[3][4]interleave
>
> works, but perhaps
On 2021-03-02 13:13, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
On 2021-03-02 15:18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
…timebase is not 64bit, I believe this was already mentioned.
No, it has not been mentioned.
Mark, I can point to three times it has been mentioned, in the last
month, in threads which you
Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 17:50 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
:
>
> I've searched the docs one-by-one. I seek a simpler way to repeat a frame.
Increase the frame rate, either with the fps filter or the ffmpeg option "-r".
They differ in their greediness and verbosity on the status line.
Carl
On 2021-03-02 13:31, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 17:50 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
:
I've searched the docs one-by-one. I seek a simpler way to repeat a frame.
Increase the frame rate, either with the fps filter or the ffmpeg option "-r".
They differ in their
Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 21:42 Uhr schrieb Paul B Mahol :
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:59 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > There is no AVFrac in the (current) codebase.
> >
> Funny how he look at ultra old svn code dump, good luck with that,
>
> How he even managed to find links to svn stuff
On 2021-03-02 16:34, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
On 2021-03-02 13:13, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
On 2021-03-02 15:18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
…timebase is not 64bit, I believe this was already mentioned.
No, it has not been mentioned.
Mark, I can point to three times it has been mentioned, in
On 2021-03-01 16:43, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote:
The ffmpeg filter pipeline assigns a 'PTS' to each frame, frame by
frame. Is *that* 'PTS' an int64_t?
I don't know how to answer this question. I don't know of a single piece
of code which is the "ffmpeg filter pipeline". I understand that
Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 01:47 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
:
>
> The ffmpeg filter pipeline assigns a 'PTS' to each frame,
> frame by frame.
This may not be completely unreasonable but some
comments are still necessary:
The sentence sounds to me as if the the filter pipeline always
assigns
Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
:
>
> On 2021-03-02 13:31, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 17:50 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
> > :
> >>
> >> I've searched the docs one-by-one. I seek a simpler way to repeat a frame.
> >
> > Increase the
On 2021-03-02 15:18, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
:
On 2021-03-02 13:31, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 17:50 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
:
I've searched the docs one-by-one. I seek a simpler way to repeat a
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:59 PM Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am Di., 2. März 2021 um 01:47 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
> :
> >
> > The ffmpeg filter pipeline assigns a 'PTS' to each frame,
> > frame by frame.
>
> This may not be completely unreasonable but some
> comments are still necessary:
ffmpeg has the option to split file based on time. Say starting with time t
and go for length l.
I am thinking of basically computing the time windows which will result in
the desired file size. Say a 1 min video of 20 MB will need to be split in
parts roughly 6 sec each.
Is there an option to
17 matches
Mail list logo
