Le 27/10/2022 à 17:46, John Van Ostrand a écrit :
Hi All,
The RAW video discussion had me thinking about resolution and bit rates for
video and I had some questions. These are not how-to questions but general
video questions. I'm an amateur so the contest of these questions is around
video for
I suppose there's a couple of other things to be said about raw video, or in
fact any less-complex codec.
First, it requires less CPU time to play it back. If for some reason you're
storage-rich but CPU poor in some very specific application, especially some
piece of embedded electronics where
Carl's comments are great. I try to carve out duplicate content, but
this Q format may allow for leaving Carl's initial reply inline.
>> 1. Why does it make sense to convert from a lossy format to raw?
>> You're not
>> gaining any more detail.
>
> It doesn't, unless you need raw for some further
[knocking off a quick answer]
On 10/27/2022 8:46 AM, John Van Ostrand wrote:
1. Why does it make sense to convert from a lossy format to raw? You're not
gaining any more detail.
It doesn't, unless you need raw for some further processing (that's what
happens in the ffmpeg pipeline- demux,
Hi All,
The RAW video discussion had me thinking about resolution and bit rates for
video and I had some questions. These are not how-to questions but general
video questions. I'm an amateur so the contest of these questions is around
video for home movies and social media, stored and shared as