From what I've seen, it is functionally an expansion on 265 in the same way
that 265 was an expansion on 264.
And yes, the same political problems attend it that also attended 265, and no
real effort has been made to solve those problems.
As such it's probably irrelevant how good it is because
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:02:17 +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> ffmpeg doesn't have support for that yet. Patch welcome. Perhaps if the
> MPEG consortium could provide a free, open reference decoder
> implementation? Just dreaming...
My bad, that Reddit does point to the Fraunhofer
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 09:45:56 +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> Hi Deian,
[...]
> Is it this thread?
> https://www.reddit.com/r/VVC/comments/hputue/no_way_found_to_play_vvc_files/
>
> Kindly describe your problem directly here.
Ah, is VCC identical with H.266? Yet another patent encumbered next
Hi Deian,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:16:08 +, FFmpeg user discussions wrote:
> Hi !
> I have some VVC (versatile video codec) files and wanted to run some tests to
> see how much computational power is needed to decode them. The FFmpeg does
> not recognize the stream, even when i use the
