>>> trash are still within that user's control (no privacy issues).
>>>
>>> - Jim
>>>
>>>> On Apr 12, 2016, at 2:38 AM, Charles Francoise
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I’m
ry so any user quotas can be enforced and documents moved to the
>> trash are still within that user's control (no privacy issues).
>>
>> - Jim
>>
>>> On Apr 12, 2016, at 2:38 AM, Charles Francoise wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>&g
y to a cloud drive).
>>
>> Since only one user manipulates the files at any time, it would be
>> interesting to have a network Trash. Is this something that can be done?
>> Either by exposing a “Trash enabled” capability for the filesystem, or
>> perhaps i
;
> Since only one user manipulates the files at any time, it would be
> interesting to have a network Trash. Is this something that can be done?
> Either by exposing a “Trash enabled” capability for the filesystem, or
> perhaps in the kernel extension for the filesystem?
>
>
Hi,
I’m currently working on a network filesystem that can only be used by one user
at any time (similarly to a cloud drive).
Since only one user manipulates the files at any time, it would be interesting
to have a network Trash. Is this something that can be done? Either by exposing
a “Trash
