Tony Sleep wrote: (manually trimmed...)
Tony, I am impressed with the way you trim your quotes.
Nope, it's the mail client I use - just highlight the bit I want quoted,
press
'c' to comment, then 'Ctrl/Q' to copy the quote across. Ameol is a
dedicated
piece of s/w which also functions as an
Graham wrote:
it's come down to the Acer Scanwit 2720 as it's a great price, BUT I like
Nikon stuff, is the LS30 really a better scanner for the extra cash? I did
fancy the Minolta Scandual2 but here in the UK it's a full 33% more
expensive then it is in the US and that I object to..
Seems like
Another comment to add to Roman's If it were true that the automation will
replace the brain, then why do professional writers make so much money when we
have word processors? These yechno auto toys are all meant to be extensions of
and not replacements for the brain... the brain is the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I'm pretty new to this list, but could do with advice. I'm looking for a
film scanner that won't break the bank (aren't we all) and it's come
down to the Acer Scanwit 2720 as it's a great price, BUT I like Nikon
stuff, is the LS30 really a better
At the risk of getting a black eye: I have just received info that a
Chip reprogrammer will shortly be available for Epson Chipped carts for
$20 and the chip can be moved to other carts containing different inks
(like archival).
I smell a law suit. If anyone wishes to discuss this further,
Dicky wrote:
Actually I have every confidence in the abilities of the man camera
manufacturers to produce the totally automated and independent self
operational camera before the next decade is out.
"What does that mean squire?" I hear you ask...
well what it means my son is that the
Dieter Henkel wrote:
Hello all,
I hope this question wasn't asked ten times before and if so please
answer me privately.
I bought a Minolta Dimage Scan Elite and installed it on my computer
running Windows 2000. It works very well apart from the annoying fact
that each time I start
Mr Wilkinson PLEASE!
Everyone likes to talk futures, it's fun and what's more it costs nothing,
and what's even more, anyone can do it.
Soothsaying has been with us always and always will be with us.
Just remember...soothsayers never make money because they never guess right
often
I disagree that a high end digital camera (which will cost at least US$1000 to
get 3.3 MP and that still doesn't approach the information even a Scanwit can
offer) will do the job for B/W. B/W is not just a matter of "dumping the
color"... at least not if you are a serious practitioner of the
Nope, it's the mail client I use - just highlight the bit I want quoted,
press
'c' to comment, then 'Ctrl/Q' to copy the quote across. Ameol is a
dedicated
piece of s/w which also functions as an offline reader for conferencing at
CIX
(www.cix.co.uk) and usenet. But ISTR that Eudora
Yet Outlook itself, which is supposed to be a more full-featured product,
doesn't seem to have this feature. Unless enabling it is in some obscure
place I can't find.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
In Outlook Express and Entourage (Office2000)
Several users have reported a problem with the Mac version of Binuscan
running on Polaroid scanners. After doing ~50 scans the software produces an
error message saying no dongle is found (software does not require a
dongle). This bug has been traced to a particular file.
Binuscan has just
Hi!
I think that the problem will probably go away. The problem is that SCSI has
about 8 subdevices. There is no need to install any driver, but Windows is
stupid enough to request a driver for all subdevices. So just answering yes
or no at least 8 times to all stupid questions should make
Price difference is about $200.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Arthur Entlich" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Acer or Nikon?
|
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Hi All
|
| I'm pretty new to this list, but
Does anybody know how to get rid of this annoying driver-request?
You can get rid of these annoying message by putting the attached
file in c:\windows\inf.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
; FILMSCAN.INF -- Windows Still Image Setup File for film scanners
; Copyright (c) 2000 Hamrick Software
;
I recently purchased a Minolta Scan Dual and so far, I'm happy with it's
performance. I've been trying to scan a number of old negatives however
and am having a terrible time getting them clean enough to not require
extensive touchup with Photoshop.
I've even tried scanning some negatives
Michael (correctly) wrote:
I disagree that a high end digital camera (which will cost at least US$1000
to get 3.3 MP and that still doesn't approach the information even a Scanwit
can offer) will do the job for B/W. B/W is not just a matter of "dumping the
color"... at least not if you are a
Try PEC-12 or Kodak film cleaner and/or some compressed air. The dust on
the just-processed film may be the processor's doing in running the film
through their machine or in handling it afterward. If it's bad enough you
may be wise to try another film processor.
Maris
- Original Message
Sorry Michael but a 1000 dollar 3.3 megapixel certainly is not high
end,sadly.
A back for a hasselblad with the new Kodak 48mb chip will set you back
around 20,000 US dollars ,that's not bad for a single shot job,quality
that is ,not price.
the rest of your comments are right on.
regards.
Michael
I haven't owned of used one. You are right about the specs. The
complaints (and there have been quite a few) is that the software is
very problematic. I think Kodak just slashed the price on it, as well.
The other thing about Kodak, as a company, that I'd watch out for is this:
They tend
A few ideas. Someone mentioned the anti-static wipes, there is also
something called Kimwipes which are for darkroom use. There is also
made a anti-static brush (although I'm not recommending it due to
radiation issues, (which created a long debate before, so I'm not going
into it again)).
IronWorks wrote:
Try PEC-12 or Kodak film cleaner and/or some compressed air. The dust on
the just-processed film may be the processor's doing in running the film
through their machine or in handling it afterward. If it's bad enough you
may be wise to try another film processor.
Maris
I am also running Win ME, and I average about 2 mins per scan on a home
built AMD K6II 450.
Spencer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Traudt
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners:
Dave,
I bought one after I learned on the original Scan Dual. I think that it is
a great scanner. The software seems to be a little buggy at times, but it
works for me. A lot of features, and the ability to scan a whole roll at
one time. I have not had to make any color corrections in PS
24 matches
Mail list logo
