I never use the "long pass" setting. Instead, I use 2-4 passes in "Number
of Passes" and it works perfectly - no misalignment at all. I've got the
LS-30 so it should work on the LS-2000 I assume.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
"shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realized for my LS-2000 Coolscan, the 2nd pass would not
properly register with the 1st ... bummer!! ...
Huh? How come, Michael?? I've *never* had registration problems
with my LS30. :-7
Rob
I'm using a SS4000 which definitely suffers from misalignment on long
passes.
Why do you never use "long pass?"
- Original Message -
From: "IronWorks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical
Using VS on a Mac, is there any advantage to allocating more than the
minimum memory of 91614 kb?
Joel Nisson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I never thought to try it. How does it benefit the scan?
I had assumed that the normal pass would gather sufficient information,
especially when it passes multiple times picking up missed or bad data and
then averaging them out.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Joel Nisson" [EMAIL
Not an answer but maybe a clue - on my PC it seems to be a heavier user of
RAM than Corel PhotoPaint does to which it exports the scan.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Joel Nisson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 6:50 AM
Subject: filmscanners:
IronWorks writes ...
I never thought to try it. [long exposure pass] How does it benefit
the scan?
I had assumed that the normal pass would gather sufficient
information,
especially when it passes multiple times picking up missed or bad
data and
then averaging them out.
VS's "long
In a message dated 3/4/2001 7:53:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using VS on a Mac, is there any advantage to allocating more than the
minimum memory of 91614 kb?
It actually hurts performance to do this, since it takes away memory
from the system that VueScan uses to store the scans.
I assumed that LEP is one pass at a slower-than-normal speed. If so, it
shouldnl't be subject to mis-registration that MP can cause on some scanners
(SS4000).
--Joel Nisson
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. After I saw the mis-registration for LEP, I scanned
Joel writes...
I assumed that LEP is one pass at a slower-than-normal speed. If
so, it
shouldnl't be subject to mis-registration that MP can cause on some
scanners
(SS4000).
...
For a Nikon LS-2000, a 16x MP is a single pass operation ...
better described, it "multi-samples" rather
Hi,
In Japan it will be in shops on 24.03.2001, my local shop will sale it on this
day at the following prices:
LS4000 158,000Yen (~1338USD)
LS4 78,000Yen (~670USD)
The price seems to be good so probably I will buy one of them.
The problem is that it will be with Japanese software and it will
Colin,
I haven't been following the 1270/orange shift issue and never thought to
bring it up to Jay. I assume he would have mentioned it had he felt it was
a problem. He was very free with his feelings about all the issues we spoke
of.
Larry
Larry Berman wrote:
We've just finished an
I agree, and I have some new questions:
Is the scan in Vuescan's memory the same as the "raw scan"?
And do any of the settings on the Color Tab or the Media tab affect the scan
in memory and/or the raw scan?
Finally, if you know (or if it's not a trade secret for Ed), what type of
color
I am in error - it only seemed so because the image Vuescan makes in memory
uses the RAM.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "IronWorks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan Mac memory
| Not an answer but maybe a
Unless, of course, he - like many other big name photographers - is getting
endorsement money or free ownership, leasing, or use of equipment from
Epson. In so far as Epson did not openly or widely acknowledge the problem,
it is also possible that he has not suffered from the problem and is (a)
IronWorks writes ...
... I have some new questions:
Is the scan in Vuescan's memory the same as the "raw scan"?
Yes ... I have come to respect VS's "raw scan" ... scan it once
... save if you want to archive ... or 'scan memory' with any variety
of "crop" settings until the cropped TIFF
I haven't been following this thread, but in regards to reliability I
have the following anecdotal info:
My Hitachi CM741 has been on for 12 to 16 hours a day for five years
without a single glitch.
My Mag MX17F/S has been on and off for a couple of hours a day for
five years, and on for 12-16
shAf (me) writes ...
IronWorks writes ...
...
Finally, ... I scanned a Q-60 without [restore color] and the
colors were off - Blue was about 10 points too
low. With the Restore Color option checked the result was
fairly accurate. ...
Hmmm ... interesting ... as if 'restore
Tom,
Ed Hamrick mentioned that he will be upgrading Vuescan to operate the new
Nikon scanners. I would recommend using Vuescan over Nikon scanner
software, English or Japanese versions. If you haven't tried it you will be
pleasantly surprised.
Regards,
Bob
- Original Message -
From what I know of Jay Maisel, and I am sure Larry will concur... Jay doesn't
suffer fools or less than the best equipment for one minute (and a New York
minute at that)... Jay's quest for perfection and zero tolerance of less than
the best manifests itself in his work (his ratio of rejects to
Thank you Mike.
I couldn't have said it better.
In all the years that I've been involved in photography, I've never read
anything that would indicate that he would settle for anything less than
the what he considered to be the best. As you've been able to read in the
interview, he's not the
i have an LS-2000 and VueScan 6.7.5
i finally learned how to use it (VS) after a few weeks of experimention
and man does it kick NikonScan's butt.
but i have some questions:
1. cropping seems to be off, i lose about 1% of the image on the long
side. that's with everything on auto. if i select
22 matches
Mail list logo
