Lynn wrote:
Intuitively (using "non-linear logic," that is), I can see that a "Mix
Match" approach will probably produce the best results for retouching,
since
every "problem picture" has its own idiosyncrasies.
FWIW another technique which I have tried is resampling the image to twice
the
I also would like to put a word of support for Nikonscan here. I use
LS2000 and Nikonscan 2.5.1. I have tried Vuescan but just can't get it to
do anything better than Nikonscan (EXCEPT reduce jaggies) so I continue to
use Nikonscan. There has been a lot of negative discussion about
The manual is also available for separate download at Silverfast's website
http://www.silverfast.com/english/download/pdfs.html
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Bud" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Insight,
Julian wrote:
I also would like to put a word of support for Nikonscan
here. I use LS2000 and Nikonscan 2.5.1. I have tried
Vuescan but just can't get it to do anything better than
Nikonscan (EXCEPT reduce jaggies) so I continue to use
Nikonscan. There has been a lot of negative
I agree entirely, and of course Maxwell's service people said they had
never heard of the problem when I phoned them. So I suspect "interesting"
will be the main outcome of this exercise!
I think my jaggies has got significantly worse with time, which is not
surprising if it is a resonance
Richard,
I ran into a problem with Photoshop 4.01 on the PC where it posterized
badly when I did levels adjustments in 16 bit. The problem did not
occur if I worked in 8 bit. It usually happened in midtones going quite
dark blue-black.
I never printed these so, I have no idea what they
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't have said it better. It seems many posters like to hear
themselves talk and opine. Or debate endlessly like "Well said Joe, but you
know, back in 1969 when I worked for Jet Propulsion Labs, we experimented
with a coating for an airplane wing
"Julian Robinson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree entirely, and of course Maxwell's service people said they had
never heard of the problem when I phoned them. So I suspect "interesting"
will be the main outcome of this exercise!
I look forward to hearing if they can fix the design fault.
Does anyone have any idea why the list seems to periodically repeat posts?
:-7
- Original Message -
From: "Arthur Entlich" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 10:42 AM
"Dave King" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean jaggies are all through the image, or along the edges?
The jaggies are through the entire image but are most noticeable on high
contrast edges within the image. By "edge" I presume you mean the outer
boundary of the entire image. The jaggies
At 21:13 09-04-01 -0400, you wrote:
Mikael wrote:
SilverFast SE . Scanner software . A light version of Silverfast Ai.
Guides the novice user step by step to brilliant images. (Silverfast own
text)
-
Below is a quote from the Silvefast website and what confuses me is it
My apologies in advance to digest readers for the attached image. I've cut
it down to 6K to minimise the uuencoded text.
The attached photo is the result of a really icky combination of film and
light. The film is Kodak 320T tungsten balanced slide film, and I've taken
the photo by flash -
"Dave King" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean jaggies are all through the image, or along the edges?
The jaggies are through the entire image but are most noticeable on
high
contrast edges within the image. By "edge" I presume you mean the
outer
boundary of the entire image. The
In a message dated 04/10/2001 5:11:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Further, you have been quite dismissive of sometimes interesting,
sometimes useful contributions that come from people with longer or
wider experience than your own.
Those who are ignorant of their
Rob wrote:
FWIW another technique which I have tried is resampling the image to twice
the original size, using the median filter on the area I want to smooth,
then resampling back to the original size. This will lose detail, but is
very effective with things like the sky.
Your're right, that
Thank you for a very thorough, very detailed review.
Maris Lidaka
- Original Message -
From: "Dieder Bylsma" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 12:19 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Brief review of LS-4000
| Just thought I'd pipe in with my own two
I just went to http://www.silverfast.com/english/silverfast/se/ where it
reads:
Currently available versions: DC-SE for digital cameras, SE for Epson ,
Hewlett Packard, LaCie, Microtek, Nikon, Umax scanners.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Stuart" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
These are the symptoms that I had experienced with scans from my Epson Perfection
1200U Photo - midtone gradients in steps with a blue-gray to blue-black cast and very
pale greens (that should have been rich green). There was also a substantial loss of
detail in these areas of pale green. I had
Supported Nikon scanners.
LS 20
LS 1000
AX 110
AX 210
AX 1200
- Original Message -
From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SilverFast SE 49USD
I just went to
Hamrick Software - http://www.hamrick.com/
VueScan 7.0.12 Release Notes
April 6, 2001
What's new in version 7.0.12
* Fixed problem with using transparency adapter on
newer Microtek flatbed scanners
* Fixed problem with 24-bit scans on Nikon LS-4000
I could deal with
the blue of the fringe but not the darkness of the fringe:
(Using Corel PhotoPaint) I changed to LAB mode,
then adjusted the tone curve of channel B (the blue-yellow continuum
channel): I raised the middle of the curve from 0-0 coordinates to about
0-+2 or 3 on a scale of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 12:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Grain Aliasing Noise, revisited
snip
Does Photoshop have the ability to "feather" the edges of
Anyone know of a link to a tutorial on using the Kodak Q60 slide for the
creation of a scanner curve to calibrate a scanner? Thanks.
Ken Jaskot
I'll draw some flack from this you I can point you to, without recommending
or disparaging the site,
http://www.aim-dtp.net/aim/calibration/kodak_q60/index.htm
I haven't had the time to go through his method or try it but if you do
please let me know whether it's good, bad or indifferent.
Maris
24 matches
Mail list logo
