First off, let me explain that the reason I haven't been very active on
the list the last week is twofold,
1) my ISP has somehow corrupted my mailbox again, and I have to go
through a painful process to read my mail, and torture to actually reply
to it.
2) If that weren't painful enough I'm
Rob wrote:
Lynn, what scanner are you using? An Acer I think?
Right on. I don't think it was the scanner's fault, this time, although
Scanwit's density-range leave lots of room for improvement. :-) It was
definitely the camera (and the operator)--I'd have done better to meter the
grass, with
Some time ago, at the request of several on this list, I published some VERY
informal tests of the Epson Perfection 1640 at http://www.lauby.com/scanner
The images include one photo (church picture) that Jerry was kind enough to
print Piezo, with results that amazed us both. Since most of my
Hi
"Minolta Dimage Scan Dula II" scanner has USB interface.
Yes I can look for event log.
Let me try Vuescan too;
How does Vuesacn's scans compare with the ones taken from Minolta supplied
softwares.
I have written a mail to Minolta.
Minolta is so bad, none of the document that came with
I have had very good results from vuescan on the 1640 in BW (and also
colour tranny) - scanning 4x5
Tim A
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Yount
Sent: April 18, 2001 7:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners:
I live in Salt Lake City, which has fairly sizeable contingent of extremely
picky photogs... especially the large format landscape shooters... My local pro
shop, Pictureline, which takes on the air of catering to the trade, has started
to push the Epson 1640, which it seems a fair number of their
Hi James
Never used the 1640, but I noticed the UK computer magazine liked it whilst
having a free browse at Smiths.
It was up against some proper film scanners as well as flatbeds. I didn't
read it properly and I am not always too impressed with their reviews. They
may even have preferred it
Hi!
My experience is with the Scan Multi.
My experience is that the Minolta software gives more options, which may
however not always be very obvious. Vuescan is normally calibrated using a
Q60 slide, but there are no utilities for individual calibration by user. It
has setting for a lot of
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 3:40 PM
Subject: NORMAN CUSTOMERS - Norman Customer Alert
NORMAN CUSTOMER ALERT
Date: April 18, 2001
A new mass-mailing email worm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been reported in
the
Anyone else using 3.0 with the LS-30 or
LS-2000?
I've just started trying it, but the results are
pretty good.
Here's the link.
http://www.nikon-euro.com/nikoneuro2/download/Download_107d.htm
Edwin
Thanks for the link. But the Euro Nikon website implies that NikonScan
3.0 is only for the LS-40 and LS-4000. It still offers NikonScan 2.5.1
for the LS-30 and LS-2000.
I'm using 2.5.1 with my LS-30. I'll wait for reports that 3.0 does
work with the older scanners, and provides some
Oh I assure you that it does work, and the improvements in the
interface are well worth the trouble to install it. You only must un-install
2.5.1 before you install it. Perhaps you should check out the manual for it
before you give it a try, a 2.68 MB pdf. I have gotten great colors on
Anyone else using 3.0 with the LS-30 or LS-2000?
I'll have to try it and see if it kills the jaggies.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
I almost always use Vuescan, in preference to NS 2.5.1, but the few scans
I
did with NS 3.0 came out beautiful, both trans and negatives, so another
comparison might be in order, but NS 3.0 has a wealth of new features and
looking at the manual download would explain much more than I could
(At the risk of being labelled a Dicky..! :)
While I appreciate the thought behind these virus warnings (and it is
actually nice to see one that isn't a hoax!), may I suggest that this isn't
really the correct forum?
Particularly when this virus requires you to doubleclick on an attachment
Edwin,
Do you know if NikonScan 3.0 supports hi-bit export with the LS-30?
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Edwin Eleazer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 7:41 PM
Subject: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.0 with LS-30 Ls-2000
Anyone else using 3.0
16 matches
Mail list logo
