Thanks, Of course you have a significant point. I realized the point of
the one liner only after I had responded to Walter's response to me wherein
I actually underlined the fact that his contribution was the one liner but
did not realize what I had said until I sent the post. I guess I owe an
All,
I regularly post images to a critique page on my site. The current image is
one that I did using the new 8000. This particular scan does not have
visible banding (well that you can see on the screen anyway). If anyone
wants to take a look it's at http:www.lwsphoto.com Click on the Critiq
At 12:15 PM 6/24/01 -0400, Lawrence wrote:
>Peter,
>
>I got mine from State Street Direct Online. As for jumping in, I'd wait
>till this issue is understood. It is a growing concern at Nikon. Pehaps
>Rafe could jump in here and offer his experience. Rafe, are you on a Mac or
>PC? Are you seei
Dear Jerry,
I just took a look at your attachment in Photoshop. Of course, it is
heavily artifacted due to the downsampling and Jpegging.
The first thing I always do when I look at defects is to go into
channels and look at each channel as a separate entity. In this case,
all the problems I a
Silly me, I used almost exclusively Kodachrome back in the 60's 70's and
80's. I only really moved to E-6 films after they convinced me I could
trust them (in the 1990's), (other than Afga slides which used some
weird process (CF??) which has failed completely on me, and will need to
be dealt
Just two days ago, I was at a local retailer who showed me the new HP
scanner/copier (which is basically an inkjet printer and a scanner on
top). It was only $399 CAN, and they have reduced the footprint to that
of a small inkjet printer. Pretty amazing.
The part that relates to this discuss
Sorry Lynn, you are several months (which in this biz is centuries) out
of date.
Epson (the printer people) with Cambridge Institute (I believe this is
in Boston) have developed a method for using inkjet technology to spray
some type of transistors onto substrates, to make a color panel which
Look at the end...
One liners can make serious points, and his was that double-shooting can
make you miss the action.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (laurie) wrote:
> For the life of me, I fail to understand why Walter Bushell would post a
> message to the list repeating what Karl and Tony said on the list
Bloody hell Ed - I only just got around to installing 7.1! :)
Tim A
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: June 25, 2001 3:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filmscanners: VueScan 7.1.3 Available
>
>
> I
I use Windows 98SE so I'm not sure what the settings would be in Win2000,
but it depends on your Windows "Display" settings. The default Windows
color space setting is sRGB, so that would explain why your wallpaper looks
the same as Windows wallpaper and in AcdSee as (I assume) AcdSee is using
th
Darrell wrote:
>I have some vague idea of how infrared scanning is used to remove dust
and
>scratches from film scans on scanners that have this capability. Is there
>any possibility that this method could mistake elements of the actual image
>on the film for the undesirable dust or scratch and th
Stephen wrote:
> Is there no longer a 'Clean' feature for the
> Sprintscan4000? I see only 'Grain Reduction.'
Presumably grain reduction is all that has ever
worked, since the SS4000 has no IR channel.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Walter Bushell) wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Tony Sleep wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:15:00 -0700 Karl Schulmeisters
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > Respectfully, many pros are switching to digital.
> >
> > For newspaper use it's standard now. But I was rec
In a message dated 6/25/2001 3:11:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have some vague idea of how infrared scanning is used to remove dust and
scratches from film scans on scanners that have this capability. Is there
any possibility that this method could mistake elements of
I have some vague idea of how infrared scanning is used to remove dust and
scratches from film scans on scanners that have this capability. Is there
any possibility that this method could mistake elements of the actual image
on the film for the undesirable dust or scratch and thereby "remove" part
Hi
I know this questioon has been asked in this list for N'number of
times, but I am forced to ask again.
I scanned the negative in VS, using "ProPhoto" as colour space. Scanned
output had profile embedded in it.
I edited this image in Adobe PS6.0 and saved on to disk. I set this image as
Thanks, Isaac! It's always nice to get an endorsement.
Hersch
At 10:10 AM 06/25/2001, you wrote:
Hersch Nitikman wrote:
>
> For all the concern about the lifetime of CDs, I have been scanning
my
> personal archives of slides and color negatives ranging mostly
from
> the past 30 years, with a fe
After all the complaints about Nikon service, I thought I should add a note
on the other side. For the past several months, the LS-30 I bought last
July 6 had a maddening intermittent set of failure modes, including severe
banding, and severe gamut compression. I kept waiting for it to fail
pe
Is there no longer a 'Clean' feature for the Sprintscan4000? I see only
'Grain Reduction.'
STEPHENJENNINGS
P h o t o g r a p h e r
Cambridge, MA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Earlier versions basically limited the size of the largest dust spot based
> on wither the cleaning was set to ligh
> > printed at a resolution of 2 microns per pixel
>
> Just as a matter of interest, how the hell do you do this!?
>
I believe they use some sort of scanning laser device. "They" being some
other part of my company - I don't even know who or where as someone else
took care of the details after
I scan to the hard drive, and when done with a roll transfer to CD-ROM. I
use Irfanview (freeware) from
http://www.ryansimmons.com/users/irfanview/english.htm
to make a thumbnails sheet which I then print out on inkjet to stick in with
the CD, save a copy with the images on the CD, and save a cop
Tony Sleep wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:15:00 -0700 Karl Schulmeisters
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Respectfully, many pros are switching to digital.
>
> For newspaper use it's standard now. But I was recently speaking to an AP
> photographer who was grumbling that he has to try and
Hersch Nitikman wrote:
>
> For all the concern about the lifetime of CDs, I have been scanning my
> personal archives of slides and color negatives ranging mostly from
> the past 30 years, with a few older. I have to say that most of my
> 30-year old slides and negatives need Digital ROC (Restora
Hi, all!
I'm a little behind in my reading of this list, but I thought I'd respond to
this one.
One thing that hasn't been mentioned (that I noticed) is that this spec from
Stanley gives the operating life as 1000 hrs at IF=max. Usually, we power
an LED with something on the order of 20mA cur
For the life of me, I fail to understand why Walter Bushell would post a
message to the list repeating what Karl and Tony said on the list already
without making any further contribution. Did Mr Bushell forget to put in
his own comments and response? That would be the only explanation I can
thin
Thanks, Roger, for that work-flow description. I've also found that
anotating a proof-sheet is very labor-intensive, which is what prompted my
comments. Seems like there ought to be an easier way, but I haven't found
one, either--despite the claims of the software packages.
Keeping a tidy shop
Hi, Steve--
Yes, this is sort of what I was talking about, on a lesser scale--I had the
idea back in the 80's, Ray Bradbury had it back in the 40's. :-) It's a
little bit "Star Trek," but the concept is valid. Thanks for passing on the
web site. As of now, the technology is too expensive and t
At 02:46 AM 6/23/01, you wrote:
>If you want it to be cross-platform, you can do exactly this as web pages
>(ie with HTML). Anyone can then look at it in a browser.
Cool, I'll give it a try.
Thanks Tony.
Jules_C
At 03:50 PM 6/22/01, you wrote:
>Are these CD's for archiving purposes, or just to run a slide show?
archiving
>Do you want the thumbnails to open the full size images when clicked on?
yes
>It sounds like you want to create a web site that will run off a CD. It can be
>activated through autor
Karl and Art's points are (and should be) well taken. Film is an excellent
archival medium (less so prints). But the thing overlooked is the posibility
of disaster; fire and floods have taken a devastating toll on archives of
all types (and they're not very good for PCs, scanners or cameras, ei
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Tony Sleep wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:15:00 -0700 Karl Schulmeisters
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Respectfully, many pros are switching to digital.
>
> For newspaper use it's standard now. But I was recently speaking to an AP
> photographer who was grumbling that
Hi Alan,
I recently received my scanner back from Acer, but it still showed the same
problems. Here I have an example of an overexposed negative, which gave a
perfect fine grained print, but scanning with the Scanwit 2720S is useless
for such overexposed negatives as the negative is too dark for
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 01:15:00 -0700 Karl Schulmeisters
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Respectfully, many pros are switching to digital.
For newspaper use it's standard now. But I was recently speaking to an AP
photographer who was grumbling that he has to try and shoot everything
twice now - on
David,
Thanks,
Ian
- Original Message -
From: "Hemingway, David J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Polaroid 120 Recall?
> Ian,
> There has not been a recall on the SS120 on a worldwide basis.I do know we
> had a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a related note, I read in one of my electronic trade publications (
> E. E.
> Times) that a company has develop a chip to work with ultraviolet lasers.
> The article stated that the UV lasers could be used in CD writers to write
> the data more densely and that
Since I was quoted on the bottom of this (I've edited it out), I want
to make it quite clear that on many occasions I have stated that I find
the number one problem with digital is the poor archival nature of
storage, so I am in total agreement with Karl.
The problem of change of format, no easy
I want to thank the people who provided extra info regarding Elite
Chrome 200/ E200 film. I think it is time for me to write Kodak and get
some explanations from the "K-horse's mouth".
Art
Herm wrote:
> just ask the lab to extend developing time (in the first developer), here are
> the numbe
37 matches
Mail list logo
