I assume this image is on negative film, because if it is on slide film,
the detail is gone forever if it isn't visible on the film.
If it is on neg, your detail is probably there, but the overexposure of
the whites makes for a very dense area on the neg. You need to expose
for those areas
Since Ed's mailbox is clogged, I'll post my thanks here: Thanks Ed for
restoring the Mac version of Vuescan!
Any way we can find out what Apple did to piss Ed off? That would be
worth letting other Mac support and advocacy organizations know about. I
have a couple in mind...
Any way we can get
I have heard some horrible reviews of this film. Of course, it will
surely come up short if comparing it to Provia 100F. I'd love to
open up my world 2 stops in a decent manner.
Buy a roll and give it a try. I've only tried 400F the once, but I was
impressed by it. I thought the colour
I'd suggest you check household power quality.
Bob Wright
- Original Message -
From: Tomasz Zakrzewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:28 PM
Subject: filmscanners: problem with monitor
Electronic devices are hopeless. Every month some
It's dmax is 3,2 and it really shows.
For scanning NEGATIVES?
At 16:46 -0400 2/8/01, Stephen Jennings wrote:
but I'm not quite sure how to
make different exposures using Vuescan.
You are setting the 'image brightness' to 1 are you? Try 1.5 or so
for starters - this turns up the wick in your scanner so you'll lose
shadows but gain highlights. Then just
Hello there.
I'm a greenhorn scanner with a frustrating problem. I have a umax
powerlook 111 with the tranny adapter. I've got DUST problems that cause
vertical lines to run all the way through the frame from the top to bottom.
There are several parallel lines like this.
These lines only
Arthur Entlich wrote:
If anyone else is on the scan@leben list... are you having problems?
All my messages to it bounced yesterday and I got no mail from it today.
Code red strikes?
Yup, it's dead. Maybe it's the dreaded code orange epson fade? ;)
Haakon
Well, here's a rave review of 400F. I'm totally overwhelmed by this film. It's got
good colour fidelity, natural saturation, moderate contrast, fine grain - it's the
best 400 speed colour film out there IMO. It frankly doesn't come up that short in
comparison to 100F, either.
Also IMO it's
I expect to spring for the Nikon IV soon, but Nikon's specs stipulate Win98SE
as a minimum. I'm currently using Win95B, but own an upgrade disk for Win98.
My system is a 266 MHZ PII with 384 MB RAM and 2 USB ports. The question is:
does anyone have experience using the Nikon IV with Win98?
Ah-hah! That makes perfect sense. The speckles are too bright and pure to come from
the film itself. It's reasonable to assume they're an electronic artifact, and
aliasing is the likely culprit. That also explains why boosting the black point will
reduce them but not eliminate them.
To deal with the noise, you might try converting to LAB and then using the
median filter on the A and B channels - this should not lose any detail.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: John Matturri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 8:20 PM
Subject:
At 17:18 02/08/01 +0100, you wrote:
On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 23:04:10 -0500 frankmazz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
The Agfa Arcus 1200 is my first serious scanner. I'm doing bw and color
negs; both 4x5 and 35mm. I love it. I never see the model discussed here
so I wonder if I've got an unknown
In a message dated 08/02/2001 6:56:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quite honestly, anyone who uses a PC without running a competent antvirus
program is driving down a one way street with their eyes closed. Norton AV
costs very little ($40US), updates are automatic
I was referring *specifically* to the combination of Athlon/x
motherboard/W2K.
And
PRECISELY MY POINT - dear oh dear, some Athlon chipsets (KT133A, say)
don't
get on with W2K.
I have an Athalon 1.33 and a KT133A motherboard running W2K. Also
running a
load of USB SCSI
Not to add to the weight of this thread but with a Minolta Scan Dual II I
experience the same kinds of 'noise (just using this term generically -
please, no corrections about whether I'm using the right term) in the dark
areas as others describe when scanning Supra 400. Fortunately, when it's in
I should come clean
I was being deliberately provocative with my only taken for $40
comment - I hoped that it might help shake out some info on what was
going on - if only to put me in my place!
The $40 is neither here nor there - the real costs are learning the
interface, its quirks
David wrote:
Let me restate my admiration gratitude for a uniquely useful app, I
really appreciate the fruit of what must be an enormous amount of
brain strain hard graft.
Cool.
I have come to rely on it of course I am
cross when it's whipped away for such petty reasons.
If I was in
I use McAfee on my home machine. It's the same deal, $40 a year and daily updates. I
haven't noticed any impact on my system's performance and it's saved my bacon a number
of times.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 03,
In v03007800b78e63b8cc3c@[216.111.20.62], Mike Duncan wrote:
I was about to write a letter to Apple complaining about poor treatment of
Ed (I'm a Apple shareholder).
Write one anyway; it might stop it happening again!
Brian Rumary, England
Thanks Tony, but I've been using 7.17 since the day Ed posted it's
availability. I'll download it again the reinstall it but I don't think
that's the answer.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 11:18 AM
I used Calidad ink and Lexmark ink in a Lexmark
printer. One year later the Calidad prints have lost the blue / green while the
Lexmark prints have not faded.
Norman Quinn
Has anyone tried Calidad brand ink in their inkjet? Trying it
here at the moment. Judging by one A-B
Has anyone tried Calidad brand ink in their inkjet? Trying it here at the moment.
Judging by one A-B comparison, the colour is very close to Epson ink, the only
difference I can see is that green may be a whisker more intense. Longevity is
anyone's guess.
Colin Maddock
signoff
Hi folks
You might be interested in my Microtek ArtixScan 4000t review and scans.
If you want to contact me please do it personally because I am off list
for a while. All email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not AOL!
http://www.ohalloran.co.uk/microtek.html
Enjoy
--
**
Has anyone tried Calidad brand ink in their inkjet? Trying it here at the
moment. Judging by one A-B comparison, the colour is very close to Epson ink,
the only difference I can see is that green may be a whisker more intense.
Longevity is anyone's guess.
Colin Maddock
That's right!
It worked! He's back.
From Ed Hamrick-
If you're a Mac OS user, please stop e-mailing me about this. You win, I
give
up. I'll continue releasing VueScan for Mac OS 8/9/X, and in return, please
stop clogging my e-mail .
http://www.hamrick.com/mac.html
To resurrect support for the Mac OS,
In a message dated 08/01/2001 2:43:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My (admittedly drastic) solution has been to stop using Supra 400. I've
switched entirely to Provia 400F slide film, and I find it scans just
beautifully.
I have heard some horrible reviews of this
Pat Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I'll go this one better. I don't open attachments even
from most people I *do* know, without first saving and
scanning for virii. I have never been infected with
any kind of virus, in 20+ years using computers.
reinforcing Tony Sleep's and Norm Unsworth's
29 matches
Mail list logo
