I wrote:
Is the brush available in the land of Oz?
I just answered my own question; Polaroid in Sydney are send me a brush.
I hope it comes with instructions or at leas a diagram of where the sensor
is located! :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Dale wrote:
I use a couple Leica M6 manual 35mm rangefinder cameras to take color and
black and white slides. I use ISO/200 Kodachome and SCALA films that I
buy
along with mailers from BH in New York.
My computer is 1.5 year old, Windows 98, 450Mz PIII, 256M RAM, and lots
of
free hard drive
Being European, I'm more used to the straight trays,
but Carousel would also be fine with me, as long as it
is something standard. I haven't seen the suggestion
anywhere yet, but I think it would be a nice feature.
Looking at the Nikon feeder simply gives me the creeps
everytime I see it and
Hi Robert,
Here's a link to an active D1/D1x forum where your questions can get
answered immediately. Issues like yours are discussed daily:
http://www.juergenspecht.com/d1scussion/
Larry
I have been talking with a few wedding and commercial photographers who
expressed their intention to go
Wedding photography and commercial photography tend to be two very different
types of photography which have very different needs and demands.
Most wedding photographers are selling prints and mostly small size prints
8x10 or smaller with a few wall size enlargements. They have used medium
Most wedding photos are relatively small and 6Mp will be ample. They also
tend not to have any shots at infinity which is something my 3Mp camera is
less happy about - the closer you get to the subject the nearer the quality
gets to 35mm. This effect I think is due to digital quality degrading
Rob Geraghty [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:47:22 +1000
The scanner is cycling continuously as though
it is trying to initialise but can't.
The brush will fix your problem - I 've seen it with my own eyes! Call
Polaroid for one or ask someone here who might be close to
Rob Geraghty [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:47:29 +1000
Polaroid in Sydney are send me a brush.
I hope it comes with instructions or at leas a diagram of where the sensor
is located! :)
The brush fits onto the 35mm slide carrier which you then run through the
scanner and out
Thanks to everyone who has responded about the SS4000 problem. Hopefully
the brush will arrive on monday (sunday US time) and the problem will be
solved. Then I can try scanning that annoying slide. :)
Rob
Dale wrote:
I want to scan maybe ten slides a month. My main purpose will be to
publish the digitized photographs as attachments to e-mails or simply
file them one place or another in cyberspace.
Acer Scanwit (either with or without IR) is definitely worth looking at.
Some flatbeds have
Is that from Maxwells - who service Polaroid? or what source?
rob
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Thanks to everyone who has responded about the SS4000 problem. Hopefully
the brush will arrive on monday (sunday US time) and the problem will be
solved. Then I can try scanning that annoying slide. :)
Curves always seems to get the nod as the most sensitive / accurate to make
color adjustment. I have to admit I'm terrible at it.
Anyone know of a good online tutorial for working with curves?
Norm Unsworth, Owner
CS Golf (formerly Clark Systems Custom Golf)
Outstanding Quality and Value in
Formal wedding shots (in your studio or posed shots at the alter) have to be done with
medium format film because the customer will frequently want an 11x14 enlargement or
bigger. Candid shots at the reception can be done with 35mm film because the largest
print requested is likely to be 8x10
I responded to the initial post last evening but it never showed up.
There are a number of photographers shooting weddings with their D1x's.
Here's a link to an active D1/D1x forum where your questions can get
answered immediately. Issues like yours are discussed daily:
Scan Multi is up to 4 x 5
Ian
- Original Message -
From: Shough, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning 4x5 under $500 US?
Or a used Minolta Scan Multi which are available for around £500
But the
There are a couple of other considerations why MF is popular in wedding
photos
Lots of weddings are shot in poor light - both during the ceremony and the
candids, there is only so much the portable flash can do. MF film, because
of its larger image gathering area, performs better in the 'lower
Scan Multi is up to 4 x 5
Not according to the Minolta web site:
DIMÂGE SCAN MULTI ...
Usable film types include 35mm, Medium format, APS, 16mm, and TEM.
Are you thinking of the Polaroid SprintScan 45i Multi-Format scanner? It
looks interesting at 2000 dpi for 4x5. I will check used prices
--- Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Third, the 6 megapixel resolution is an interpolated resolution.
That is not true. The luminance information in one shot digital
cameras is
NOT interpolated (except in the Fuji cameras), only the chrominance.
Color
information is not near
--- Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Third, the 6 megapixel resolution is an interpolated resolution.
That is not true. The luminance information in one shot digital
cameras is
NOT interpolated (except in the Fuji cameras), only the chrominance.
Color
information is not
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/articles.html
He expects you to use CMYK but you can see through it.
Bob Wright
- Original Message -
From: Norman Unsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 7:37 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Why not
- Original Message -
From: Robert Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:51 PM
Subject: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras - wedding/commercial
photography
I have been talking with a few wedding and commercial photographers who
expressed
If you take your 4x5 film and cut it in half, it is. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shough, Dean
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:31 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning 4x5 under $500 US?
Scan Multi is
- Original Message -
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:14 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras - wedding/commercial
photography
...The digital camera gives you only 6M*8bit/channel=6Mbytes...
6Mpixels
...The digital camera gives you only 6M*8bit/channel=6Mbytes...
6Mpixels *8bits/channel *3channels = 144Mbytes. This assumes 3
bytes/pixel
it may be higher if bit deepth per channel is greater than 8.
Bob Wright
Er, no. That would be 144M BITS, not bytes, which is 24M Bytes...
--- Robert E. Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...The digital camera gives you only 6M*8bit/channel=6Mbytes...
6Mpixels *8bits/channel *3channels = 144Mbytes. This assumes 3
bytes/pixel
it may be higher if bit deepth
Rob wrote:
Is that from Maxwells - who service Polaroid? or what source?
I looked up Polaroid in www.whitepages.com.au and looked in Sydney where
their headquarters are. So the answer to your question is I rang Polaroid.
Maxwell Optics are the local agents for Nikon AFAIK.
Rob
Rob
--- Robert E. Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Robert Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...The digital camera gives you only 6M*8bit/channel=6Mbytes...
6Mpixels *8bits/channel *3channels = 144Mbytes. This assumes 3
bytes/pixel
it may be higher if bit deepth per
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...The digital camera gives you only 6M*8bit/channel=6Mbytes...
6Mpixels *8bits/channel *3channels = 144Mbytes. This assumes 3
bytes/pixel
it may be higher if bit deepth per channel is greater than 8.
Bob Wright
Er, no. That
I seem to be getting two and three copies of messages but not at the same
time-I just got a batch that I recall getting earlier today
Stuart
I knew I'd seen this b4-it was posted on the 14th August . Message server
flipped again :-))
Stuart
At 18:58 14/08/01 +0100, you wrote:
Hi all,
What do I do? I've been waiting over 2 months now for my LS4000 only to be
told each week, it will be here next week. *sigh* I rang Nikon UK today to
--- Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can repeat it all you like, but what you say is not entirely
accurate.
The data is two dimensional. Each pixel has position (an XY
coordinate)
as one dimension and color information as the other.
I don't follow you. I didn't talk about
And while it does not address my point at all there
are more then the two 'dimensions' you mentioned, i.e. time, etc.
It certainly does address your point, you may not understand why though.
There are not any other dimensions than I stated (positional and value) to
the data you get from a
I recently received my SprintScan 4000 and also
purchased Vuescan (after a quick comparison with Polacolar). I have a few
elementary questions. 1) I had a dense set of negatives that I scanned using
Vuescan's default values with the exception of inputting a 3 as a value for the
"long
At 01:49 PM 8/16/01 +, Lynn Allen wrote:
Acer Scanwit (either with or without IR) is definitely worth looking at.
Hi Lynn,
Do you have problems loading slides into your ScanWit or is it just
me? I'd been using mine just for negatives for a few weeks and was
thinking that it was the best
--- Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are not any other dimensions than I stated (positional and
value) to
the data you get from a digital camera.
Well, you did get off-topic so I took the right to go off-topic as
well.
I was only commenting on what I believed was
Yes, I have noticed the same thing happening - especially this evening.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 7:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Re: Duplicate/triplicate
I seem to be getting two and three copies of messages but not at the same
time-I just got a batch that I recall getting earlier today
Can anyone please contact Tony Sleep directly about the message duplication?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
37 matches
Mail list logo
