filmscanners: Glass and Film

2001-08-29 Thread SKID Photography
I was wondering how hi-res flatbed scanners, like the Scitex Eversmart avoids the Newton ring problem? We have had several scans done on them, and there never seems to be a problem with those very pesky Newton rings, but many times when we try it at home ( on an admittedly cheaper) flatbed

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!

2001-08-29 Thread Brad Smith
Anthony, You've immediately, stoutly and thoroughly discounted ALL of the advice, suggestions and opinions you've recieved here from perhaps a couple dozen people. For every point raised, you've dispatched it in short order as not being helpfull for numerous reasons. As taught in every law

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!

2001-08-29 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Brad writes: As taught in every law school, you've had a counter argument for any and every point raised, without, as I remember, ever recognizing that there might be some validity to the point being made or, as I can remember, offering a thank you to those spending their time in trying to

Re: filmscanners: Comparing scanners

2001-08-29 Thread Rob Geraghty
Mike Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a thought - I don't know the guts of how Photoshop produces histograms, so this may not work as well as I think it could... Would it be a useful comparison of scanners to scan the same slide with Vuescan to raw files and compare the histograms? I

Re: filmscanners: (Linux)

2001-08-29 Thread Erik Kaffehr
Check http://www.vmware.com :-) I use Vuescan (http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html) for scanning from Linux), VMWare is pretty useful for running Windows 95, 98, NT or 2000 under Linux. Regards Erik Linux does not support the applications I require. -- Erik Kaffehr[EMAIL

Re: filmscanners: LS 4000

2001-08-29 Thread JFMahony91
yes i just installed nikon 3.1. nikon is sending the disk but i downloaded it from web site. right now we are checking the firewire card (second time) and the scanner it self. the scanner will prevue but not scan. trhe dell is a new pentium 3 500 mh laptop with 256 mb of ram. thanks. joanna

Re: filmscanners: LS 4000

2001-08-29 Thread JFMahony91
what are event viewer logs and where are they?

Re: filmscanners: Polaroid Optical Density

2001-08-29 Thread Bob Armstrong
Hemingway, David wrote: Simply, multi-scanning attempts to identify the pixels that change from scan to scan, These pixels are most likely noise and when statistically identified as such can be removed and replaced with values for adjacent pixels I found it interesting to read the process

Re: filmscanners: SilverFast Causes Crashes

2001-08-29 Thread Steve Greenbank
There are a few dual pentium solutions with 2GB SDRAM capability. Asus who are generally very stable have one with 4GB support. MSI also have one. Steve

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!

2001-08-29 Thread Ed Tyler
Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!! I am scanning film for output as large images (30x40 40x50) on an Epson 1 printer. I wanted to purchase a Nikon 8000ed scanner. Dealers in the US, that I have talked to would not quote a delivery date. In the same price range and with

Re: filmscanners: LS 4000

2001-08-29 Thread Pat Perez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what are event viewer logs and where are they? Event Viewer logs are (not surprisingly) logs of events (sorry, I cna't think of a better general description) grouped by type of event. NT and W2k do this in the background, and logs are created for System, Security,

filmscanners: Nikon 8000

2001-08-29 Thread DaleH
Is anyone using the Nikon 8000? How does it handle those big floppy 6x6 and 6x9 films? Any other comment or link appreciated. DaleH

Re: filmscanners: SilverFast Causes Crashes

2001-08-29 Thread Steve Greenbank
Sorry all, This is a stray message that was meant to be sent offlist and appears to have little relevance without the offlist message I sent earlier. Steve - Original Message - From: Steve Greenbank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:54 PM

Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000

2001-08-29 Thread rlb
Dale: I have had my 8000 for about a month. After unpacking and setting up the scanner I quickly determined that the 120 negative holder that comes with the unit would not hold the negatives flat. In my opinion it is an extremely poor design. Perhaps I didn't play with it enough to

Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it's way

2001-08-29 Thread Steve Greenbank
I never claimed their examples had any aesthetic quality, but I do think the software appears to be pretty impressive. Save image 25 or 26 and see if you can get anywhere near the processed example they show you. Steve - Original Message - From: Winsor Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - crop files missing

2001-08-29 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
If you are scanning from film then unchecking the Output raw file box should not result in the lack of a TIFF file (so long as you have the Output TIFF file box checked and a TIFF file name typed in). If this is really happening you should try reinstalling VueScan or contacting the developer Ed

Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000

2001-08-29 Thread Moreno Polloni
Is anyone using the Nikon 8000? How does it handle those big floppy 6x6 and 6x9 films? Any other comment or link appreciated. The 120 filmholder that comes with the scanner grips the sides of the film, and you can tension it to flatten the film. If you films have a pronounced curl, you'll

filmscanners: VueScan LS-8000 Test Version

2001-08-29 Thread EdHamrick
I've got a test version of VueScan that works with the Nikon LS-8000. I hope to release it in the next day or so, but it would be useful if anyone with an LS-8000 (on Windows) could test it. If you find anything that needs fixing, please let me know today. It can be downloaded from:

Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low cost way to avoid the future

2001-08-29 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Arthur writes: Yes, but some of the modules of that software that communicate with the LS 4000 are likely not being used in your current configuration AND you have no idea what evil Nikon has hidden in their firmware within the scanner! Correct. But that obviously pales in comparison with

RE: filmscanners: Glass and Film

2001-08-29 Thread LAURIE SOLOMON
Really very simple; they use Anti-Newtonian glass as opposed to regular glass for starters. They might also use an Anti-Newton Rings powder on the glass between it and the subject being scanned. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of SKID

Re: filmscanners: (Linux)

2001-08-29 Thread Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
At 11:21 29-08-01 +0200, you wrote: Check http://www.vmware.com :-) I use Vuescan (http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html) for scanning from Linux), VMWare is pretty useful for running Windows 95, 98, NT or 2000 under Linux. I have yet to find a distribution of Linux that recognizes a firewire

Re: filmscanners: Comparing scanners

2001-08-29 Thread Mike Duncan
Mike Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suggest Stouffer gray target from www.darkroom-innovations.com. You'll find media settings in VS make big difference in OD range. A gray target would be nice but I don't think I could afford the import at the moment. You might try your photo dealers in

Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it's way

2001-08-29 Thread Winsor Crosby
I never claimed their examples had any aesthetic quality, but I do think the software appears to be pretty impressive. Save image 25 or 26 and see if you can get anywhere near the processed example they show you. Steve I admit it is amazing what it does, especially in the saving of images of

filmscanners: Nikon IV Depth of Field Test

2001-08-29 Thread Mike Duncan
Using the film strip adapter SA-21 with the Nikon IV and NS3.1, I obtained the following focus Nos. on a relatively flat Max400 negative (Landscape): End Frame: L Mid Right Top 221 228 219 Mid Top 217 225 217 Mid 213 217 212 Low 212 221

Re: filmscanners: Nikon IV Depth of Field Test

2001-08-29 Thread Mikael Risedal
Hello Mike I think I was the first to try out LS4000 in mars 2001 and reported some bad scans with curved film, and depth of field problem on my Ls4000 scanner. I wrote that the scanner was sharp in the middle and unsharp out against the sides and corner . Please give me a fully conclusion of

Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it's way

2001-08-29 Thread Steve Greenbank
No I would not have taken picture 25/26. But many press photographers might like to have the chance to capture a picture such as 25 in the case of a fire at say an oil refinery. Obviously they would want more smoke to remain in the picture but it would be very helpful if you can recognise where

Re: Re: filmscanners: New auto adjust software on it's way

2001-08-29 Thread markthomasz
Steve said.. Save image 25 or 26 and see if you can get anywhere near the processed example they show you. A quick tip - DON'T try it on the previews, as I checked one of them (the fireman in smoke haze), and it has not got any pixel variation in areas where the processed image shows

Re: filmscanners: LS 4000

2001-08-29 Thread Anthony Atkielski
I guess it's a good thing that your business doesn't depend on this on a daily basis, isn't it? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 14:37 Subject: Re: filmscanners: LS 4000 yes i just installed nikon 3.1. nikon is sending

Re: filmscanners: (Linux)

2001-08-29 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Erik write: VMWare is pretty useful for running Windows 95, 98, NT or 2000 under Linux. Why would I run any of these under Linux, when I can run them more easily, efficiently, and reliably without Linux at all?

filmscanners: Anti-Newton Rings powder

2001-08-29 Thread SKID Photography
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote: They might also use an Anti-Newton Rings powder on the glass between it and the subject being scanned. Sorry for my ignoranceWhat is 'Anti-Newton Rings powder'? Harvey Ferdschneider partner, SKID Photography, NYC

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Best film scanner, period!!!

2001-08-29 Thread Brad Smith
I somehow just knew that your response would not disappoint. Goodby Brad Anthony Atkielski wrote: Brad writes: As taught in every law school, you've had a counter argument for any and every point raised, without, as I remember, ever

Re: filmscanners: Anti-Newton Rings powder

2001-08-29 Thread Jim Snyder
on 8/29/01 10:37 PM, SKID Photography at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LAURIE SOLOMON wrote: They might also use an Anti-Newton Rings powder on the glass between it and the subject being scanned. Sorry for my ignoranceWhat is 'Anti-Newton Rings powder'? When you place two flat

Re: filmscanners: yet *another* low cost way to avoid the future

2001-08-29 Thread Brad Smith
Derek Clarke wrote to Anthony Atkielski: . Looking at your comments, I'm more and more convinced that you need to start planning for your next machine, and do it soon. . No Derek, you've got it all wrong!!! We should all be 100% convinced by now that Anthony needs

Re: filmscanners: Anti-Newton Rings powder

2001-08-29 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
It is a powder lightly dusted on the glass surface of the scanner to prevent film-to-glass contact. The film-to-glass contact is what causes the Newton Rings. Maris - Original Message - From: SKID Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:37

Re: filmscanners: Anti-Newton Rings powder

2001-08-29 Thread SKID Photography
They might also use an Anti-Newton Rings powder on the glass between it and the subject being scanned. Sorry for my ignoranceWhat is 'Anti-Newton Rings powder'? When you place two flat surfaces together, you get a form of banding known as Newton Rings that represent the